OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2005

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2005

Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty journal rankings 2005

21 ranked journals · Subfield in Decision Sciences

Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty has 21 ranked journals in 2005. The median OJR rose 0.07 on 2004 to 0.55, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.66. The top three are Learned Publishing, Scientometrics, and Structural Safety.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2005. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2002–2004, the window the 2005 score is computed on.

21
22% of Decision Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.55+0.07 vs 2004
This subfieldAll 0.79World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

0%
All fields: 15%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,470
Median positive listed APC: $3,470 among 13 journals. 8 have no known price. All fields: $3,550.

Subfields of Decision Sciences (4)

21 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty ranking, 2005

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2004. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2002–2004, the window the 2005 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2002–2004 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2005.

Compare
1Learned PublishingWiley · United Kingdom
2.02Q10.87 0.19 up from 200414544%$2,080
2ScientometricsSpringer Nature (Netherlands) · Hungary
1.87Q11.84 0.43 up from 20042768%$3,190
3Structural SafetyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.85Q11.28 0.30 down from 2004818%$4,430
4Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyElsevier BV · United States
1.83Q13.00 0.12 down from 200456015%$4,210
5Journal of Quality TechnologyTaylor & Francis · United States
1.78Q11.56 0.11 up from 20041610%—
6Reliability Engineering & System SafetyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.66Q11.28 0.07 down from 20044889%$4,830
7Research EvaluationOxford University Press · United Kingdom
1.66Q21.09 0.27 up from 2004517%$3,470
8Probabilistic Engineering MechanicsElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.26Q21.07 0.11 down from 20041254%$3,370
9MetrologiaIOP Publishing
1.02Q21.08 0.29 up from 200457328%$3,325
0.85Q20.60 0.35 down from 200417812%$4,550
11Journal of Scholarly PublishingUniversity of Toronto Press · Canada
0.55Q20.25 0.06 up from 2004954%—
12Process Safety ProgressWiley · United States
0.51Q30.51 0.17 up from 20041323%$3,570
13Sequential AnalysisTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.47Q30.34 0.19 down from 2004764%—
14Quality EngineeringTaylor & Francis · United States
0.47Q30.40 0.12 up from 20042752%—
15Safety and ReliabilityTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.33Q30.07 0.11 down from 2004520%—
16Science & Technology LibrariesTaylor & Francis · United States
0.32Q30.17 0.05 up from 2004893%—
17Accreditation and Quality AssuranceSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.29Q40.39 0.10 down from 20044207%$3,890
0.25Q40.33 0.31 up from 200449——
19Publishing Research QuarterlySpringer Science+Business Media · United States
0.15Q40.05 0.05 down from 2004850%$3,290
0.06Q40.10no change2401%$3,300
21Economic Quality ControlDe Gruyter · Germany
0.02Q40.18no change570%—

Citations made in 2005. Corpus-wide, 70.9% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

6 additional Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2002–2004, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2005. Publication window: 2002–2004. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
21
Window papers (baseline)
9,385 +13.6% from indicator year 2002
Median OJR
0.55 -11.7% from indicator year 2002
Rising journals (2025)
1

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2002–2004 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1718192221212221222426272830333540404142414243424243
Window papers (baseline)7,6557,8818,2618,5308,8999,38510,13611,11812,00013,29514,46515,54416,41617,45818,88719,79220,29020,36620,77621,44122,51123,11923,51723,02022,64622,974
Median OJR0.630.690.620.450.480.550.760.8501.150.920.8420.8480.960.8401.010.870.860.7490.8460.880.950.8540.790.7470.740.90

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.