Journal rankings · indicator year 2006
Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.
Subfield ranking · 2006
Human-Computer Interaction journal rankings 2006
11 ranked journals · Subfield in Computer Science
Human-Computer Interaction has 11 ranked journals in 2006. The median OJR fell 0.20 on 2005 to 1.44, above the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 4.27. The top three are ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Human-Computer Interaction, and International Journal of Human-Computer Studies.
Ranks and citation indicators: 2006. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.
Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2003–2005, the window the 2006 score is computed on.
The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.
The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.
The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.
Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.
Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.
Subfields of Computer Science (11)
- Artificial Intelligence203
- Information Systems88
- Computational Theory and Mathematics70
- Computer Networks and Communications69
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition69
- Hardware and Architecture13
- Computer Science Applications12
- Human-Computer Interaction11
- Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design9
- Signal Processing8
- Software3
11 ranked journals
Filters
Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest. | OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields. The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list. | Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field. ▲ or ▼ is the change from 2005. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. | Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2003–2005, the window the 2006 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked. | Share of the journal’s 2003–2005 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal. | List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed. | The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2006. | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1ACM Transactions on Computer-Human InteractionAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States | 6.63Q1 | 5.88 1.66 up from 2005 | 56 | 13% | — | ||
2Human-Computer InteractionTaylor & Francis · United States | 5.96Q1 | 6.58 2.13 up from 2005 | 47 | 18% | — | ||
3International Journal of Human-Computer StudiesElsevier BV · United Kingdom | 4.27Q1 | 2.72 0.83 down from 2005 | 246 | 5% | $3,510 | ||
4PRESENCE Virtual and Augmented RealityThe MIT Press · United States | 2.21Q2 | 2.23 0.07 down from 2005 | 192 | 14% | — | ||
5Interacting with ComputersOxford University Press · United Kingdom | 2.06Q2 | 1.68 0.01 down from 2005 | 160 | 18% | $3,794 | ||
6ACM Transactions on Applied PerceptionAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States | 1.44Q2 | 2.07 0.81 down from 2005 | 59 | 4% | — | ||
7interactionsAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States | 1.23Q3 | 0.73 0.15 down from 2005 | 333 | 1% | — | ||
8Virtual RealityOASpringer Science+Business Media · United Kingdom | 1.14Q3 | 1.02 0.21 up from 2005 | 74 | 17% | $2,990 | ||
9The turkish online journal of educational technologySakarya University · Türkiye | 0.44Q3 | 0.24 0.03 down from 2005 | 90 | 0% | — | ||
10Digital CreativityTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom | 0.24Q4 | 0.20 0.05 up from 2005 | 87 | 12% | — | ||
11i-comOAR. Oldenbourg Verlag · Germany | 0.12Q4 | 0.09 0.05 down from 2005 | 119 | 23% | $848 |
Subfields of Computer Science, with Human-Computer Interaction highlighted.
- Artificial Intelligence203
- Information Systems88
- Computational Theory and Mathematics70
- Computer Networks and Communications69
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition69
- Hardware and Architecture13
- Computer Science Applications12
- Human-Computer Interaction11
- Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design9
- Signal Processing8
- Software3
Journals
Citations made in 2006. Corpus-wide, 71.3% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.
6 additional Human-Computer Interaction journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2003–2005, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.
At a glance
Indicator year: 2006. Publication window: 2003–2005. How these summaries are calculated
- Ranked journals
- 11
- Window papers (baseline)
- 3,529 +31.0% from indicator year 2003
- Median OJR
- 1.44 -21.5% from indicator year 2003
- Rising journals (2025)
- 0
Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2003–2005 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.
| Measure | Year series | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranked journals | 9 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 19 | 19 | 21 | 24 | 24 | 28 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | |
| Window papers (baseline) | 2,012 | 2,272 | 2,427 | 2,694 | 2,871 | 3,199 | 3,529 | 4,064 | 4,615 | 5,279 | 5,908 | 6,669 | 7,225 | 7,889 | 8,487 | 9,029 | 9,462 | 9,605 | 9,952 | 10,680 | 11,797 | 13,202 | 14,607 | 16,176 | 18,218 | 20,713 | |
| Median OJR | 2.02 | 2.18 | 2.29 | 1.83 | 2.54 | 1.64 | 1.44 | 1.45 | 1.36 | 1.39 | 1.63 | 1.67 | 1.78 | 1.70 | 1.40 | 1.42 | 2.01 | 1.374 | 1.38 | 1.19 | 1.49 | 1.365 | 1.60 | 1.29 | 1.370 | 1.34 |
How to read these rankings
- OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
- A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
- Quartiles
- Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
- Impact factor (2-year)
- Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
- Rank ranges
- Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.