OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2018

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2018

Human-Computer Interaction journal rankings 2018

21 ranked journals · Subfield in Computer Science

Human-Computer Interaction has 21 ranked journals in 2018. Its median journal scores above the world average: OJR 1.38 against 1.00, up 0.01 on 2017. A journal needs OJR 2.25 to reach Q1. The top three are ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Human-Computer Interaction, and International Journal of Human-Computer Studies.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2018. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2015–2017, the window the 2018 score is computed on.

21
2% of Computer Science
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.38+0.01 vs 2017
This subfieldAll 0.83World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

38%
All fields: 33%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$1,930
Median positive listed APC: $1,930 among 7 journals. Another 1 lists $0; 13 have no known price. All fields: $3,330.

Subfields of Computer Science (11)

21 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Human-Computer Interaction ranking, 2018

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2017. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2015–2017, the window the 2018 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2015–2017 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2009 to 2018.

Compare
1ACM Transactions on Computer-Human InteractionAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
3.40Q14.29 0.70 up from 201712157%—
2Human-Computer InteractionTaylor & Francis · United States
2.97Q13.38 0.84 down from 20175123%—
2.81Q14.06 0.78 up from 201725243%$3,510
4CoDesignTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
2.40Q12.41 0.01 down from 20177258%—
5Virtual RealityOASpringer Science+Business Media · United Kingdom
2.35Q15.82 3.22 up from 20176835%$2,990
6Aarhus Series on Human Centered ComputingOAÅrhus State and University Library · Denmark
2.25Q1—no 2017 value41——
1.98Q21.28 0.13 down from 20171970%—
8Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
1.71Q22.33no 2017 value12048%——
9Interacting with ComputersOxford University Press · United Kingdom
1.51Q22.10 0.51 up from 201711133%$3,794
10Frontiers in ICTOAFrontiers Media · Switzerland
1.40Q22.13 0.02 up from 201789100%$0 listed
11International Journal of Computer Games TechnologyOAHindawi Publishing Corporation · United Kingdom
1.38Q21.65 0.44 down from 201732100%$1,000
12Multimodal Technologies and InteractionOAMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute · Switzerland
1.31Q32.71 2.71 up from 201731100%$1,930
13interactionsAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
1.16Q31.21 0.09 up from 201753116%—
1.16Q31.50 0.68 up from 2017410%—
15Journal of Eye Movement ResearchOABern Open Publishing · Switzerland
1.09Q31.96 0.02 up from 2017109100%$1,207
16AIS Transactions on Human-Computer InteractionOAAssociation for Information Systems · United States
1.00Q31.07 0.07 up from 201740100%—
17ACM Transactions on Applied PerceptionAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
0.92Q42.00 0.30 up from 20177842%—
18PRESENCE Virtual and Augmented RealityThe MIT Press · United States
0.83Q41.24 0.03 down from 20179030%—
19Digital CreativityTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.66Q40.81 0.20 up from 20177241%—
20i-comOAR. Oldenbourg Verlag · Germany
0.65Q41.04 0.19 up from 20178021%$848
21Modelling Measurement and Control CInternational Information and Engineering Technology Association · France
0.05Q40.15no 2017 value3428%——

Citations made in 2018. Corpus-wide, 81.5% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

13 additional Human-Computer Interaction journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2015–2017, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2018. Publication window: 2015–2017. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
21
Window papers (baseline)
9,952 +10.2% from indicator year 2015
Median OJR
1.38 -2.2% from indicator year 2015
Rising journals (2025)
0

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2015–2017 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals999109101112121516171817171719192124242825252525
Window papers (baseline)2,0122,2722,4272,6942,8713,1993,5294,0644,6155,2795,9086,6697,2257,8898,4879,0299,4629,6059,95210,68011,79713,20214,60716,17618,21820,713
Median OJR2.022.182.291.832.541.641.441.451.361.391.631.671.781.701.401.422.011.3741.381.191.491.3651.601.291.3701.34

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.