OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2018

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2018

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition journal rankings 2018

123 ranked journals · Subfield in Computer Science

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition has 123 ranked journals in 2018. The median OJR fell 0.09 on 2017 to 0.64, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.15. The top three are IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, International Journal of Computer Vision, and IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2018. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2015–2017, the window the 2018 score is computed on.

123
11% of Computer Science
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.64-0.09 vs 2017
This subfieldAll 0.83World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

28%
All fields: 33%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$2,995
Median positive listed APC: $2,995 among 58 journals. Another 1 lists $0; 64 have no known price. All fields: $3,330.

Subfields of Computer Science (11)

123 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition ranking, 2018

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2017. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2015–2017, the window the 2018 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2015–2017 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2009 to 2018.

Compare
9.88Q117.40 3.46 up from 201779938%$2,645
2International Journal of Computer VisionSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
9.33Q18.08 9.14 down from 201724554%$4,090
3IEEE Transactions on Image ProcessingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
3.89Q17.84 1.34 up from 20171,72736%$2,645
4Pattern RecognitionElsevier BV · United Kingdom
3.24Q16.73 1.98 up from 20171,24523%$2,590
5IEEE Transactions on MultimediaInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
2.83Q15.68 0.43 up from 201790723%$2,645
6Autonomous RobotsSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
2.75Q14.01 0.13 down from 201726854%$3,990
7IEEE Transactions on Computational ImagingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
2.53Q14.68 0.07 up from 201715855%$2,645
8IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer GraphicsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
2.49Q14.88 0.54 up from 201788437%$2,645
9Robotics and Autonomous SystemsElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.43Q14.01 0.54 up from 201755030%$3,140
10Signal ProcessingElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.38Q14.81 0.93 up from 201799622%$3,190
11IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video TechnologyInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
2.31Q14.81 0.98 up from 201781923%$2,645
12CAAI Transactions on Intelligence TechnologyOAInstitution of Engineering and Technology · United States
2.30Q13.81 7.79 down from 201758100%$2,760
13Computer Vision and Image UnderstandingElsevier BV · United States
2.18Q14.06 0.20 up from 201748835%$2,090
14IEEE Signal Processing LettersInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
2.17Q13.79 0.28 up from 20171,24533%$2,645
15ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and ApplicationsAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
2.02Q14.64 0.78 up from 201718333%—
16Pattern Recognition LettersElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.96Q13.84 1.00 up from 201792723%$2,500
17Computer Graphics ForumWiley · Netherlands
1.90Q13.29 0.26 up from 201779426%$3,710
18Frontiers in NeuroroboticsOAFrontiers Media · Switzerland
1.78Q14.65 0.71 up from 2017105100%$3,801
19Optics and Lasers in EngineeringElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.77Q14.60 1.12 up from 201768320%$4,020
20Image and Vision ComputingElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.72Q13.58 0.56 up from 201727636%$2,100
21SIAM Journal on Imaging SciencesSociety for Industrial and Applied Mathematics · United States
1.68Q12.81 0.31 down from 201724560%—
22Journal on Computing and Cultural HeritageAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
1.67Q12.13 0.03 up from 20177932%—
23IEEE Transactions on BroadcastingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
1.55Q13.60 0.67 down from 201731944%$2,645
24Signal Processing Image CommunicationElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.54Q13.61 0.84 up from 201741919%$2,470
25Intelligent Service RoboticsSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.37Q11.87no change777%$3,190
1.35Q12.94 0.08 up from 201764911%$2,450
27Digital Signal ProcessingElsevier BV · United States
1.34Q12.88 0.56 up from 201762612%$2,580
28Computers & GraphicsElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.28Q11.52 0.55 down from 201736225%$2,770
29International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and ApplicationsSpringer Science+Business Media · Switzerland
1.27Q12.47 1.97 up from 20173822%$3,290
30IEEE MultimediaIEEE Computer Society · United States
1.23Q12.36 0.70 up from 201720113%$2,995
31Journal of Visual Languages & ComputingElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.15Q11.81 0.22 up from 201713418%—
32Machine Vision and ApplicationsSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.14Q22.30 0.20 up from 201724223%$3,490
33IEEE Computer Graphics and ApplicationsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
1.11Q21.19 0.39 down from 201732650%$2,995
34International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition (IJDAR)Springer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.08Q22.00 0.82 down from 20176126%$3,090
35Image Processing On LineOAImage Processing On Line · France
1.08Q22.18 0.21 up from 201755100%—
36EURASIP Journal on Image and Video ProcessingOASpringer Nature · Germany
1.07Q22.39 0.04 up from 2017180100%$1,790
37Multidimensional Systems and Signal ProcessingSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.07Q21.91 0.01 down from 201722314%$3,190
38IET Image ProcessingOAInstitution of Engineering and Technology · United Kingdom
1.06Q22.40 0.14 up from 201740818%$2,740
39International Journal of Big Data IntelligenceInderscience Publishers · United Kingdom
1.02Q20.89 0.84 down from 20171250%—
40Multimedia Tools and ApplicationsSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
1.01Q22.49 0.59 up from 20172,91512%$3,190
41Healthcare Technology LettersOAInstitution of Engineering and Technology · United States
1.01Q22.16 0.58 up from 2017137100%$2,500
42IET Computer VisionOAInstitution of Engineering and Technology · United States
1.00Q22.15 0.54 up from 201728624%$2,510
43Computational Visual MediaOASpringer Nature · China
1.00Q21.94 0.08 down from 201793100%$0 listed
44Journal of ImagingOAMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute · Switzerland
0.99Q21.82 0.08 down from 2017123100%$2,172
45Machine Intelligence ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · United Kingdom
0.96Q22.22 0.53 up from 201724416%$3,190
46Journal of Real-Time Image ProcessingSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.92Q22.05 0.29 up from 201724827%$3,290
47Pattern Analysis and ApplicationsSpringer Science+Business Media · United Kingdom
0.90Q21.59 0.34 up from 201724024%$3,390
48The Visual ComputerSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.88Q21.41 0.20 down from 201738823%$3,190
49IPSJ Transactions on Computer Vision and ApplicationsSpringer Science+Business Media · Japan
0.88Q22.38 1.16 up from 201761100%$1,029
50Multimedia SystemsSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.85Q21.41 0.06 down from 201713513%$3,490

Citations made in 2018. Corpus-wide, 81.5% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

51 additional Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2015–2017, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2018. Publication window: 2015–2017. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
123
Window papers (baseline)
70,424 +0.6% from indicator year 2015
Median OJR
0.64 -29.2% from indicator year 2015
Rising journals (2025)
12

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2015–2017 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals515458606162697790949793111116119116120120123131131134129123123120
Window papers (baseline)18,70419,73020,54122,52125,59728,24631,94535,37040,62344,20147,51851,02756,11861,01065,92370,03772,26571,59370,42471,72176,92284,29992,27198,347105,326115,071
Median OJR0.881.061.131.1431.1411.151.271.191.201.281.3851.3750.9801.0030.9790.910.740.730.640.6980.720.750.690.770.760.696

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.