OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2009

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2009

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition journal rankings 2009

94 ranked journals · Subfield in Computer Science

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition has 94 ranked journals in 2009. The median OJR rose 0.08 on 2008 to 1.28, above the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 2.37. The top three are IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, International Journal of Computer Vision, and Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2009. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2006–2008, the window the 2009 score is computed on.

94
12% of Computer Science
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.28+0.08 vs 2008
This subfieldAll 0.92World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

13%
All fields: 18%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,090
Median positive listed APC: $3,090 among 46 journals. 48 have no known price. All fields: $3,510.

Subfields of Computer Science (11)

94 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition ranking, 2009

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2008. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2006–2008, the window the 2009 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2006–2008 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2009.

Compare
8.74Q17.76 0.25 down from 200881017%$2,645
2International Journal of Computer VisionSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
7.27Q18.03 1.02 up from 200831634%$4,090
3Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/ProceedingsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
5.40Q12.69 0.50 up from 2008749——
4ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and ApplicationsAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
4.79Q13.34 2.64 down from 20088825%—
5Computer Vision and Image UnderstandingElsevier BV · United States
4.49Q14.80 0.96 up from 20082989%$2,090
6Computer Graphics ForumWiley · Netherlands
4.31Q13.75 0.07 up from 200842120%$3,710
7IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video TechnologyInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
4.26Q14.93 0.65 up from 20085738%$2,645
8IEEE Transactions on Image ProcessingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
4.18Q14.86 0.38 up from 200890513%$2,645
9IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer GraphicsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
3.98Q13.80 0.19 down from 200862116%$2,645
10Robotics and Autonomous SystemsElsevier BV · Netherlands
3.85Q12.95 0.24 up from 200831920%$3,140
11IEEE Transactions on MultimediaInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
3.65Q13.70 0.29 down from 200846010%$2,645
12Autonomous RobotsSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
3.51Q12.81 0.23 up from 200814331%$3,990
3.48Q14.95 0.97 up from 200829022%—
14IEEE Intelligent Vehicles SymposiumInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
3.47Q11.84 0.37 up from 2008200——
15Pattern RecognitionElsevier BV · United Kingdom
3.07Q13.37 0.50 up from 20081,03218%$2,590
16ProceedingsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
2.99Q11.72 0.89 up from 200846——
17IEEE Computer Graphics and ApplicationsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
2.71Q11.62 0.25 down from 200831712%$2,995
18International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition (IJDAR)Springer Science+Business Media · Germany
2.70Q12.68 0.49 up from 20087121%$3,090
19Intelligent Service RoboticsSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
2.63Q12.07 0.87 up from 20083012%$3,190
20Pattern Recognition LettersElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.45Q12.39 0.17 up from 200875610%$2,500
21ProceedingsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
2.45Q11.57 0.54 up from 200846——
22DCCInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
2.39Q11.21no 2008 value72——
23IEEE MultimediaIEEE Computer Society · United States
2.37Q11.69 0.45 down from 20082538%$2,995
24IEEE Transactions on BroadcastingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
2.37Q12.83 0.27 down from 20083033%$2,645
25Image and Vision ComputingElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.29Q22.19 0.05 down from 200852321%$2,100
26The Visual ComputerSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
2.23Q21.43 0.26 down from 200829914%$3,190
27Journal of Visual Languages & ComputingElsevier BV · United Kingdom
2.22Q21.83 0.24 up from 2008862%—
28IEEE Signal Processing LettersInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
2.09Q22.15 0.08 up from 200869712%$2,645
29IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in BiomedicineInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
2.09Q22.98 0.09 down from 200828719%—
30Journal of Mathematical Imaging and VisionSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
2.05Q22.24 0.20 up from 200820419%$3,090
31Proceedings - International Conference on Image ProcessingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
1.98Q21.34 0.31 up from 2008140——
32ProceedingsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
1.95Q21.10 0.05 up from 2008127——
33Multimedia SystemsSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.89Q21.53 0.40 down from 200816013%$3,490
1.89Q22.15 0.64 up from 20081624%$2,450
35Information VisualizationSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
1.85Q22.52 1.58 up from 20089021%$4,150
36Machine Intelligence ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · United Kingdom
1.74Q21.70 0.91 up from 20081513%$3,190
37Machine Vision and ApplicationsSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.74Q21.64 0.05 up from 200819312%$3,490
38Signal Processing Image CommunicationElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.72Q21.77 0.44 up from 200819315%$2,470
39Computer Science and Information SystemsOAComSIS Consortium · Serbia
1.71Q21.45 0.73 up from 200841100%—
40Pattern Analysis and ApplicationsSpringer Science+Business Media · United Kingdom
1.68Q21.48 0.32 down from 20081223%$3,390
41Signal ProcessingElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.66Q21.79 0.19 up from 20088133%$3,190
42Computers & GraphicsElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.64Q21.19 0.32 up from 200832714%$2,770
43Multimedia Tools and ApplicationsSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
1.47Q21.68 0.45 up from 200825926%$3,190
44ProceedingsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
1.41Q20.75 0.36 up from 200851——
45Journal of Real-Time Image ProcessingSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.31Q21.49 0.14 up from 200810112%$3,290
46Computer Animation and Virtual WorldsWiley · United Kingdom
1.31Q20.92 0.10 down from 200818515%$3,350
47Digital Signal ProcessingElsevier BV · United States
1.29Q21.34 0.21 up from 20082614%$2,580
48Journal of New Music ResearchRoutledge · United Kingdom
1.26Q32.21 1.61 up from 20087119%—
49IET Image ProcessingOAInstitution of Engineering and Technology · United Kingdom
1.25Q31.28 0.56 up from 20086913%$2,740
50IEE Proceedings - Vision Image and Signal ProcessingInstitution of Engineering and Technology · United Kingdom
1.24Q3—no 2008 value101——

Citations made in 2009. Corpus-wide, 71.4% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

35 additional Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2006–2008, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2009. Publication window: 2006–2008. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
94
Window papers (baseline)
44,201 +38.4% from indicator year 2006
Median OJR
1.28 +0.5% from indicator year 2006
Rising journals (2025)
12

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2006–2008 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals515458606162697790949793111116119116120120123131131134129123123120
Window papers (baseline)18,70419,73020,54122,52125,59728,24631,94535,37040,62344,20147,51851,02756,11861,01065,92370,03772,26571,59370,42471,72176,92284,29992,27198,347105,326115,071
Median OJR0.881.061.131.1431.1411.151.271.191.201.281.3851.3750.9801.0030.9790.910.740.730.640.6980.720.750.690.770.760.696

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.