OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2017

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2017

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition journal rankings 2017

120 ranked journals · Subfield in Computer Science

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition has 120 ranked journals in 2017. The median journal has an OJR of 0.73, below the world average of 1.00, down 0.01 on 2016; Q1 starts at OJR 1.56. The top three are International Journal of Computer Vision, CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology, and IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2017. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2014–2016, the window the 2017 score is computed on.

120
11% of Computer Science
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.73-0.01 vs 2016
This subfieldAll 0.84World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

26%
All fields: 32%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$2,995
Median positive listed APC: $2,995 among 57 journals. Another 1 lists $0; 62 have no known price. All fields: $3,350.

Subfields of Computer Science (11)

120 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition ranking, 2017

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2016. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2014–2016, the window the 2017 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2014–2016 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2008 to 2017.

Compare
1International Journal of Computer VisionSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
9.97Q117.22 3.14 up from 201625751%$4,090
2CAAI Transactions on Intelligence TechnologyOAInstitution of Engineering and Technology · United States
9.82Q111.60no 2016 value3589%$2,760—
9.65Q113.95 3.68 up from 201674828%$2,645
4IEEE Transactions on Image ProcessingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
4.11Q16.49 0.30 up from 20161,65925%$2,645
5Pattern RecognitionElsevier BV · United Kingdom
3.40Q14.75 0.07 up from 20161,13320%$2,590
6IEEE Transactions on MultimediaInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
3.24Q15.25 0.11 up from 201673715%$2,645
7IEEE Transactions on Computational ImagingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
2.89Q14.62 1.47 down from 20167629%$2,645
8IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer GraphicsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
2.83Q14.34 0.42 up from 201680922%$2,645
9Robotics and Autonomous SystemsElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.82Q13.47 0.01 up from 201654224%$3,140
10Autonomous RobotsSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
2.81Q14.14 1.31 up from 201622739%$3,990
11IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video TechnologyInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
2.77Q13.83 0.75 down from 201683112%$2,645
12Computer Vision and Image UnderstandingElsevier BV · United States
2.47Q13.85 0.09 down from 201644823%$2,090
13ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and ApplicationsAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
2.43Q13.86 0.22 up from 201617222%—
14IEEE Signal Processing LettersInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
2.38Q13.51 0.04 up from 20161,35022%$2,645
15Signal ProcessingElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.37Q13.88 0.61 up from 20161,10021%$3,190
16Image and Vision ComputingElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.33Q13.02 0.70 down from 201629437%$2,100
17Computer Graphics ForumWiley · Netherlands
2.29Q13.03 0.38 up from 201680931%$3,710
18IEEE Transactions on BroadcastingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
2.19Q14.27 0.07 down from 201630915%$2,645
19SIAM Journal on Imaging SciencesSociety for Industrial and Applied Mathematics · United States
2.12Q13.12 0.28 down from 201626850%—
20Pattern Recognition LettersElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.07Q12.84 0.27 down from 201684422%$2,500
21Journal on Computing and Cultural HeritageAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
1.86Q12.10 0.74 up from 20166927%—
22Signal Processing Image CommunicationElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.84Q12.78 0.35 down from 201636417%$2,470
23Image Processing On LineOAImage Processing On Line · France
1.76Q11.97 0.11 down from 201654100%—
24Computers & GraphicsElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.76Q12.07 0.40 down from 201630525%$2,770
25International Journal of Big Data IntelligenceInderscience Publishers · United Kingdom
1.75Q11.73 0.29 down from 2016773%—
26Optics and Lasers in EngineeringElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.74Q13.49no change66410%$4,020
27EURASIP Journal on Image and Video ProcessingOASpringer Nature · Germany
1.72Q12.35 0.80 down from 2016151100%$1,790
28International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition (IJDAR)Springer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.66Q12.82 0.80 up from 20166325%$3,090
1.60Q12.87 0.14 up from 201661010%$2,450
30Machine Vision and ApplicationsSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.56Q12.10 0.06 up from 201622324%$3,490
31Journal of Visual Languages & ComputingElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.55Q21.60 0.28 down from 201616321%—
32Journal of Mathematical Imaging and VisionSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.44Q21.88 0.83 down from 201620254%$3,090
33IEEE MultimediaIEEE Computer Society · United States
1.43Q21.66 0.27 down from 201617911%$2,995
34Multidimensional Systems and Signal ProcessingSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.41Q21.92 0.38 up from 20161845%$3,190
35Computational Visual MediaOASpringer Nature · China
1.37Q22.02 0.02 up from 201665100%$0 listed
36Digital Signal ProcessingElsevier BV · United States
1.34Q22.33 0.10 up from 201662011%$2,580
37Frontiers in NeuroroboticsOAFrontiers Media · Switzerland
1.33Q23.94 0.47 up from 201663100%$3,801
38Intelligent Service RoboticsSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.32Q21.87 0.02 down from 20166713%$3,190
39Multimedia SystemsSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.23Q21.47 0.08 up from 201617217%$3,490
40IEEE Computer Graphics and ApplicationsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
1.20Q21.58 0.08 up from 201631412%$2,995
41IET Image ProcessingOAInstitution of Engineering and Technology · United Kingdom
1.20Q22.26 0.59 up from 20163208%$2,740
42Journal of ImagingOAMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute · Switzerland
1.19Q21.90 0.13 up from 201648100%$2,172
43The Visual ComputerSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.13Q21.61 0.08 up from 201640622%$3,190
44Machine Intelligence ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · United Kingdom
1.10Q21.69 0.22 down from 201625718%$3,190
45Multimedia Tools and ApplicationsSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
1.03Q21.90 0.05 up from 20162,29711%$3,190
46Signal Image and Video ProcessingSpringer Science+Business Media · United Kingdom
0.92Q21.94 0.35 up from 201643714%$3,390
47Journal of New Music ResearchRoutledge · United Kingdom
0.92Q21.35 0.32 down from 20168556%—
48Journal of Real-Time Image ProcessingSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.91Q21.76 0.25 up from 201626021%$3,290
49IET Computer VisionOAInstitution of Engineering and Technology · United States
0.91Q21.61 0.25 up from 201627513%$2,510
50Pattern Analysis and ApplicationsSpringer Science+Business Media · United Kingdom
0.90Q21.25 0.04 up from 201622717%$3,390

Citations made in 2017. Corpus-wide, 77.7% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

51 additional Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2014–2016, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2017. Publication window: 2014–2016. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
120
Window papers (baseline)
71,593 +8.6% from indicator year 2014
Median OJR
0.73 -24.9% from indicator year 2014
Rising journals (2025)
12

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2014–2016 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals515458606162697790949793111116119116120120123131131134129123123120
Window papers (baseline)18,70419,73020,54122,52125,59728,24631,94535,37040,62344,20147,51851,02756,11861,01065,92370,03772,26571,59370,42471,72176,92284,29992,27198,347105,326115,071
Median OJR0.881.061.131.1431.1411.151.271.191.201.281.3851.3750.9801.0030.9790.910.740.730.640.6980.720.750.690.770.760.696

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.