Journal rankings · indicator year 2011
Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.
Subfield ranking · 2011
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition journal rankings 2011
93 ranked journals · Subfield in Computer Science
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition has 93 ranked journals in 2011. Its median journal scores above the world average: OJR 1.38 against 1.00, down 0.01 on 2010. A journal needs OJR 2.15 to reach Q1. The top three are IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, and International Journal of Computer Vision.
Ranks and citation indicators: 2011. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.
Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2008–2010, the window the 2011 score is computed on.
The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.
The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.
The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.
Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.
Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.
Subfields of Computer Science (11)
- Artificial Intelligence316
- Information Systems146
- Computer Networks and Communications99
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition93
- Computational Theory and Mathematics90
- Hardware and Architecture20
- Human-Computer Interaction17
- Computer Science Applications16
- Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design10
- Signal Processing8
- Software4
93 ranked journals
Filters
Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest. | OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields. The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list. | Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field. ▲ or ▼ is the change from 2010. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. | Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2008–2010, the window the 2011 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked. | Share of the journal’s 2008–2010 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal. | List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed. | The line is the journal’s OJR from 2002 to 2011. | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine IntelligenceIEEE Computer Society · United States | 8.85Q1 | 8.55 0.73 up from 2010 | 773 | 12% | $2,645 | ||
2SIAM Journal on Imaging SciencesSociety for Industrial and Applied Mathematics · United States | 6.81Q1 | 8.09 0.50 up from 2010 | 122 | 27% | — | ||
3International Journal of Computer VisionSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands | 6.64Q1 | 6.90 0.74 up from 2010 | 286 | 30% | $4,090 | ||
4Computer Vision and Image UnderstandingElsevier BV · United States | 4.72Q1 | 2.92 2.39 down from 2010 | 301 | 19% | $2,090 | ||
5IEEE Transactions on Image ProcessingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States | 4.01Q1 | 4.63 0.43 up from 2010 | 932 | 12% | $2,645 | ||
6Autonomous RobotsSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands | 4.00Q1 | 4.09 0.39 up from 2010 | 130 | 28% | $3,990 | ||
7IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer GraphicsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States | 3.77Q1 | 3.51 0.02 down from 2010 | 661 | 12% | $2,645 | ||
8Computer Graphics ForumWiley · Netherlands | 3.75Q1 | 3.60 0.04 up from 2010 | 710 | 16% | $3,710 | ||
9ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and ApplicationsAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States | 3.72Q1 | 3.26 0.01 down from 2010 | 87 | 13% | — | ||
10Proceedings of the International Symposium on Combinatorial SearchOAPublisher not listed | 3.68Q1 | 1.50no 2010 value | 32 | — | — | — | |
11Robotics and Autonomous SystemsElsevier BV · Netherlands | 3.68Q1 | 2.79 0.39 down from 2010 | 304 | 19% | $3,140 | ||
12Pattern RecognitionElsevier BV · United Kingdom | 3.41Q1 | 3.61 0.09 up from 2010 | 1,050 | 10% | $2,590 | ||
13IEEE Transactions on MultimediaInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States | 3.31Q1 | 3.89 0.44 up from 2010 | 401 | 11% | $2,645 | ||
14IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video TechnologyInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States | 3.20Q1 | 3.42 0.03 down from 2010 | 606 | 7% | $2,645 | ||
15Image and Vision ComputingElsevier BV · Netherlands | 3.14Q1 | 4.08 1.04 up from 2010 | 376 | 21% | $2,100 | ||
16International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition (IJDAR)Springer Science+Business Media · Germany | 2.63Q1 | 2.94 0.96 up from 2010 | 75 | 16% | $3,090 | ||
17Signal Processing Image CommunicationElsevier BV · Netherlands | 2.57Q1 | 2.12 0.35 down from 2010 | 208 | 10% | $2,470 | ||
18Pattern Recognition LettersElsevier BV · Netherlands | 2.39Q1 | 2.24 0.33 down from 2010 | 767 | 13% | $2,500 | ||
19Signal ProcessingElsevier BV · Netherlands | 2.29Q1 | 2.63 0.35 up from 2010 | 873 | 6% | $3,190 | ||
20IEEE Computer Graphics and ApplicationsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States | 2.23Q1 | 1.92 0.27 up from 2010 | 321 | 5% | $2,995 | ||
21IEEE Signal Processing LettersInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States | 2.21Q1 | 2.32 0.32 up from 2010 | 847 | 8% | $2,645 | ||
22Journal of Visual Languages & ComputingElsevier BV · United Kingdom | 2.19Q1 | 1.95 0.02 up from 2010 | 77 | 13% | — | ||
23Computers & GraphicsElsevier BV · United Kingdom | 2.17Q1 | 2.05 0.43 up from 2010 | 252 | 17% | $2,770 | ||
24Information VisualizationSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom | 2.15Q1 | 1.92 0.65 down from 2010 | 97 | 19% | $4,150 | ||
25Journal of Mathematical Imaging and VisionSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands | 2.15Q2 | 2.77 0.56 up from 2010 | 190 | 30% | $3,090 | ||
26IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in BiomedicineInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States | 2.12Q2 | 3.48 0.39 up from 2010 | 434 | 17% | — | ||
27IEEE Transactions on BroadcastingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States | 2.06Q2 | 2.58 0.07 up from 2010 | 312 | 8% | $2,645 | ||
28Digital Signal ProcessingElsevier BV · United States | 1.95Q2 | 2.05 0.50 up from 2010 | 339 | 3% | $2,580 | ||
29Journal of Visual Communication and Image RepresentationElsevier BV · United States | 1.82Q2 | 2.08 0.42 up from 2010 | 216 | 11% | $2,450 | ||
30DCCInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States | 1.80Q2 | —no 2010 value | 72 | — | — | ||
31The Visual ComputerSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany | 1.68Q2 | 1.36 0.01 down from 2010 | 325 | 18% | $3,190 | ||
32EURASIP Journal on Image and Video ProcessingOASpringer Nature · Germany | 1.62Q2 | 1.28 0.58 down from 2010 | 149 | 100% | $1,790 | ||
33Computer Science and Information SystemsOAComSIS Consortium · Serbia | 1.60Q2 | 1.49 0.43 up from 2010 | 100 | 100% | — | ||
34Multidimensional Systems and Signal ProcessingSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands | 1.53Q2 | 1.28 0.45 down from 2010 | 86 | 22% | $3,190 | ||
35Multimedia SystemsSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany | 1.53Q2 | 1.09 0.57 down from 2010 | 133 | 20% | $3,490 | ||
36Pattern Analysis and ApplicationsSpringer Science+Business Media · United Kingdom | 1.53Q2 | 1.67 0.01 down from 2010 | 104 | 20% | $3,390 | ||
37IEEE MultimediaIEEE Computer Society · United States | 1.51Q2 | 0.98 0.25 down from 2010 | 236 | 9% | $2,995 | ||
38International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its ApplicationsAdvanced Institute of Convergence Information Technology Research Center · South Korea | 1.51Q2 | 1.98 1.43 up from 2010 | 308 | 1% | — | ||
39Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart EnvironmentsIOS Press · Netherlands | 1.46Q2 | 1.53 0.85 down from 2010 | 83 | 56% | $4,150 | ||
40Journal of Real-Time Image ProcessingSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany | 1.45Q2 | 1.54 0.05 up from 2010 | 107 | 25% | $3,290 | ||
41Multimedia Tools and ApplicationsSpringer Science+Business Media · United States | 1.45Q2 | 1.49 0.03 down from 2010 | 460 | 19% | $3,190 | ||
42International Journal of Digital Multimedia BroadcastingOAHindawi Publishing Corporation · United Kingdom | 1.45Q2 | 1.37 0.39 up from 2010 | 126 | 100% | $1,100 | ||
43Intelligent Service RoboticsSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany | 1.44Q2 | 1.30 0.44 down from 2010 | 75 | 26% | $3,190 | ||
44Machine Vision and ApplicationsSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany | 1.44Q2 | 1.30no change | 214 | 16% | $3,490 | ||
45Journal of New Music ResearchRoutledge · United Kingdom | 1.41Q2 | 0.82 0.85 down from 2010 | 85 | 18% | — | ||
46Optics and Lasers in EngineeringElsevier BV · Netherlands | 1.38Q2 | 2.06 0.05 up from 2010 | 544 | 8% | $4,020 | ||
47IET Image ProcessingOAInstitution of Engineering and Technology · United Kingdom | 1.38Q2 | 1.69 0.30 up from 2010 | 105 | 7% | $2,740 | ||
48International Journal of Digital Crime and ForensicsOAIGI Global · United States | 1.33Q3 | 1.18 0.58 up from 2010 | 40 | 14% | — | ||
49ELCVIA Electronic Letters on Computer Vision and Image AnalysisOAComputer Vision Center Press · Spain | 1.32Q3 | 1.09 0.26 up from 2010 | 40 | 100% | — | ||
50IET Computer VisionOAInstitution of Engineering and Technology · United States | 1.23Q3 | 1.63 0.46 up from 2010 | 68 | 12% | $2,510 |
Subfields of Computer Science, with Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition highlighted.
- Artificial Intelligence316
- Information Systems146
- Computer Networks and Communications99
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition93
- Computational Theory and Mathematics90
- Hardware and Architecture20
- Human-Computer Interaction17
- Computer Science Applications16
- Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design10
- Signal Processing8
- Software4
Journals
Citations made in 2011. Corpus-wide, 75.1% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.
46 additional Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2008–2010, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.
At a glance
Indicator year: 2011. Publication window: 2008–2010. How these summaries are calculated
- Ranked journals
- 93
- Window papers (baseline)
- 51,027 +25.6% from indicator year 2008
- Median OJR
- 1.375 +14.7% from indicator year 2008
- Rising journals (2025)
- 12
Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2008–2010 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.
| Measure | Year series | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranked journals | 51 | 54 | 58 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 69 | 77 | 90 | 94 | 97 | 93 | 111 | 116 | 119 | 116 | 120 | 120 | 123 | 131 | 131 | 134 | 129 | 123 | 123 | 120 | |
| Window papers (baseline) | 18,704 | 19,730 | 20,541 | 22,521 | 25,597 | 28,246 | 31,945 | 35,370 | 40,623 | 44,201 | 47,518 | 51,027 | 56,118 | 61,010 | 65,923 | 70,037 | 72,265 | 71,593 | 70,424 | 71,721 | 76,922 | 84,299 | 92,271 | 98,347 | 105,326 | 115,071 | |
| Median OJR | 0.88 | 1.06 | 1.13 | 1.143 | 1.141 | 1.15 | 1.27 | 1.19 | 1.20 | 1.28 | 1.385 | 1.375 | 0.980 | 1.003 | 0.979 | 0.91 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.698 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.696 |
How to read these rankings
- OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
- A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
- Quartiles
- Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
- Impact factor (2-year)
- Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
- Rank ranges
- Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.