OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2010

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2010

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition journal rankings 2010

97 ranked journals · Subfield in Computer Science

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition has 97 ranked journals in 2010. The median OJR rose 0.11 on 2009 to 1.38, above the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 2.14. The top three are IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, International Journal of Computer Vision, and SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2010. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2007–2009, the window the 2010 score is computed on.

97
12% of Computer Science
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.38+0.11 vs 2009
This subfieldAll 0.93World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

14%
All fields: 20%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,090
Median positive listed APC: $3,090 among 48 journals. 49 have no known price. All fields: $3,490.

Subfields of Computer Science (11)

97 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition ranking, 2010

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2009. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2007–2009, the window the 2010 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2007–2009 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2001 to 2010.

Compare
8.95Q17.82 0.07 up from 200980316%$2,645
2International Journal of Computer VisionSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
7.72Q16.16 1.87 down from 200929228%$4,090
3SIAM Journal on Imaging SciencesSociety for Industrial and Applied Mathematics · United States
6.75Q17.59 3.11 up from 20097620%—
4Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/ProceedingsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
5.28Q1—no 2009 value749——
5Computer Vision and Image UnderstandingElsevier BV · United States
5.27Q15.31 0.51 up from 200928718%$2,090
6Computer Graphics ForumWiley · Netherlands
4.22Q13.56 0.19 down from 200956320%$3,710
4.16Q10.95 3.99 down from 200926921%—
8Robotics and Autonomous SystemsElsevier BV · Netherlands
4.15Q13.19 0.24 up from 200931513%$3,140
9IEEE Transactions on Image ProcessingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
4.13Q14.20 0.65 down from 200986713%$2,645
10IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer GraphicsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
3.90Q13.52 0.27 down from 200961010%$2,645
11IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video TechnologyInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
3.90Q13.46 1.47 down from 20096406%$2,645
12Autonomous RobotsSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
3.68Q13.70 0.89 up from 200913639%$3,990
13IEEE Transactions on MultimediaInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
3.58Q13.45 0.26 down from 200945610%$2,645
14Pattern RecognitionElsevier BV · United Kingdom
3.33Q13.52 0.15 up from 20091,04811%$2,590
15IEEE Intelligent Vehicles SymposiumInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
3.31Q1—no 2009 value200——
16ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and ApplicationsAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
3.30Q13.27 0.07 down from 20098514%—
17ProceedingsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
2.80Q1—no 2009 value46——
18Image and Vision ComputingElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.60Q13.04 0.85 up from 20094098%$2,100
2.58Q12.38no 2009 value4761%$4,150—
20Pattern Recognition LettersElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.43Q12.57 0.19 up from 200974915%$2,500
21IEEE Transactions on BroadcastingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
2.40Q12.50 0.32 down from 20093319%$2,645
22Signal Processing Image CommunicationElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.35Q12.46 0.69 up from 200921411%$2,470
23Proceedings - International Conference on Image ProcessingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
2.29Q1—no 2009 value140——
24IEEE Computer Graphics and ApplicationsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
2.21Q11.65 0.03 up from 20093276%$2,995
25IEEE Signal Processing LettersInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
2.14Q12.00 0.14 down from 20098628%$2,645
2.11Q21.65 0.49 down from 200918812%$2,450
27Multimedia SystemsSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
2.05Q21.66 0.13 up from 200911918%$3,490
28Information VisualizationSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
2.03Q22.57 0.04 up from 200910213%$4,150
29Journal of Mathematical Imaging and VisionSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
2.02Q22.21 0.03 down from 200918528%$3,090
30IEEE MultimediaIEEE Computer Society · United States
2.01Q21.23 0.46 down from 20092508%$2,995
31Journal of Visual Languages & ComputingElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.96Q21.92 0.09 up from 2009923%—
32Signal ProcessingElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.96Q22.28 0.49 up from 20098589%$3,190
33ProceedingsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
1.95Q2—no 2009 value46——
34IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in BiomedicineInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
1.91Q23.09 0.11 up from 200938318%—
35Machine Intelligence ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · United Kingdom
1.90Q21.75 0.05 up from 20091574%$3,190
36International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition (IJDAR)Springer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.86Q21.98 0.70 down from 20096519%$3,090
37Intelligent Service RoboticsSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.81Q21.74 0.33 down from 20095526%$3,190
38The Visual ComputerSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.76Q21.37 0.06 down from 200930325%$3,190
39Computers & GraphicsElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.67Q21.61 0.42 up from 200926115%$2,770
40ProceedingsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
1.63Q2—no 2009 value127——
41Multimedia Tools and ApplicationsSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
1.58Q21.52 0.16 down from 200932320%$3,190
42International Journal of BiometricsInderscience Publishers · United Kingdom
1.56Q22.00 0.07 down from 2009348%—
43Machine Vision and ApplicationsSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.55Q21.29 0.34 down from 200923222%$3,490
44Computer Science and Information SystemsOAComSIS Consortium · Serbia
1.54Q21.05 0.39 down from 200950100%—
45Pattern Analysis and ApplicationsSpringer Science+Business Media · United Kingdom
1.50Q21.68 0.20 up from 200911626%$3,390
46Optics and Lasers in EngineeringElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.49Q22.02 0.48 up from 200946610%$4,020
47Digital Signal ProcessingElsevier BV · United States
1.45Q21.55 0.21 up from 20093176%$2,580
48Journal of Real-Time Image ProcessingSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.40Q21.49no change11410%$3,290
49DCCInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
1.38Q20.78 0.43 down from 200972——
50Journal of New Music ResearchRoutledge · United Kingdom
1.36Q31.67 0.54 down from 2009759%—

Citations made in 2010. Corpus-wide, 73.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

46 additional Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2007–2009, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2010. Publication window: 2007–2009. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
97
Window papers (baseline)
47,518 +34.3% from indicator year 2007
Median OJR
1.385 +16.2% from indicator year 2007
Rising journals (2025)
12

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2007–2009 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals515458606162697790949793111116119116120120123131131134129123123120
Window papers (baseline)18,70419,73020,54122,52125,59728,24631,94535,37040,62344,20147,51851,02756,11861,01065,92370,03772,26571,59370,42471,72176,92284,29992,27198,347105,326115,071
Median OJR0.881.061.131.1431.1411.151.271.191.201.281.3851.3750.9801.0030.9790.910.740.730.640.6980.720.750.690.770.760.696

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.