OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2015

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2015

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition journal rankings 2015

116 ranked journals · Subfield in Computer Science

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition has 116 ranked journals in 2015. The median OJR fell 0.07 on 2014 to 0.91, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.88. The top three are IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, International Journal of Computer Vision, and Autonomous Robots.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2015. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2012–2014, the window the 2015 score is computed on.

116
11% of Computer Science
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.91-0.07 vs 2014
This subfieldAll 0.88World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

25%
All fields: 29%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$2,995
Median positive listed APC: $2,995 among 55 journals. 61 have no known price. All fields: $3,390.

Subfields of Computer Science (11)

116 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition ranking, 2015

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2014. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2012–2014, the window the 2015 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2012–2014 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2006 to 2015.

Compare
9.95Q19.14 0.13 up from 201473929%$2,645
2International Journal of Computer VisionSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
7.99Q110.91 3.49 up from 201426035%$4,090
3Autonomous RobotsSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
5.96Q15.55 0.70 up from 201414027%$3,990
4IEEE Transactions on Image ProcessingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
4.75Q15.37 0.67 down from 20141,34121%$2,645
5IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video TechnologyInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
4.72Q14.19 2.38 down from 201459716%$2,645
6IEEE Transactions on MultimediaInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
4.11Q15.30 0.13 up from 201452221%$2,645
7Image Processing On LineOAImage Processing On Line · France
3.91Q13.46 1.38 down from 201452100%—
8Pattern RecognitionElsevier BV · United Kingdom
3.75Q14.05 0.11 down from 20141,06319%$2,590
9IEEE MultimediaIEEE Computer Society · United States
3.31Q12.33 0.66 down from 201415522%$2,995
10Robotics and Autonomous SystemsElsevier BV · Netherlands
3.28Q13.87 0.33 up from 201446830%$3,140
11SIAM Journal on Imaging SciencesSociety for Industrial and Applied Mathematics · United States
3.24Q14.29 0.52 up from 201424048%—
12Image and Vision ComputingElsevier BV · Netherlands
3.01Q13.58 0.42 up from 201427722%$2,100
13IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in BiomedicineInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
3.00Q1—no 2014 value1160%—
14Computer Vision and Image UnderstandingElsevier BV · United States
2.94Q14.11 0.75 up from 201434630%$2,090
15IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer GraphicsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
2.83Q13.77 0.10 up from 201479620%$2,645
16Computer Graphics ForumWiley · Netherlands
2.75Q12.99 0.18 down from 201475621%$3,710
17Pattern Recognition LettersElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.45Q13.09 0.39 up from 201485725%$2,500
18Signal ProcessingElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.45Q13.13 0.23 up from 20141,12817%$3,190
19Journal on Computing and Cultural HeritageAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
2.38Q11.76 0.34 down from 20145232%—
20IEEE Signal Processing LettersInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
2.29Q12.71 0.37 down from 20141,17522%$2,645
21ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and ApplicationsAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
2.28Q13.38 0.63 up from 201415821%—
22EURASIP Journal on Image and Video ProcessingOASpringer Nature · Germany
2.27Q13.15 0.52 up from 2014140100%$1,790
23Signal Processing Image CommunicationElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.20Q12.73 0.36 up from 201431913%$2,470
24International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition (IJDAR)Springer Science+Business Media · Germany
2.15Q12.43 0.12 up from 20145312%$3,090
2.02Q12.94 0.46 up from 20144167%$2,450
26IEEE Transactions on BroadcastingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
1.95Q13.79 0.66 up from 201424420%$2,645
27International Journal of Multimedia Information RetrievalSpringer Science+Business Media · United Kingdom
1.95Q11.80 1.66 down from 20147030%$3,090
28Computers & GraphicsElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.91Q11.99 0.28 up from 201434219%$2,770
29Machine Vision and ApplicationsSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.88Q12.03 0.08 up from 201429822%$3,490
1.75Q21.17 0.40 down from 2014300%—
31Optics and Lasers in EngineeringElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.63Q22.66 0.12 up from 20146557%$4,020
32Frontiers in NeuroroboticsOAFrontiers Media · Switzerland
1.60Q22.78 1.85 down from 201466100%$3,801
33Journal of Mathematical Imaging and VisionSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.56Q22.14 0.04 down from 201421833%$3,090
34Digital Signal ProcessingElsevier BV · United States
1.56Q21.98 0.16 up from 201458216%$2,580
35Computer Science and Information SystemsOAComSIS Consortium · Serbia
1.54Q21.71 0.16 up from 2014223100%—
36The Visual ComputerSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.53Q21.89 0.25 up from 201437016%$3,190
37Intelligent Service RoboticsSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.53Q21.83 0.31 up from 20145920%$3,190
38Journal of Visual Languages & ComputingElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.44Q21.55 0.32 up from 201415520%—
39Multimedia SystemsSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.41Q21.85 0.29 up from 20141809%$3,490
40Machine Intelligence ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · United Kingdom
1.39Q21.49 0.54 down from 201422913%$3,190
41Journal of RoboticsOAHindawi Publishing Corporation · United Kingdom
1.35Q20.88 1.15 down from 201456100%$1,100
42DisplaysElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.28Q22.41 0.52 up from 201413910%$2,450
43Paladyn Journal of Behavioral RoboticsOADe Gruyter Open · Poland
1.26Q22.19 0.45 up from 201447100%$1,187
44IEEE Computer Graphics and ApplicationsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
1.25Q21.41 0.01 down from 201424917%$2,995
45Pattern Analysis and ApplicationsSpringer Science+Business Media · United Kingdom
1.25Q21.31 0.04 down from 201417524%$3,390
1.22Q21.41 2.97 down from 2014950%—
47IET Image ProcessingOAInstitution of Engineering and Technology · United Kingdom
1.19Q21.61 0.16 down from 201435731%$2,740
48Journal of Real-Time Image ProcessingSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.17Q21.38 0.15 down from 201423327%$3,290
49IET Computer VisionOAInstitution of Engineering and Technology · United States
1.14Q21.13 0.68 down from 201421224%$2,510
50Multidimensional Systems and Signal ProcessingSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.10Q21.18 0.14 up from 201412712%$3,190

Citations made in 2015. Corpus-wide, 78.1% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

49 additional Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2012–2014, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2015. Publication window: 2012–2014. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
116
Window papers (baseline)
70,037 +24.8% from indicator year 2012
Median OJR
0.91 -7.6% from indicator year 2012
Rising journals (2025)
12

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2012–2014 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals515458606162697790949793111116119116120120123131131134129123123120
Window papers (baseline)18,70419,73020,54122,52125,59728,24631,94535,37040,62344,20147,51851,02756,11861,01065,92370,03772,26571,59370,42471,72176,92284,29992,27198,347105,326115,071
Median OJR0.881.061.131.1431.1411.151.271.191.201.281.3851.3750.9801.0030.9790.910.740.730.640.6980.720.750.690.770.760.696

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.