OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2009

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2009

Artificial Intelligence journal rankings 2009

280 ranked journals · Subfield in Computer Science

Artificial Intelligence has 280 ranked journals in 2009. Its median journal scores above the world average: OJR 1.32 against 1.00, down 0.01 on 2008. A journal needs OJR 2.59 to reach Q1. The top three are ACM Computing Surveys, Journal of Web Semantics, and Computational Linguistics.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2009. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2006–2008, the window the 2009 score is computed on.

280
37% of Computer Science
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.32-0.01 vs 2008
This subfieldAll 0.92World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

18%
All fields: 18%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,090
Median positive listed APC: $3,090 among 126 journals. 154 have no known price. All fields: $3,510.

Subfields of Computer Science (11)

280 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Artificial Intelligence ranking, 2009

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2008. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2006–2008, the window the 2009 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2006–2008 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2009.

Compare
1ACM Computing SurveysAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
36.34Q122.18 1.70 down from 20084110%—
2Journal of Web SemanticsOAElsevier BV · Netherlands
11.67Q111.45 2.94 up from 20087812%$1,700
3Computational LinguisticsOAAssociation for Computational Linguistics · United States
9.84Q17.72 2.05 up from 200810472%—
4ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from DataAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
7.73Q17.84 0.09 down from 2008327%—
5IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary ComputationInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
7.55Q16.46 0.39 up from 20082099%$2,645
6ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive SystemsAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
7.50Q14.33 1.96 down from 20084710%—
7Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent SystemsSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
7.14Q13.55 0.84 down from 200810131%$3,290
8Proceedings of the VLDB EndowmentAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
7.10Q15.21no 2008 value1678%——
9The VLDB JournalSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
7.01Q15.82 0.75 up from 200812421%$2,990
10Communications of the ACMAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
6.70Q14.22 0.24 up from 200888620%—
11IEEE Internet ComputingIEEE Computer Society · United States
5.83Q13.45 0.78 up from 200835814%$2,995
12Journal of CryptologySpringer Science+Business Media · United States
5.82Q14.46 1.26 up from 200863100%$3,190
13The Knowledge Engineering ReviewCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
5.69Q12.88 1.02 up from 20086947%$3,550
14Data Mining and Knowledge DiscoverySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
5.67Q14.36 0.45 down from 200810219%$3,190
5.59Q14.17 0.03 up from 20084425%—
16Service Oriented Computing and ApplicationsSpringer Science+Business Media · United Kingdom
5.58Q12.45 1.10 down from 20083317%$3,390
17Machine LearningSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
5.53Q13.55 1.16 down from 200815599%$3,290
18IEEE Transactions on Information TheoryInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
5.51Q14.76 1.20 down from 20081,36020%$2,645
19Journal of Information ScienceSAGE Publishing · United States
5.32Q12.44 0.91 down from 200818013%$3,650
20ProceedingsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
5.29Q1—no 2008 value148——
21IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B (Cybernetics)Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
5.28Q14.71 0.43 up from 200849712%—
22IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data EngineeringIEEE Computer Society · United States
5.21Q13.36 0.06 down from 20085997%$2,645
23Artificial IntelligenceElsevier BV · Netherlands
5.11Q14.79 0.71 up from 2008202100%$4,260
24IEEE Pervasive ComputingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
5.05Q13.59 0.06 up from 200823411%$2,995
25IEEE MicroInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
5.00Q13.74 0.93 up from 20083074%$2,995
26Journal of Artificial Intelligence ResearchOAAI Access Foundation · United States
4.98Q13.48 1.41 down from 2008147100%—
27IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal ProcessingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
4.95Q15.95 2.50 up from 200816315%$2,645
28IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and SecurityInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
4.91Q14.92 0.58 up from 20082116%$2,645
4.90Q14.10 1.26 up from 2008520%—
30IEEE Intelligent SystemsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
4.82Q13.14 0.13 down from 20083298%$2,995
31ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and SystemsAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
4.76Q13.23 0.57 down from 200810670%—
32Information Processing & ManagementElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.70Q13.60 1.18 up from 20083116%$3,670
33IEEE Transactions on Neural NetworksInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
4.65Q14.22 1.00 down from 20085567%—
34Natural Language EngineeringCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
4.61Q12.90 0.47 up from 20086348%—
35IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C (Applications and Reviews)Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
4.55Q14.26 1.23 up from 20083006%—
36ACM Transactions on Speech and Language ProcessingAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
4.52Q13.70 1.04 up from 2008300%—
37Proceedings - Symposium on Logic in Computer ScienceInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
4.51Q12.53no 2008 value40———
38Evolutionary ComputationThe MIT Press · United States
4.39Q14.88 1.00 up from 20087236%—
39IEEE Signal Processing MagazineInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
4.32Q14.51 1.60 up from 200849517%—
40Mobile Networks and ApplicationsSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
4.23Q12.57 2.60 down from 200816617%$3,790
41Information RetrievalSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
4.11Q13.33 0.60 up from 200810442%$1,520
42ACM Transactions on Computational LogicAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
3.86Q13.21 0.64 down from 20087931%—
3.86Q11.32 0.54 down from 2008450%—
44TechnometricsTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
3.77Q13.18 0.64 down from 200840811%—
45Journal of Automated ReasoningSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
3.74Q14.60 1.58 up from 20089321%$3,190
46IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure ComputingIEEE Computer Society · United States
3.73Q12.17 0.81 down from 200815710%$2,645
47Data & Knowledge EngineeringElsevier BV · Netherlands
3.72Q13.13 0.88 up from 20082787%$3,000
48Journal of Computer SecurityIOS Press · Netherlands
3.63Q12.89 0.41 up from 20089520%$4,150
49Information SciencesElsevier BV · United States
3.56Q13.91 0.07 up from 20088705%$3,200
50International Journal on Digital LibrariesSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
3.54Q11.97 0.53 down from 20085025%$2,990

Citations made in 2009. Corpus-wide, 71.4% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

138 additional Artificial Intelligence journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2006–2008, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2009. Publication window: 2006–2008. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
280
Window papers (baseline)
108,467 +33.4% from indicator year 2006
Median OJR
1.32 -5.5% from indicator year 2006
Rising journals (2025)
33

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2006–2008 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals136142165172188196203221248280296316339367387404405422433448459456475483499484
Window papers (baseline)40,05744,20649,86757,19864,84472,58981,32990,526100,469108,467113,627117,909121,850124,838126,803128,094127,939126,230127,012133,222146,316162,805180,943194,824213,310242,477
Median OJR1.0021.141.171.221.161.361.401.371.331.321.421.271.231.151.121.020.950.8750.840.8820.790.8780.890.850.800.81

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.