OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2016

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2016

Artificial Intelligence journal rankings 2016

405 ranked journals · Subfield in Computer Science

Artificial Intelligence has 405 ranked journals in 2016. The median OJR fell 0.07 on 2015 to 0.95, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.92. The top three are ACM Computing Surveys, Journal Of Big Data, and Journal of Statistical Software.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2016. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2013–2015, the window the 2016 score is computed on.

405
39% of Computer Science
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.95-0.07 vs 2015
This subfieldAll 0.86World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

31%
All fields: 30%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,040
Median positive listed APC: $3,040 among 170 journals. 235 have no known price. All fields: $3,390.

Subfields of Computer Science (11)

405 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Artificial Intelligence ranking, 2016

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2015. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2013–2015, the window the 2016 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2013–2015 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2007 to 2016.

Compare
1ACM Computing SurveysAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
14.47Q114.89 0.74 up from 201521330%—
2Journal Of Big DataOASpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
11.89Q110.13 3.38 up from 201532100%$2,290
3Journal of Statistical SoftwareOAFoundation for Open Access Statistics · United States
10.29Q114.95 11.16 up from 2015256100%—
4ACM SIGKDD Explorations NewsletterAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
8.82Q16.33 4.97 down from 2015350%—
5IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary ComputationInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
8.29Q18.28 0.08 up from 201521820%$2,645
6Transactions of the Association for Computational LinguisticsOAAssociation for Computational Linguistics
7.44Q110.59 3.58 up from 2015133100%—
7Computational LinguisticsOAAssociation for Computational Linguistics · United States
6.43Q14.50 2.29 down from 20157593%—
8ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and TechnologyAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
5.74Q16.12 0.98 up from 201521926%—
9IEEE Signal Processing MagazineInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
5.70Q16.45 0.04 up from 201539216%—
10IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning SystemsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
5.23Q17.33 0.87 up from 201590219%$2,645
11Information FusionElsevier BV · Netherlands
5.20Q16.57 1.78 up from 201520725%$4,740
12IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data EngineeringIEEE Computer Society · United States
5.19Q14.76 0.11 down from 201558916%$2,645
13Proceedings of the VLDB EndowmentAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
5.13Q15.54 0.30 up from 201568721%—
14Big Data ResearchElsevier BV · United States
5.04Q13.91 1.34 up from 2015758%$2,840
15Knowledge-Based SystemsElsevier BV · Netherlands
4.84Q15.50 0.69 up from 201598413%$3,430
16Computers & SecurityElsevier BV · Netherlands
4.67Q14.21 0.60 up from 201528531%$3,100
17ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and SystemsAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
4.59Q15.16 2.16 up from 2015447%—
18Expert Systems with ApplicationsElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.49Q15.13 0.16 up from 20152,08522%$3,500
19The VLDB JournalSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
4.45Q14.01 0.28 down from 201511017%$2,990
20IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and SecurityInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
4.39Q15.86 1.22 up from 201574614%$2,645
21IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal ProcessingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
4.38Q15.92 0.08 up from 201541632%$2,645
22Information SciencesElsevier BV · United States
4.31Q15.83 0.72 up from 20152,03720%$3,200
23IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure ComputingIEEE Computer Society · United States
4.13Q13.62 0.24 down from 201522614%$2,645
24Journal of Web SemanticsOAElsevier BV · Netherlands
4.12Q13.57 0.92 down from 20159339%$1,700
25Journal of Artificial Intelligence ResearchOAAI Access Foundation · United States
4.11Q14.07 0.02 down from 2015178100%—
26CorporaEdinburgh University Press · United Kingdom
4.05Q12.08 0.60 down from 20153527%—
27IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in ComputingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
4.05Q14.44 0.58 down from 201519723%$2,645
28Archives of Computational Methods in EngineeringSpringer Science+Business Media · Spain
3.87Q14.95 1.68 up from 20157631%$4,690
29Information Processing & ManagementElsevier BV · United Kingdom
3.87Q14.24 1.41 up from 201518915%$3,670
30Semantic WebIOS Press · Netherlands
3.85Q15.52 2.39 up from 201512258%—
31Neural NetworksElsevier BV · United Kingdom
3.80Q16.88 1.63 up from 201548920%$3,110
32Applied Soft ComputingElsevier BV · Netherlands
3.62Q14.86 0.50 up from 20151,54914%$3,730
33Communications of the ACMAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
3.62Q12.93 1.00 down from 201584926%—
34IEEE Transactions on Signal ProcessingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
3.58Q14.87 0.30 up from 20151,85234%$2,645
35ACM Transactions on Management Information SystemsAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
3.55Q12.81 0.22 down from 20156013%—
36IEEE Intelligent SystemsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
3.52Q12.27 2.44 down from 201526011%$2,995
37Information SystemsElsevier BV · Netherlands
3.50Q13.53 0.96 up from 201528831%$3,410
38Artificial IntelligenceElsevier BV · Netherlands
3.44Q12.97 1.18 down from 2015220100%$4,260
39ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent SystemsAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
3.41Q14.09 1.59 up from 20156126%—
40IEEE Computational Intelligence MagazineInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
3.35Q13.09 0.94 up from 201521714%—
3.30Q14.15 0.64 up from 201559019%$3,200
42IEEE Transactions on Computational Social SystemsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
3.29Q13.57 0.92 up from 2015309%$2,645
43ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from DataAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
3.27Q13.99 0.36 up from 20159933%—
44IEEE Transactions on ComputersInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
3.16Q13.22 0.07 up from 201573314%$2,645
45Integrated Computer-Aided EngineeringIOS Press · Netherlands
3.13Q15.85 0.28 up from 20158944%$4,400
46Mobile Networks and ApplicationsSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
3.10Q14.69 0.02 up from 201519722%$3,790
47ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive SystemsAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
3.04Q13.32 0.06 down from 20156429%—
48Journal of Open Research SoftwareOAUbiquity Press · United Kingdom
3.00Q13.87 0.51 up from 201554100%$490
49Data Mining and Knowledge DiscoverySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
2.95Q13.79 0.73 up from 201513733%$3,190
50Personal and Ubiquitous ComputingSpringer Science+Business Media · United Kingdom
2.95Q14.14 1.09 up from 201525723%$3,290

Citations made in 2016. Corpus-wide, 77.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

154 additional Artificial Intelligence journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2013–2015, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2016. Publication window: 2013–2015. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
405
Window papers (baseline)
127,939 +2.5% from indicator year 2013
Median OJR
0.95 -17.5% from indicator year 2013
Rising journals (2025)
33

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2013–2015 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals136142165172188196203221248280296316339367387404405422433448459456475483499484
Window papers (baseline)40,05744,20649,86757,19864,84472,58981,32990,526100,469108,467113,627117,909121,850124,838126,803128,094127,939126,230127,012133,222146,316162,805180,943194,824213,310242,477
Median OJR1.0021.141.171.221.161.361.401.371.331.321.421.271.231.151.121.020.950.8750.840.8820.790.8780.890.850.800.81

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.