OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2008

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2008

Obstetrics and Gynecology journal rankings 2008

45 ranked journals · Subfield in Medicine

Obstetrics and Gynecology has 45 ranked journals in 2008. The median journal has an OJR of 0.62, below the world average of 1.00, down 0.04 on 2007; Q1 starts at OJR 0.93. The top three are Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2008. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2005–2007, the window the 2008 score is computed on.

45
2% of Medicine
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.62-0.04 vs 2007
This subfieldAll 0.89World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

22%
All fields: 17%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,622
Median positive listed APC: $3,622 among 22 journals. Another 1 lists $0; 22 have no known price. All fields: $3,540.

Subfields of Medicine (42)

Show all 42 subfields

45 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Obstetrics and Gynecology ranking, 2008

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2007. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2005–2007, the window the 2008 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2005–2007 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2008.

Compare
1Obstetrics and GynecologyLippincott Williams & Wilkins · Netherlands
2.14Q13.76 0.21 down from 20071,6339%—
1.81Q13.50 0.10 down from 20072,09942%$5,410
3Obstetrical & Gynecological SurveyLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
1.78Q13.15 0.22 down from 20072291%—
1.70Q13.24 0.24 down from 20071,03016%$5,190
5BirthWiley · United States
1.40Q12.72 0.08 up from 200714918%$4,850
6Gynecologic OncologyElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.35Q13.17 0.35 up from 20071,62915%$4,380
7PlacentaElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.30Q13.04 0.12 up from 200740821%$3,720
8International Journal of Gynecological PathologyLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
1.23Q12.54 0.69 up from 20071846%—
9Journal of Minimally Invasive GynecologyElsevier BV · United States
1.13Q11.97 0.17 down from 20073923%$3,000
10Hypertension in PregnancyOAInforma · United States
0.96Q11.55 0.37 up from 20079510%—
0.94Q11.76no change85134%$3,060
0.93Q12.26 0.17 up from 2007171——
13BrachytherapyElsevier BV · United States
0.89Q22.08 0.34 up from 20071151%$3,000
0.87Q21.51 0.51 up from 200728411%$3,750
15American Journal of PerinatologyThieme Medical Publishers (Germany) · United States
0.87Q21.66 0.36 up from 20072686%—
0.86Q21.66 0.36 up from 200737017%$3,920
17Journal of Perinatal MedicineOADe Gruyter · Germany
0.84Q21.62 0.21 up from 200730922%$0 listed
18BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
0.82Q21.76 0.04 down from 200789100%$3,290
0.80Q21.61 0.10 up from 200742022%—
0.79Q21.33 0.13 down from 20079789%$3,440
0.75Q21.24 0.04 down from 200798111%$4,480
22MidwiferyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
0.65Q20.94 0.21 down from 200721111%$3,630
0.62Q21.31 0.27 up from 20071,78093%$3,800
24MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child NursingLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
0.57Q30.72 0.10 down from 20072041%—
0.57Q31.04 0.03 down from 20074151%$3,100
26Archives of Gynecology and ObstetricsOASpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.51Q30.87 0.05 up from 20075634%$4,590
27Women and BirthElsevier BV · Netherlands
0.44Q30.74 0.53 up from 2007382%$3,613
0.37Q30.61 0.22 up from 200710198%—
29Journal of Obstetrics and GynaecologyOAInforma · United Kingdom
0.35Q30.56 0.02 down from 20079085%$2,390
30Current Obstetrics and GynaecologyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
0.32Q30.48 0.14 up from 200793——
31Obstetrics Gynaecology & Reproductive MedicineElsevier BV · United Kingdom
0.31Q30.40no 2007 value553%$2,800—
0.30Q30.74 0.08 up from 20074470%—
33European Clinics in Obstetrics and GynaecologySpringer Nature · United Kingdom
0.28Q30.50 0.14 up from 2007730%—
34Current Women s Health ReviewsBentham Science Publishers · Netherlands
0.17Q30.33 0.05 up from 2007896%—
35The Obstetrician & GynaecologistWiley · United Kingdom
0.17Q40.32 0.03 up from 20071426%$2,900
36Revista Brasileira Ginecologia e ObstetríciaOAThieme Medical Publishers (Germany) · Brazil
0.14Q40.16 0.02 down from 2007444100%—
0.14Q4—no 2007 value34——
38Gynecological SurgerySpringer Nature · Germany
0.12Q40.23 0.03 down from 200724748%$1,790
39British Journal of MidwiferyMark Allen Group · United Kingdom
0.11Q40.22 0.04 up from 20075002%—
40Journal of Gynecologic SurgeryMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
0.05Q40.09 0.02 up from 2007893%—
0.04Q40.09 0.02 up from 20071480%—
42Geburtshilfe und FrauenheilkundeThieme Medical Publishers (Germany) · Germany
0.02Q40.04 0.02 down from 20071,9300%—
43Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und NeonatologieThieme Medical Publishers (Germany) · Germany
0.02Q40.03 0.01 up from 20071,7000%—
44Obstetrics & Gynecology ScienceOAIndonesian Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology · South Korea
0.02Q40.03 0.01 up from 20071,0850%—
45Journal of Gynecologic OncologyOAKorean Society of Gynecologic Oncology · South Korea
0.00Q40.00no change3498%—

Citations made in 2008. Corpus-wide, 71.1% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

9 additional Obstetrics and Gynecology journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2005–2007, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2008. Publication window: 2005–2007. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
45
Window papers (baseline)
15,592 +35.0% from indicator year 2005
Median OJR
0.62 +0.5% from indicator year 2005
Rising journals (2025)
8

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2005–2007 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals3135363938414144454443485555586164687374798388908581
Window papers (baseline)7,3318,6229,83710,59710,87811,55012,94814,42815,59216,84818,48120,75022,26523,47124,72126,26127,57228,32729,34730,95732,56538,23544,47850,23450,95950,060
Median OJR0.500.510.650.590.5970.6150.640.6570.620.670.8560.8640.8180.8190.850.730.740.760.690.6600.6040.540.5270.5320.560.614

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.