OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2009

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2009

Obstetrics and Gynecology journal rankings 2009

44 ranked journals · Subfield in Medicine

Obstetrics and Gynecology has 44 ranked journals in 2009. The median journal has an OJR of 0.67, below the world average of 1.00, up 0.05 on 2008; Q1 starts at OJR 1.10. The top three are Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Gynecologic Oncology.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2009. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2006–2008, the window the 2009 score is computed on.

44
2% of Medicine
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.67+0.05 vs 2008
This subfieldAll 0.92World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

23%
All fields: 18%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,622
Median positive listed APC: $3,622 among 22 journals. Another 1 lists $0; 21 have no known price. All fields: $3,510.

Subfields of Medicine (42)

Show all 42 subfields

44 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Obstetrics and Gynecology ranking, 2009

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2008. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2006–2008, the window the 2009 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2006–2008 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2009.

Compare
1Obstetrics and GynecologyLippincott Williams & Wilkins · Netherlands
2.14Q13.72 0.04 down from 20081,51910%—
1.96Q13.66 0.16 up from 20082,03544%$5,410
3Gynecologic OncologyElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.73Q14.15 0.98 up from 20081,42118%$4,380
1.71Q13.17 0.06 down from 200898118%$5,190
5Obstetrical & Gynecological SurveyLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
1.63Q13.11 0.04 down from 20082341%—
6BirthWiley · United States
1.63Q12.64 0.08 down from 200815017%$4,850
7BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
1.43Q12.88 1.12 up from 2008128100%$3,290
8PlacentaElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.39Q13.16 0.11 up from 200843125%$3,720
9International Journal of Gynecological PathologyLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
1.32Q12.74 0.20 up from 20082072%—
10Journal of Minimally Invasive GynecologyElsevier BV · United States
1.20Q12.08 0.12 up from 200848037%$3,000
1.10Q1—no 2008 value77——
12Journal of Perinatal MedicineOADe Gruyter · Germany
1.09Q22.15 0.53 up from 200831554%$0 listed
1.06Q22.05 0.29 up from 200879838%$3,060
0.99Q21.72 0.06 up from 200838210%$3,920
15Hypertension in PregnancyOAInforma · United States
0.95Q21.80 0.25 up from 200810110%—
0.90Q21.32 0.19 down from 200829316%$3,750
0.89Q22.08 0.47 up from 200844112%—
0.86Q21.45 0.21 up from 20089652%$4,480
0.85Q21.56 0.23 up from 200878210%$3,440
20BrachytherapyElsevier BV · United States
0.78Q21.84 0.24 down from 20081314%$3,000
21American Journal of PerinatologyThieme Medical Publishers (Germany) · United States
0.74Q21.16 0.50 down from 20084157%—
0.69Q22.04 0.73 up from 20081,44899%$3,800
23MidwiferyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
0.64Q31.06 0.12 up from 20082475%$3,630
24Archives of Gynecology and ObstetricsOASpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.63Q31.10 0.23 up from 20087725%$4,590
0.62Q31.27 0.23 up from 20084533%$3,100
26MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child NursingLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
0.57Q30.81 0.09 up from 20082172%—
27Women and BirthElsevier BV · Netherlands
0.55Q30.83 0.09 up from 20086613%$3,613
0.40Q30.71 0.03 down from 20084651%—
29Journal of Obstetrics and GynaecologyOAInforma · United Kingdom
0.40Q30.75 0.19 up from 20088823%$2,390
0.36Q30.66 0.04 up from 2008103100%—
31Current Obstetrics and GynaecologyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
0.35Q3—no 2008 value48——
32European Clinics in Obstetrics and GynaecologySpringer Nature · United Kingdom
0.32Q30.38 0.12 down from 200859——
33Obstetrics Gynaecology & Reproductive MedicineElsevier BV · United Kingdom
0.28Q30.43 0.03 up from 20081238%$2,800
34The Obstetrician & GynaecologistWiley · United Kingdom
0.24Q40.52 0.20 up from 20081388%$2,900
35Revista Brasileira Ginecologia e ObstetríciaOAThieme Medical Publishers (Germany) · Brazil
0.18Q40.31 0.15 up from 2008396100%—
36British Journal of MidwiferyMark Allen Group · United Kingdom
0.15Q40.26 0.04 up from 20085124%—
37Gynecological SurgerySpringer Nature · Germany
0.15Q40.28 0.05 up from 200824856%$1,790
38Journal of Gynecologic OncologyOAKorean Society of Gynecologic Oncology · South Korea
0.13Q40.26 0.26 up from 200865100%—
39Current Women s Health ReviewsBentham Science Publishers · Netherlands
0.10Q40.25 0.08 down from 2008906%—
40Journal of Gynecologic SurgeryMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
0.06Q40.14 0.05 up from 2008870%—
0.04Q40.07 0.02 down from 20081440%—
42Obstetrics & Gynecology ScienceOAIndonesian Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology · South Korea
0.03Q40.05 0.01 up from 20089260%—
43Geburtshilfe und FrauenheilkundeThieme Medical Publishers (Germany) · Germany
0.02Q40.04no change2,8400%—
44Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und NeonatologieThieme Medical Publishers (Germany) · Germany
0.02Q40.04no change1,5820%—

Citations made in 2009. Corpus-wide, 71.4% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

15 additional Obstetrics and Gynecology journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2006–2008, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2009. Publication window: 2006–2008. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
44
Window papers (baseline)
16,848 +30.1% from indicator year 2006
Median OJR
0.67 +4.3% from indicator year 2006
Rising journals (2025)
8

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2006–2008 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals3135363938414144454443485555586164687374798388908581
Window papers (baseline)7,3318,6229,83710,59710,87811,55012,94814,42815,59216,84818,48120,75022,26523,47124,72126,26127,57228,32729,34730,95732,56538,23544,47850,23450,95950,060
Median OJR0.500.510.650.590.5970.6150.640.6570.620.670.8560.8640.8180.8190.850.730.740.760.690.6600.6040.540.5270.5320.560.614

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.