Journal rankings · indicator year 2010
Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.
Subfield ranking · 2010
Paleontology journal rankings 2010
64 ranked journals · Subfield in Earth and Planetary Sciences
Paleontology has 64 ranked journals in 2010. The median journal has an OJR of 0.73, below the world average of 1.00, up 0.02 on 2009; Q1 starts at OJR 1.21. The top three are Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, and Geobiology.
Ranks and citation indicators: 2010. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.
Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2007–2009, the window the 2010 score is computed on.
The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.
The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.
The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.
Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.
Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.
Subfields of Earth and Planetary Sciences (8)
64 ranked journals
Filters
Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest. | OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields. The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list. | Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field. ▲ or ▼ is the change from 2009. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. | Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2007–2009, the window the 2010 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked. | Share of the journal’s 2007–2009 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal. | List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed. | The line is the journal’s OJR from 2001 to 2010. | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1Journal of Anthropological ArchaeologyElsevier BV · United States | 3.12Q1 | 2.41 0.20 up from 2009 | 88 | 10% | $3,370 | ||
2Journal of Systematic PalaeontologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom | 2.44Q1 | 2.66 2.34 down from 2009 | 47 | 41% | — | ||
3GeobiologyWiley · United Kingdom | 2.35Q1 | 3.66 0.60 up from 2009 | 134 | 18% | $4,880 | ||
4PaleobiologyCambridge University Press · United Kingdom | 2.32Q1 | 3.21 0.64 up from 2009 | 136 | 7% | $3,550 | ||
5American AntiquityCambridge University Press · United States | 2.27Q1 | 2.01 0.30 up from 2009 | 136 | 10% | $3,550 | ||
6Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural HistoryAmerican Museum of Natural History · United States | 2.01Q1 | 3.39 1.34 down from 2009 | 42 | 82% | — | ||
7Cambridge Archaeological JournalCambridge University Press · United Kingdom | 1.98Q1 | 1.88 0.22 up from 2009 | 73 | 9% | $3,550 | ||
8Zoological Journal of the Linnean SocietyOxford University Press · United Kingdom | 1.69Q1 | 2.51 0.01 down from 2009 | 298 | 81% | $3,541 | ||
9Vegetation History and ArchaeobotanySpringer Science+Business Media · Germany | 1.45Q1 | 2.22 0.46 up from 2009 | 140 | 44% | $3,790 | ||
10PalaeontologyWiley · United Kingdom | 1.44Q1 | 2.04 0.93 down from 2009 | 267 | 53% | $5,000 | ||
11RadiocarbonCambridge University Press · United States | 1.41Q1 | 3.34 1.63 up from 2009 | 259 | 99% | $2,487 | ||
12PalaiosSociety for Sedimentary Geology · United States | 1.29Q1 | 1.92 0.22 up from 2009 | 234 | 6% | — | ||
13Acta Palaeontologica PolonicaOAInstitute of Paleobiology · Poland | 1.27Q1 | 2.02 0.40 up from 2009 | 146 | 100% | $23 | ||
14LethaiaOAWiley · Norway | 1.24Q1 | 2.02 0.01 up from 2009 | 165 | 18% | $3,300 | ||
15AntiquityCambridge University Press · United Kingdom | 1.23Q1 | 0.66 0.04 up from 2009 | 534 | 15% | $3,550 | ||
16Journal of AnatomyWiley · United Kingdom | 1.21Q1 | 2.63 0.47 up from 2009 | 485 | 91% | $4,050 | ||
17Cretaceous ResearchElsevier BV · United Kingdom | 1.18Q2 | 1.84 0.68 up from 2009 | 295 | 16% | $3,560 | ||
18PalaeoworldElsevier BV · Netherlands | 1.18Q2 | 1.43 0.07 up from 2009 | 86 | 2% | $3,000 | ||
19FaciesSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany | 1.10Q2 | 1.78 0.34 up from 2009 | 122 | 11% | $2,490 | ||
20Ichnos/Ichnos : an international journal for plant and animal tracesTaylor & Francis · Switzerland | 1.06Q2 | 1.05 0.02 down from 2009 | 52 | 0% | — | ||
21Journal of Vertebrate PaleontologyTaylor & Francis · United States | 1.03Q2 | 1.90 0.01 down from 2009 | 386 | 22% | — | ||
22Comptes Rendus PalevolOAMuséum national d'histoire naturelle · France | 0.96Q2 | 1.33 0.36 up from 2009 | 175 | 41% | — | ||
23GeodiversitasOAMuséum national d'histoire naturelle · France | 0.94Q2 | 1.08 0.58 up from 2009 | 55 | 95% | — | ||
24Journal of MorphologyWiley · United States | 0.93Q2 | 1.50 0.28 down from 2009 | 323 | 8% | $4,220 | ||
25Environmental ArchaeologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom | 0.87Q2 | 0.58 0.05 down from 2009 | 43 | 33% | — | ||
26Latin American AntiquityCambridge University Press · United States | 0.85Q2 | 0.85 0.30 down from 2009 | 120 | 28% | $3,550 | ||
27Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of EdinburghCambridge University Press · United Kingdom | 0.85Q2 | 1.08 0.11 up from 2009 | 99 | 33% | $3,550 | ||
28Proceedings of the Geologists AssociationElsevier BV · United Kingdom | 0.84Q2 | 2.11 1.00 up from 2009 | 90 | 10% | $3,300 | ||
29The Anatomical RecordWiley · United States | 0.82Q2 | 1.74 0.10 down from 2009 | 552 | 61% | $4,430 | ||
30Journal of Mammalian EvolutionSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands | 0.75Q2 | 0.62 0.10 down from 2009 | 93 | 21% | $3,790 | ||
31Journal of Field ArchaeologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom | 0.74Q2 | 0.62 0.12 down from 2009 | 85 | 15% | — | ||
32Ancient MesoamericaCambridge University Press · United Kingdom | 0.74Q2 | 0.63 0.67 down from 2009 | 72 | 18% | $3,550 | ||
33StratigraphyUnited States | 0.73Q3 | 1.12 0.12 up from 2009 | 72 | 12% | — | ||
34GeobiosElsevier BV · France | 0.72Q3 | 1.01 0.01 down from 2009 | 200 | 11% | $3,030 | ||
35Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural HistoryUnited States | 0.72Q3 | 0.52 0.59 down from 2009 | 49 | 0% | — | ||
36Journal of PaleontologyCambridge University Press · United States | 0.69Q3 | 0.94 0.19 down from 2009 | 410 | 8% | $3,550 | ||
37Southeastern ArchaeologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom | 0.66Q3 | 0.68 0.15 up from 2009 | 94 | 0% | — | ||
38Norwegian Archaeological ReviewRoutledge · Norway | 0.65Q3 | 0.44 0.16 down from 2009 | 49 | 0% | — | ||
39Revista española de micropaleontologíaPublisher not listed | 0.63Q3 | 0.82 0.09 up from 2009 | 36 | 0% | — | ||
40Bulletin of GeosciencesOACzechia | 0.62Q3 | 1.09 0.13 up from 2009 | 123 | 98% | — | ||
41Historical BiologyTaylor & Francis · Switzerland | 0.61Q3 | 0.82 0.15 down from 2009 | 50 | 3% | — | ||
42Fossil recordOAWiley · Germany | 0.59Q3 | 1.06 0.35 up from 2009 | 151 | 100% | $1,240 | ||
43Annales de PaléontologieElsevier BV · France | 0.59Q3 | 0.94 0.07 up from 2009 | 49 | 6% | $2,800 | ||
44Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie - AbhandlungenE. Schweizerbart · Germany | 0.58Q3 | 0.91 0.08 up from 2009 | 280 | 8% | — | ||
45Senckenbergiana lethaeaSpringer Nature · Germany | 0.57Q3 | 0.95 0.38 up from 2009 | 35 | — | — | ||
46Alcheringa An Australasian Journal of PalaeontologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom | 0.54Q3 | 1.44 0.32 up from 2009 | 82 | 5% | — | ||
47Carnets de géologie (Notebooks on geology)OASociety for Sedimentary Geology · France | 0.54Q3 | 0.76 0.56 up from 2009 | 48 | 100% | — | ||
48Paläontologische ZeitschriftSpringer Nature · Germany | 0.53Q3 | 1.02 0.17 up from 2009 | 120 | 27% | $3,190 | ||
49Proceedings of the Prehistoric SocietyCambridge University Press · United Kingdom | 0.53Q4 | 0.28 0.37 down from 2009 | 45 | 24% | $3,550 | ||
50Revue de MicropaléontologieElsevier BV · France | 0.50Q4 | 0.47 0.14 down from 2009 | 84 | 7% | $2,470 |
Subfields of Earth and Planetary Sciences, with Paleontology highlighted.
- Geophysics132
- Atmospheric Science79
- Paleontology64
- Oceanography46
- Earth-Surface Processes13
- Geochemistry and Petrology8
- Geology7
- Space and Planetary Science2
Journals
Citations made in 2010. Corpus-wide, 73.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.
30 additional Paleontology journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2007–2009, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.
At a glance
Indicator year: 2010. Publication window: 2007–2009. How these summaries are calculated
- Ranked journals
- 64
- Window papers (baseline)
- 12,986 +18.9% from indicator year 2007
- Median OJR
- 0.7325 +12.6% from indicator year 2007
- Rising journals (2025)
- 5
Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2007–2009 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.
| Measure | Year series | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranked journals | 53 | 53 | 54 | 53 | 53 | 51 | 53 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 66 | 66 | 69 | 71 | 71 | 70 | 73 | 76 | 77 | 76 | 78 | 78 | 77 | 73 | 77 | |
| Window papers (baseline) | 7,057 | 7,924 | 8,570 | 9,199 | 9,500 | 9,801 | 10,405 | 10,925 | 11,640 | 12,204 | 12,986 | 13,788 | 14,602 | 15,085 | 15,876 | 16,591 | 17,958 | 18,584 | 19,596 | 19,477 | 19,946 | 19,760 | 20,309 | 19,925 | 19,964 | 19,466 | |
| Median OJR | 0.75 | 0.61 | 0.619 | 0.63 | 0.620 | 0.708 | 0.660 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.715 | 0.7325 | 0.735 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.829 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 0.79 | 0.832 | 0.831 | 0.78 | 0.7318 | 0.68 | 0.657 | 0.64 |
How to read these rankings
- OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
- A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
- Quartiles
- Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
- Impact factor (2-year)
- Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
- Rank ranges
- Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.