Journal rankings · indicator year 2013
Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.
Subfield ranking · 2013
Paleontology journal rankings 2013
69 ranked journals · Subfield in Earth and Planetary Sciences
Paleontology has 69 ranked journals in 2013. The median journal has an OJR of 0.81, below the world average of 1.00, up 0.02 on 2012; Q1 starts at OJR 1.24. The top three are Journal of World Prehistory, Geobiology, and Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History.
Ranks and citation indicators: 2013. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.
Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2010–2012, the window the 2013 score is computed on.
The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.
The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.
The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.
Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.
Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.
Subfields of Earth and Planetary Sciences (8)
69 ranked journals
Filters
Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest. | OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields. The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list. | Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field. ▲ or ▼ is the change from 2012. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. | Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2010–2012, the window the 2013 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked. | Share of the journal’s 2010–2012 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal. | List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed. | The line is the journal’s OJR from 2004 to 2013. | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1Journal of World PrehistorySpringer Nature · United States | 2.98Q1 | 2.55 0.38 up from 2012 | 30 | 0% | $3,290 | ||
2GeobiologyWiley · United Kingdom | 2.70Q1 | 4.60 0.54 up from 2012 | 114 | 22% | $4,880 | ||
3Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural HistoryAmerican Museum of Natural History · United States | 2.70Q1 | 7.60 3.92 up from 2012 | 42 | 67% | — | ||
4Journal of Anthropological ArchaeologyElsevier BV · United States | 2.53Q1 | 2.75 0.29 down from 2012 | 107 | 19% | $3,370 | ||
5Journal of Systematic PalaeontologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom | 1.91Q1 | 2.95 0.53 down from 2012 | 107 | 32% | — | ||
6Cambridge Archaeological JournalCambridge University Press · United Kingdom | 1.84Q1 | 1.52 0.43 down from 2012 | 66 | 15% | $3,550 | ||
7Zoological Journal of the Linnean SocietyOxford University Press · United Kingdom | 1.83Q1 | 3.11 0.32 up from 2012 | 302 | 58% | $3,541 | ||
8Journal of Field ArchaeologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom | 1.66Q1 | 1.69 0.49 up from 2012 | 76 | 17% | — | ||
9PaleobiologyCambridge University Press · United Kingdom | 1.61Q1 | 1.98 0.67 down from 2012 | 156 | 2% | $3,550 | ||
10AntiquityCambridge University Press · United Kingdom | 1.61Q1 | 1.12 0.10 up from 2012 | 479 | 20% | $3,550 | ||
11Vegetation History and ArchaeobotanySpringer Science+Business Media · Germany | 1.53Q1 | 2.11 0.01 down from 2012 | 146 | 15% | $3,790 | ||
12Palaeontologia ElectronicaOAUnited States | 1.48Q1 | 2.36 1.86 up from 2012 | 45 | 100% | — | ||
13PalaeontologyWiley · United Kingdom | 1.39Q1 | 2.50 0.36 up from 2012 | 237 | 62% | $5,000 | ||
14Journal of AnatomyWiley · United Kingdom | 1.33Q1 | 2.59 0.16 down from 2012 | 402 | 91% | $4,050 | ||
15PalaiosSociety for Sedimentary Geology · United States | 1.32Q1 | 1.92 0.14 down from 2012 | 246 | 16% | — | ||
16LethaiaOAWiley · Norway | 1.26Q1 | 2.04 0.37 down from 2012 | 126 | 19% | $3,300 | ||
17Journal of Iberian GeologySpringer International Publishing · Spain | 1.24Q1 | 1.81 0.49 up from 2012 | 45 | 100% | $3,190 | ||
18Cretaceous ResearchElsevier BV · United Kingdom | 1.24Q1 | 2.27 0.38 up from 2012 | 263 | 18% | $3,560 | ||
19Latin American AntiquityCambridge University Press · United States | 1.20Q2 | 0.99 0.14 up from 2012 | 102 | 19% | $3,550 | ||
20Journal of Vertebrate PaleontologyTaylor & Francis · United States | 1.19Q2 | 2.22 0.31 up from 2012 | 445 | 15% | — | ||
21Journal of Mammalian EvolutionSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands | 1.19Q2 | 1.79 0.38 down from 2012 | 90 | 38% | $3,790 | ||
22American AntiquityCambridge University Press · United States | 1.17Q2 | 1.29 0.62 down from 2012 | 158 | 7% | $3,550 | ||
23Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of EdinburghCambridge University Press · United Kingdom | 1.06Q2 | 0.74 1.09 down from 2012 | 95 | 25% | $3,550 | ||
24Comptes Rendus PalevolOAMuséum national d'histoire naturelle · France | 1.06Q2 | 1.28 0.14 up from 2012 | 185 | 32% | — | ||
25The Paleontological Society PapersCambridge University Press · United States | 1.05Q2 | 0.76 0.72 down from 2012 | 40 | 18% | — | ||
26Revue de MicropaléontologieElsevier BV · France | 1.03Q2 | 2.22 0.22 up from 2012 | 33 | 0% | $2,470 | ||
27Acta Palaeontologica PolonicaOAInstitute of Paleobiology · Poland | 1.01Q2 | 1.69 0.08 up from 2012 | 303 | 100% | $23 | ||
28Bulletin of GeosciencesOACzechia | 0.98Q2 | 1.78 0.43 up from 2012 | 154 | 93% | — | ||
29Journal of MorphologyWiley · United States | 0.93Q2 | 1.79 0.11 up from 2012 | 328 | 15% | $4,220 | ||
30Palaeobiodiversity and PalaeoenvironmentsSpringer Nature · Germany | 0.92Q2 | 1.62 0.49 up from 2012 | 94 | 35% | $3,190 | ||
31Environmental ArchaeologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom | 0.90Q2 | 1.14 0.45 down from 2012 | 42 | 21% | — | ||
32FaciesSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany | 0.85Q2 | 1.26 0.20 down from 2012 | 142 | 12% | $2,490 | ||
33GeobiosElsevier BV · France | 0.83Q2 | 1.35 0.16 up from 2012 | 147 | 16% | $3,030 | ||
34Paläontologische ZeitschriftSpringer Nature · Germany | 0.82Q2 | 1.29 0.24 up from 2012 | 108 | 17% | $3,190 | ||
35Geologica BelgicaOAUniversity of Liège · Belgium | 0.81Q2 | 0.59 1.08 down from 2012 | 32 | 100% | — | ||
36Historical BiologyTaylor & Francis · Switzerland | 0.80Q3 | 1.40 0.34 up from 2012 | 130 | 17% | — | ||
37StratigraphyUnited States | 0.78Q3 | 0.36 1.04 down from 2012 | 61 | 19% | — | ||
38The Anatomical RecordWiley · United States | 0.77Q3 | 1.77 0.15 up from 2012 | 677 | 51% | $4,430 | ||
39European Journal of ArchaeologyCambridge University Press · United Kingdom | 0.73Q3 | 0.70 0.20 up from 2012 | 76 | 17% | $3,550 | ||
40Swiss Journal of PalaeontologyOASpringer Nature · Switzerland | 0.70Q3 | 1.52 0.39 up from 2012 | 45 | 79% | $1,340 | ||
41Alcheringa An Australasian Journal of PalaeontologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom | 0.69Q3 | 1.04 0.33 down from 2012 | 124 | 31% | — | ||
42Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological SocietyGeological Society of London · United Kingdom | 0.67Q3 | 1.00 0.26 up from 2012 | 43 | 0% | — | ||
43RadiocarbonCambridge University Press · United States | 0.67Q3 | 1.08 0.57 down from 2012 | 354 | 53% | $2,487 | ||
44Netherlands Journal of Geosciences – Geologie en MijnbouwCambridge University Press · United Kingdom | 0.66Q3 | 1.00 0.50 up from 2012 | 94 | 100% | $1,725 | ||
45GeodiversitasOAMuséum national d'histoire naturelle · France | 0.63Q3 | 0.98 0.06 down from 2012 | 102 | 84% | — | ||
46Journal of PaleontologyCambridge University Press · United States | 0.63Q3 | 1.15 0.16 up from 2012 | 350 | 6% | $3,550 | ||
47Proceedings of the Geologists AssociationElsevier BV · United Kingdom | 0.63Q3 | 1.61 0.05 down from 2012 | 205 | 9% | $3,300 | ||
48Norwegian Archaeological ReviewRoutledge · Norway | 0.62Q3 | 0.50 0.21 down from 2012 | 66 | 7% | — | ||
49Southeastern ArchaeologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom | 0.60Q3 | 0.45 0.12 up from 2012 | 107 | 3% | — | ||
50Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie - AbhandlungenE. Schweizerbart · Germany | 0.59Q3 | 0.82 0.24 down from 2012 | 274 | 5% | — |
Subfields of Earth and Planetary Sciences, with Paleontology highlighted.
- Geophysics135
- Atmospheric Science82
- Paleontology69
- Oceanography54
- Earth-Surface Processes16
- Geology14
- Geochemistry and Petrology7
- Space and Planetary Science2
Journals
Citations made in 2013. Corpus-wide, 76.9% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.
23 additional Paleontology journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2010–2012, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.
At a glance
Indicator year: 2013. Publication window: 2010–2012. How these summaries are calculated
- Ranked journals
- 69
- Window papers (baseline)
- 15,085 +16.2% from indicator year 2010
- Median OJR
- 0.81 +11.0% from indicator year 2010
- Rising journals (2025)
- 5
Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2010–2012 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.
| Measure | Year series | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranked journals | 53 | 53 | 54 | 53 | 53 | 51 | 53 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 66 | 66 | 69 | 71 | 71 | 70 | 73 | 76 | 77 | 76 | 78 | 78 | 77 | 73 | 77 | |
| Window papers (baseline) | 7,057 | 7,924 | 8,570 | 9,199 | 9,500 | 9,801 | 10,405 | 10,925 | 11,640 | 12,204 | 12,986 | 13,788 | 14,602 | 15,085 | 15,876 | 16,591 | 17,958 | 18,584 | 19,596 | 19,477 | 19,946 | 19,760 | 20,309 | 19,925 | 19,964 | 19,466 | |
| Median OJR | 0.75 | 0.61 | 0.619 | 0.63 | 0.620 | 0.708 | 0.660 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.715 | 0.7325 | 0.735 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.829 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 0.79 | 0.832 | 0.831 | 0.78 | 0.7318 | 0.68 | 0.657 | 0.64 |
How to read these rankings
- OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
- A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
- Quartiles
- Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
- Impact factor (2-year)
- Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
- Rank ranges
- Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.