OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2011

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2011

Literature and Literary Theory journal rankings 2011

41 ranked journals · Subfield in Arts and Humanities

Literature and Literary Theory has 41 ranked journals in 2011. The median OJR rose 0.05 on 2010 to 1.31, above the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 2.82. The top three are Journal of Second Language Writing, Written Communication, and ELT Journal.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2011. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2008–2010, the window the 2011 score is computed on.

41
11% of Arts and Humanities
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.31+0.05 vs 2010
This subfieldAll 0.94World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

24%
All fields: 22%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,650
Median positive listed APC: $3,650 among 11 journals. 30 have no known price. All fields: $3,470.

Subfields of Arts and Humanities (13)

41 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Literature and Literary Theory ranking, 2011

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2010. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2008–2010, the window the 2011 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2008–2010 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2002 to 2011.

Compare
1Journal of Second Language WritingElsevier BV · United States
7.52Q11.79 1.46 down from 2010620%$3,830
2Written CommunicationSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
7.02Q11.76 0.47 down from 20105211%$3,650
3ELT JournalOxford University Press · United Kingdom
4.14Q10.96 0.05 up from 20102173%$5,481
4Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationSAGE Publishing · United States
3.98Q11.17 0.03 down from 2010585%$3,650
5English for Specific PurposesElsevier BV · United States
3.76Q11.61 0.50 up from 2010977%$3,590
6Research in the Teaching of EnglishRoutledge · United States
3.40Q11.02 0.33 up from 2010737%—
3.37Q10.93 0.41 up from 20101680%$3,860
8Language Culture and CurriculumRoutledge · United Kingdom
3.18Q10.59 0.20 down from 2010654%—
9Journal of English for Academic PurposesElsevier BV · United Kingdom
2.96Q11.35 0.19 up from 201010710%$3,730
2.94Q11.16 0.43 down from 20104237%$3,190
11Technical Communication QuarterlyRoutledge · United States
2.82Q11.32 0.71 up from 2010544%—
12Language and EducationTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
2.72Q21.35 0.29 up from 20101446%—
13Journal of Literacy ResearchSAGE Publishing · United States
2.58Q21.64 0.04 down from 20104717%$3,650
14Narrative InquiryJohn Benjamins Publishing Company · Netherlands
2.21Q20.90 0.22 up from 20107110%—
15College Composition and CommunicationNational Council of Teachers of English · United States
2.15Q20.78 0.35 up from 20102022%—
16LiteracyWiley · United Kingdom
2.09Q20.49 0.46 down from 2010944%$3,470
17Children s Literature in EducationSpringer Nature · United States
1.71Q20.57 0.17 up from 20106921%$3,190
18English EducationNational Council of Teachers of English
1.64Q20.60 0.11 up from 2010825%—
19Shakespeare studiesFairleigh Dickinson University Press · United States
1.55Q20.13 0.13 up from 2010300%—
20Revista Brasileira de Lingüística AplicadaOAFederal University of Minas Gerais · Brazil
1.31Q20.18 0.04 up from 2010102100%—
21Language ArtsNational Council of Teachers of English · United States
1.31Q20.30 0.16 down from 20102186%—
22Digital humanities quarterlyOAAlliance of Digital Humanities Organizations · United States
1.20Q30.41 0.09 up from 201078100%—
23English in EducationTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.10Q30.44 0.02 up from 2010753%—
24Journal of Folklore ResearchIndiana University Press · United States
1.05Q30.29 0.03 up from 2010568%—
25English Text ConstructionJohn Benjamins Publishing Company · Netherlands
0.97Q30.44 0.35 up from 2010584%—
0.89Q30.33 0.09 down from 201076100%—
27Trabalhos em Linguística AplicadaOAUniversity of Campinas · Brazil
0.89Q30.38 0.34 up from 201086100%—
28DELTA Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e AplicadaOAPontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo · Brazil
0.82Q30.37 0.04 up from 2010129100%—
0.78Q30.50 0.11 down from 201048100%—
30International Journal of Humanities and Arts ComputingEdinburgh University Press · United Kingdom
0.71Q30.29 0.17 down from 20104722%—
31UbiquityOAAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
0.70Q30.46 0.02 up from 201010268%—
32Linguagem em (Dis)cursoOAUniversidade do Sul de Santa Catarina · Brazil
0.52Q40.14 0.06 down from 201095100%—
33Linguistics and the Human SciencesEquinox Publishing · United Kingdom
0.50Q40.29 0.21 up from 20104018%—
34ProjectionsBerghahn Books · United States
0.47Q40.11 0.28 down from 20105420%—
35HispaniaAmerican Association of Teachers of Spanish and Portuguese · United States
0.42Q40.09 0.15 down from 20102311%—
36Digital Studies / Le champ numériqueOAOpen Library of Humanities · Canada
0.30Q40.12 0.02 up from 201054100%—
0.17Q40.08no change1,1800%—
38Minnesota ReviewDuke University Press · United States
0.15Q40.07no change1244%—
39˜The œMissouri reviewUniversity of Missouri · United States
0.02Q40.02no change3430%—
40Opticon1826UCL Press · United Kingdom
0.02Q40.02 0.03 down from 20107685%—
41Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & LiteratureOAAutonomous University of Barcelona · Spain
0.00Q40.00no change31100%—

Citations made in 2011. Corpus-wide, 75.1% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

21 additional Literature and Literary Theory journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2008–2010, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2011. Publication window: 2008–2010. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
41
Window papers (baseline)
79,853 +22.8% from indicator year 2008
Median OJR
1.31 +39.2% from indicator year 2008
Rising journals (2025)
2

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2008–2010 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals2830313230313535373639414346505556596263606473737672
Window papers (baseline)39,15241,29344,36047,69350,56853,72456,80660,43765,03169,36274,88279,85384,45987,43189,17791,54394,47097,02699,068101,727103,853106,881106,516103,525100,705102,959
Median OJR0.770.911.050.991.121.0141.181.100.940.9011.261.311.491.3031.2991.3351.111.3391.351.241.511.0101.020.930.9030.89

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.