OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2011

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Field ranking · 2011

Neuroscience journal rankings 2011

276 ranked journals · Field in Life Sciences

Neuroscience has 276 ranked journals in 2011. Its median journal scores above the world average: OJR 1.14 against 1.00, down 0.01 on 2010. A journal needs OJR 1.76 to reach Q1. The top three are Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, Nature Neuroscience, and Psychological Review.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2011. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2008–2010, the window the 2011 score is computed on.

276
12% of Life Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.14-0.01 vs 2010
This fieldAll 0.94World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

15%
All fields: 22%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,801
Median positive listed APC: $3,801 among 164 journals. Another 3 list $0; 109 have no known price. All fields: $3,470.

Subfields in Neuroscience (8)

Up to Life Sciences

276 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Neuroscience ranking, 2011

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2010. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2008–2010, the window the 2011 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2008–2010 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2002 to 2011.

Compare
1Frontiers in NeuroendocrinologyElsevier BV · United States
6.09Q112.52 0.43 down from 201010442%$4,800
2Nature NeuroscienceNature Portfolio · United States
5.35Q114.60 1.90 up from 201083269%$12,690
3Psychological ReviewAmerican Psychological Association · United States
5.13Q19.04 0.27 up from 201018514%—
4NeuronCell Press · United States
4.97Q113.99 1.35 up from 20101,22499%$10,400
5Psychological ScienceSAGE Publishing · United States
4.66Q16.32 0.31 down from 201081629%$3,900
6Progress in NeurobiologyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.64Q111.18 0.05 up from 201020136%$5,190
7Current Directions in Psychological ScienceSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
4.35Q16.98 0.93 up from 201022224%$3,900
8Neuroscience & Biobehavioral ReviewsElsevier BV · United States
3.80Q19.62 0.56 up from 201038223%$4,860
9Brain Research ReviewsElsevier BV · Netherlands
3.73Q19.72 0.46 up from 201019239%—
10Cognitive PsychologyElsevier BV · United States
3.70Q15.73 0.23 down from 20107536%$3,570
11Molecular PsychiatrySpringer Nature · United Kingdom
3.67Q110.12 0.75 down from 201042666%$5,490
12Journal of Experimental Psychology GeneralAmerican Psychological Association
3.59Q15.47 1.15 down from 201011328%—
13IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental DevelopmentInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
3.46Q13.98 1.32 up from 2010658%—
14Brain Structure and FunctionSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
3.38Q17.51 1.62 up from 201013032%$4,790
15Behavior Research MethodsSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
3.26Q13.46 0.36 down from 201040999%$3,990
16NeuropsychopharmacologySpringer Nature · United States
3.21Q19.20 2.50 up from 2010688100%$5,290
17Journal of NeuroscienceSociety for Neuroscience · United States
3.19Q18.91 0.13 up from 20104,808100%—
18Neuropsychology ReviewSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
3.17Q17.81 1.78 up from 20109650%$3,890
19Biological PsychiatryElsevier BV · United States
3.14Q18.13 0.91 up from 20101,21040%$5,489
20Human Brain MappingOAWiley · United States
3.09Q16.49 0.12 down from 201063496%$3,520
21Topics in Cognitive ScienceWiley · United States
3.08Q14.48 1.63 up from 201011751%$3,470
22Frontiers in Integrative NeuroscienceOAFrontiers Media · Switzerland
3.04Q16.52 0.58 up from 201059100%$3,801
23CognitionElsevier BV · Netherlands
3.02Q14.81 0.43 up from 201046933%$3,910
24Social Cognitive and Affective NeuroscienceOAUniversity of Oxford · United Kingdom
3.00Q15.58 0.24 down from 2010207100%$2,379
25Cerebral CortexOxford University Press · United States
2.93Q16.62 0.36 down from 201083068%$5,038
26Cognitive ScienceWiley · United States
2.89Q13.25 0.55 down from 201021854%$4,000
27NeuroImageOAElsevier BV · United States
2.81Q16.56 0.42 up from 20102,90948%$3,540
28Journal of Memory and LanguageElsevier BV · United States
2.79Q13.61 2.05 down from 201018736%$4,670
29Frontiers in Neural CircuitsOAFrontiers Media · Switzerland
2.70Q16.67 1.27 up from 201052100%$3,801
30Frontiers in NeuroenergeticsOAFrontiers Media · Switzerland
2.62Q15.50 0.93 up from 201036100%$0 listed
31Journal of NeuroinflammationOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
2.60Q15.17 2.03 down from 2010194100%$4,090
32Current BiologyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
2.52Q15.63 0.22 up from 20102,38599%$7,030
33Brain stimulationOAElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.48Q13.59 0.34 down from 201012681%$4,430
34IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation EngineeringOAInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
2.37Q14.34 1.12 up from 201026028%$2,075
35NeuroMolecular MedicineSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
2.36Q15.86 0.06 up from 20101148%$4,990
36Journal of Cognitive NeuroscienceThe MIT Press · United States
2.33Q15.52 0.38 up from 201075353%—
37Mind & LanguageWiley · United Kingdom
2.28Q13.20 0.14 up from 20109230%$4,150
38Cognitive Affective & Behavioral NeuroscienceSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
2.23Q15.09 0.71 up from 201014395%$3,190
39American Journal of Speech-Language PathologyAmerican Speech–Language–Hearing Association · United States
2.23Q13.19 0.02 up from 201010518%—
40Social NeuroscienceTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
2.19Q13.51 0.37 down from 201016119%—
41Social CognitionGuilford Press · United States
2.18Q12.63 0.25 down from 20101509%—
42The NeuroscientistSAGE Publishing · United States
2.08Q15.17 0.91 up from 201015437%$4,400
43Annual Review of NeuroscienceAnnual Reviews · United States
2.08Q133.63 2.61 down from 20106144%—
44Psychiatry Research NeuroimagingElsevier BV · United Kingdom
2.07Q14.47 0.02 up from 201038143%$3,110
45Neurobiology of AgingElsevier BV · United States
2.06Q14.89no change75345%$3,430
2.04Q14.29 0.50 up from 20103,00334%$5,080
47Journal of Neural EngineeringIOP Publishing · United Kingdom
2.03Q15.86 1.81 up from 201019772%$3,325
48Annual Review of PsychologyAnnual Reviews · United States
2.03Q113.33 3.51 down from 20108039%—
49GliaWiley · United States
2.02Q15.39 0.15 up from 201051737%$5,450
50NeuropsychologiaElsevier BV · United Kingdom
2.00Q14.54 0.12 down from 20101,13336%$3,300

Citations made in 2011. Corpus-wide, 75.1% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

72 additional Neuroscience journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2008–2010, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2011. Publication window: 2008–2010. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
276
Window papers (baseline)
164,012 +24.7% from indicator year 2008
Median OJR
1.136 +11.0% from indicator year 2008
Rising journals (2025)
30Comparison-group list (30)

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2008–2010 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals196201210220223230231238242248266276290292295306314319321328332344352356360355
Window papers (baseline)92,77997,762100,667104,810108,324115,003120,244126,308131,531143,118150,842164,012167,583173,307175,900181,549185,572184,543184,806187,130193,371201,253210,793215,142216,969218,119
Median OJR0.790.840.8890.910.9240.9981.040.99961.0241.0941.1461.1361.161.1501.1411.0861.0831.0761.0221.061.010.930.9180.900.8900.86
Category context (2025)
MeasureCategory statisticEligible population
Journal self-citation shareMedian: 3.2%293 journals
Retracted papers per 1,000Pooled rate: 0.951 per 1,000257 journals
Output growthMedian: -9.4%327 journals
Open access shareMedian: 68.0%355 journals
Listed APC (USD)Median including $0 listed prices: $3,555226 ranked journals with a known listed price, including $0 listed prices
International collaboration shareMedian: 27.0%344 journals
Review shareMedian: 1.4%355 journals
Articles-only OJRMedian: 0.86349 journals
Uncited shareMedian: 27.2%355 journals
Citation concentrationMedian: 43.1%355 journals

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.