OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2025

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Field ranking · 2025

Neuroscience journal rankings 2025

355 ranked journals · Field in Life Sciences

Neuroscience has 355 ranked journals in 2025. The median journal has an OJR of 0.86, below the world average of 1.00, down 0.03 on 2024; Q1 starts at OJR 1.21. The two highest-scoring journals with stable ranks are Nature Human Behaviour and Nature Neuroscience: each is likely ranked within the top 4.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2025. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2022–2024, the window the 2025 score is computed on.

355
12% of Life Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.86-0.03 vs 2024
This fieldAll 0.78World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

30%
All fields: 38%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,570
Median positive listed APC: $3,570 among 222 journals. Another 4 list $0; 129 have no known price. All fields: $3,200.

Subfields in Neuroscience (8)

Up to Life Sciences

355 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Neuroscience ranking, 2025

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

The small range under it is the likely rank range: in 95% of 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers, it ranked inside that range. Journals whose ranges overlap are not clearly different.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2024. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2022–2024, the window the 2025 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2022–2024 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2016 to 2025.

A label compares the 2022→2025 change with the median change of the journal’s field or domain. Rising needs a relative change of +10% or more that is at least 2 standard errors above zero; Falling needs -9.1% or less (rounded), at least 2 standard errors below zero. Sorting uses that relative change.

Compare
Rank 1; likely between #1 and #2 of 355Nature Human BehaviourNature Portfolio · United Kingdom
5.22Q112.54 0.80 up from 202478646%$12,690Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 2; likely between #1 and #2 of 355Nature NeuroscienceNature Portfolio · United States
4.95Q115.28 1.12 down from 202475857%$12,690Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 3; likely between #3 and #6 of 355NeuronCell Press · United States
3.80Q112.76 0.72 up from 20241,05663%$10,400Rising vs field, 2022–25
Rank 4; likely between #3 and #8 of 355Current Directions in Psychological ScienceSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
3.51Q15.96 1.61 down from 202418570%$3,900
Rank 5; likely between #3 and #7 of 355Journal of NeuroinflammationOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
3.50Q112.03 0.92 up from 2024937100%$4,090Rising vs field, 2022–25
Rank 6; likely between #3 and #12 of 355Annual Review of PsychologyAnnual Reviews · United States
3.47Q119.41 7.55 down from 20248293%—
Rank 7; likely between #5 and #9 of 355Molecular PsychiatrySpringer Nature · United Kingdom
3.09Q110.40 0.45 down from 20241,40270%$5,490
Rank 8; likely between #5 and #19 of 355Communications PsychologyOASpringer Science+Business Media
2.78Q15.72 2.06 up from 2024173100%$2,090
Rank 9; likely between #7 and #17 of 355Nature reviews. NeuroscienceNature Portfolio · United Kingdom
2.66Q113.48 0.05 up from 202432817%—
Rank 10; likely between #4 and #43 of 355Brain InformaticsOASpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
2.65Q112.71 5.68 up from 202496100%$1,090
Rank 11; likely between #7 and #25 of 355Psychological ReviewAmerican Psychological Association · United States
2.54Q15.40 1.80 down from 202418357%—
Rank 12; likely between #9 and #21 of 355Psychological ScienceSAGE Publishing · United States
2.48Q14.87 0.75 down from 202433071%$3,900Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 13; likely between #10 and #19 of 355Translational PsychiatryOASpringer Nature · United States
2.41Q18.10 0.70 up from 20241,388100%$5,290Rising vs field, 2022–25
Rank 14; likely between #7 and #37 of 355Frontiers in NeuroendocrinologyElsevier BV · United States
2.40Q17.65 0.14 down from 202411460%$4,800
Rank 15; likely between #10 and #28 of 355Journal of Pineal ResearchWiley · Denmark
2.32Q17.85 0.90 up from 202418753%$5,000
Rank 16; likely between #8 and #45 of 355ACM Transactions on Accessible ComputingAssociation for Computing Machinery · United States
2.30Q14.50 0.97 down from 20248075%—
Rank 17; likely between #9 and #41 of 355Nature Reviews PsychologyNature Portfolio · United Kingdom
2.23Q18.78 2.09 down from 202438214%—
Rank 18; likely between #14 and #33 of 355IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation EngineeringOAInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
2.15Q17.60 0.77 up from 20241,197100%$2,075Rising vs field, 2022–25
Rank 19; likely between #9 and #51 of 355Neuroscience of ConsciousnessOAUniversity of Oxford · United Kingdom
2.13Q15.42 1.21 down from 202483100%$2,544
Rank 20; likely between #17 and #32 of 355Neuroscience & Biobehavioral ReviewsElsevier BV · United States
2.11Q18.93 0.20 down from 20241,17266%$4,860Rising vs field, 2022–25
Rank 21; likely between #11 and #43 of 355Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive ScienceWiley · United States
2.11Q14.25 0.79 down from 20248950%$4,150
Rank 22; likely between #13 and #46 of 355npj Science of LearningOANature Portfolio · United Kingdom
2.09Q15.14 1.24 up from 2024168100%$2,690
Rank 23; likely between #19 and #31 of 355Biomedical Signal Processing and ControlElsevier BV · United Kingdom
2.08Q17.56 0.54 up from 20243,49717%$2,590Rising vs field, 2022–25
Rank 24; likely between #14 and #42 of 355Molecular AutismOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
2.08Q16.28 0.15 down from 2024148100%$3,990
Rank 25; likely between #16 and #40 of 355AutismSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
2.06Q15.81 0.63 down from 202460374%$3,900Rising vs field, 2022–25
Rank 26; likely between #16 and #39 of 355Behavior Research MethodsSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
2.05Q15.53 0.78 up from 202477971%$3,990
Rank 27; likely between #15 and #45 of 355Fluids and Barriers of the CNSOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
2.02Q17.37 0.51 up from 2024297100%$3,390
Rank 28; likely between #17 and #41 of 355NeuropsychopharmacologySpringer Nature · United States
2.02Q16.21 0.47 down from 202470787%$5,290
Rank 29; likely between #16 and #44 of 355Developmental Cognitive NeuroscienceOAElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.01Q14.91 0.91 down from 2024390100%$3,650
Rank 30; likely between #12 and #52 of 355Annual Review of NeuroscienceAnnual Reviews · United States
2.01Q116.79 0.07 up from 20246496%—
Rank 31; likely between #14 and #50 of 355Annals of the New York Academy of SciencesWiley · United States
1.96Q14.68 1.17 down from 202447465%$5,080
Rank 32; likely between #16 and #49 of 355Health Information Science and SystemsSpringer Nature · United Kingdom
1.95Q15.97 1.10 up from 202415593%$2,590
Rank 33; likely between #15 and #51 of 355Autism in AdulthoodMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
1.94Q14.66 2.86 down from 202421553%—
Rank 34; likely between #16 and #50 of 355Progress in NeurobiologyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.92Q14.69 2.16 down from 202424666%$5,190
Rank 35; likely between #27 and #45 of 355Brain Behavior and ImmunityElsevier BV · United States
1.88Q17.05 0.21 up from 20241,04948%$5,680Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 36; likely between #23 and #48 of 355Biological PsychiatryElsevier BV · United States
1.88Q15.31 0.49 up from 202493120%$5,489
Rank 37; likely between #30 and #45 of 355NeuroImageOAElsevier BV · United States
1.85Q15.60 0.05 down from 20241,825100%$3,540
Rank 38; likely between #9 and #82 of 355Autism ResearchWiley · United States
1.84Q13.89 2.19 down from 202457671%$4,740
Rank 39; likely between #10 and #92 of 355Trends in Neuroscience and EducationElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.83Q14.73 0.33 up from 20246369%$3,880
Rank 40; likely between #26 and #51 of 355Trends in Cognitive SciencesElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.82Q19.56 0.24 down from 202447451%$7,030
Rank 41; likely between #9 and #107 of 355Bioelectronic MedicineOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
1.80Q18.14 2.39 up from 202477100%$2,590
Rank 42; likely between #27 and #51 of 355Journal of Experimental Psychology GeneralAmerican Psychological Association
1.79Q13.79 0.52 down from 202452945%—
Rank 43; likely between #35 and #49 of 355Current BiologyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.76Q15.07 0.23 up from 20242,73365%$7,030
Rank 44; likely between #12 and #100 of 355Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain SciencesSAGE Publishing · United States
1.75Q14.36 1.49 up from 20249432%$3,400
Rank 45; likely between #32 and #54 of 355Trends in NeurosciencesElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.74Q19.30 1.21 down from 202436854%$7,030Rising vs field, 2022–25
Rank 46; likely between #17 and #97 of 355Journal of Memory and LanguageElsevier BV · United States
1.68Q14.02 0.81 up from 202414972%$4,670
Rank 47; likely between #26 and #80 of 355Journal of Neuroimmune PharmacologySpringer Science+Business Media · United States
1.66Q16.24 2.28 up from 202411642%$4,790
Rank 48; likely between #38 and #59 of 355GliaWiley · United States
1.64Q15.74 0.08 down from 202442970%$5,450
Rank 49; likely between #32 and #81 of 355British Journal of PsychologyWiley · United Kingdom
1.60Q13.67 0.05 down from 202417972%$3,800
Rank 50; likely between #29 and #93 of 355Cognitive PsychologyElsevier BV · United States
1.58Q12.87 1.02 down from 20248161%$3,570

The endpoints below each rank show its likely range. How rank ranges are calculated

Citations made in 2025. Corpus-wide, 84.3% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

42 additional Neuroscience journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2022–2024, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2025. Publication window: 2022–2024. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
355
Window papers (baseline)
218,119 +3.5% from indicator year 2022
Median OJR
0.86 -6.2% from indicator year 2022
Rising journals (2025)
30Comparison-group list (30)

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2022–2024 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals196201210220223230231238242248266276290292295306314319321328332344352356360355
Window papers (baseline)92,77997,762100,667104,810108,324115,003120,244126,308131,531143,118150,842164,012167,583173,307175,900181,549185,572184,543184,806187,130193,371201,253210,793215,142216,969218,119
Median OJR0.790.840.8890.910.9240.9981.040.99961.0241.0941.1461.1361.161.1501.1411.0861.0831.0761.0221.061.010.930.9180.900.8900.86
Category context (2025)
MeasureCategory statisticEligible population
Journal self-citation shareMedian: 3.2%293 journals
Retracted papers per 1,000Pooled rate: 0.951 per 1,000257 journals
Output growthMedian: -9.4%327 journals
Open access shareMedian: 68.0%355 journals
Listed APC (USD)Median including $0 listed prices: $3,555226 ranked journals with a known listed price, including $0 listed prices
International collaboration shareMedian: 27.0%344 journals
Review shareMedian: 1.4%355 journals
Articles-only OJRMedian: 0.86349 journals
Uncited shareMedian: 27.2%355 journals
Citation concentrationMedian: 43.1%355 journals

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.