OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2011

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2011

Rehabilitation journal rankings 2011

20 ranked journals · Subfield in Medicine

Rehabilitation has 20 ranked journals in 2011. Its median journal scores above the world average: OJR 1.12 against 1.00, down 0.04 on 2010. A journal needs OJR 1.74 to reach Q1. The top three are Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, and Wound Repair and Regeneration.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2011. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2008–2010, the window the 2011 score is computed on.

20
<1% of Medicine
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.12-0.04 vs 2010
This subfieldAll 0.94World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

20%
All fields: 22%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,995
Median positive listed APC: $3,995 among 8 journals. 12 have no known price. All fields: $3,470.

Subfields of Medicine (42)

Show all 42 subfields

20 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Rehabilitation ranking, 2011

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2010. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2008–2010, the window the 2011 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2008–2010 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2002 to 2011.

Compare
1Journal of NeuroEngineering and RehabilitationOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
3.10Q15.79 1.26 up from 2010143100%$3,990
2Neurorehabilitation and neural repairSAGE Publishing · United States
2.89Q15.42 0.92 up from 201025043%$4,400
3Wound Repair and RegenerationWiley · United States
2.40Q13.94 0.02 up from 201028029%$3,750
1.85Q13.26 0.21 down from 20101,01821%$4,000
5Journal of Rehabilitation MedicineOAFoundation for Rehabilitation Information · Sweden
1.74Q13.27 0.43 up from 2010389100%$1,887
6Clinical RehabilitationSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
1.50Q23.24 0.19 up from 201033716%$4,400
7Topics in Stroke RehabilitationTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.28Q21.79 0.33 down from 20101527%—
8Disability and RehabilitationInforma · United Kingdom
1.21Q21.98 0.38 down from 201091113%—
9Journal of Wound CareMark Allen Group · United Kingdom
1.19Q21.99 0.05 up from 20102602%—
10NeurorehabilitationIOS Press · Netherlands
1.18Q22.07 0.29 up from 201018123%$4,150
11Neurology ReportUnited States
1.06Q31.97 0.66 up from 201013212%—
12International Journal of Rehabilitation ResearchLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United Kingdom
0.94Q31.66 0.26 down from 20101718%—
13Rehabilitation NursingLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
0.72Q31.00 0.14 up from 20101098%—
14International Journal of Therapy and RehabilitationMark Allen Group · United Kingdom
0.42Q30.60 0.01 up from 20102524%—
0.39Q30.55 0.16 up from 2010943%—
16Physical Therapy ReviewsTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.31Q41.08 0.11 up from 201012713%—
0.23Q40.39 0.03 down from 20103392%—
0.14Q40.35 0.25 up from 201052100%$434
0.03Q40.03 0.03 up from 2010470%—
20Zhongguo kangfu yixue zazhiChina-Japan Friendship Hospital · China
0.01Q40.03 0.02 up from 20104930%—

Citations made in 2011. Corpus-wide, 75.1% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

8 additional Rehabilitation journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2008–2010, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2011. Publication window: 2008–2010. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
20
Window papers (baseline)
13,052 +31.5% from indicator year 2008
Median OJR
1.12 +22.7% from indicator year 2008
Rising journals (2025)
0

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2008–2010 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1515151616171818181818202124252931293434343736353431
Window papers (baseline)4,3795,2125,6466,2576,4497,1937,8478,9789,92811,13311,98413,05214,12815,07716,12516,67317,13617,37418,08719,22220,77222,39424,33726,09227,51229,259
Median OJR0.330.380.420.470.550.830.8380.800.911.0211.151.120.921.0161.030.810.8400.780.7490.760.700.6300.7480.6330.660.65

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.