OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2011

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2011

Nephrology journal rankings 2011

41 ranked journals · Subfield in Medicine

Nephrology has 41 ranked journals in 2011. The median journal has an OJR of 0.72, below the world average of 1.00, down 0.01 on 2010; Q1 starts at OJR 1.16. The top three are Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, and Current Opinion in Nephrology & Hypertension.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2011. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2008–2010, the window the 2011 score is computed on.

41
1% of Medicine
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.72-0.01 vs 2010
This subfieldAll 0.94World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

24%
All fields: 22%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,500
Median positive listed APC: $3,500 among 23 journals. Another 1 lists $0; 17 have no known price. All fields: $3,470.

Subfields of Medicine (42)

Show all 42 subfields

41 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Nephrology ranking, 2011

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2010. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2008–2010, the window the 2011 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2008–2010 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2002 to 2011.

Compare
1Journal of the American Society of NephrologyAmerican Society of Nephrology
3.54Q19.21 0.78 up from 201093968%—
2Clinical Journal of the American Society of NephrologyLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
2.68Q15.80 0.06 down from 201098572%—
3Current Opinion in Nephrology & HypertensionLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
2.13Q15.06 0.28 down from 201026022%—
4Kidney InternationalElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.97Q15.07 0.69 up from 20101,608100%$3,500
5American Journal of Kidney DiseasesElsevier BV · United States
1.92Q14.87 0.29 up from 20101,09321%$3,900
6Seminars in NephrologyElsevier BV · United States
1.52Q13.03 0.40 down from 201018626%$3,500
7Nephrology Dialysis TransplantationOxford University Press · United Kingdom
1.44Q13.51 0.05 up from 20102,07442%$3,926
8Advances in Chronic Kidney DiseaseElsevier BV · United States
1.40Q13.03 0.41 up from 201016927%$2,900
9Seminars in DialysisWiley · United States
1.38Q12.78 0.38 up from 201034311%$3,730
10BMC NephrologyOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
1.24Q12.77 0.02 up from 201096100%$3,090
11Pediatric NephrologySpringer Science+Business Media · United States
1.16Q12.71 0.32 up from 201096426%$4,337
12Nephron Clinical PracticeKarger Publishers · Switzerland
1.07Q22.18 0.05 down from 201050146%—
13Nephron Experimental NephrologyKarger Publishers · Switzerland
1.04Q22.19 1.38 down from 201012950%—
14Journal of NephrologySpringer Science+Business Media · Italy
0.99Q22.23 0.01 up from 201016810%$4,337
0.85Q22.11 0.55 up from 201023410%$3,700
16Kidney & Blood Pressure ResearchOAKarger Publishers · Switzerland
0.79Q21.60 0.23 down from 201019937%$2,780
17Journal of Renal NutritionElsevier BV · United States
0.75Q21.96 0.41 up from 201023816%$3,490
18NephrologyWiley · Australia
0.75Q21.64 0.05 down from 201048411%$4,110
19Peritoneal Dialysis InternationalSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
0.74Q22.08 0.58 up from 201050119%$4,150
20Clinical and Experimental NephrologySpringer Science+Business Media · Japan
0.72Q21.70 0.12 up from 201034011%$3,990
21International Urology and NephrologySpringer Science+Business Media · Hungary
0.72Q21.45 0.03 down from 201055213%$3,690
22Therapeutic Apheresis and DialysisWiley · United Kingdom
0.68Q31.57 0.19 up from 201029914%$3,350
23Clinical NephrologyDustri-Verlag · Germany
0.66Q31.40 0.20 up from 20105364%—
24Renal FailureOATaylor & Francis · United States
0.61Q31.26 0.02 up from 201052599%$2,306
25Journal of Renal CareWiley · France
0.58Q31.18 0.19 up from 201013912%$3,350
26Nature Reviews NephrologyNature Portfolio · United Kingdom
0.55Q32.94 1.28 up from 201066515%—
27American Journal of NephrologyKarger Publishers · Switzerland
0.53Q33.15 2.22 up from 20101,40242%—
28Blood PurificationKarger Publishers · Switzerland
0.46Q32.21 1.50 up from 201083834%—
29Indian Journal of NephrologyOAMedknow · India
0.33Q30.67 0.29 up from 2010137100%—
30Clinical Kidney JournalOAOxford University Press · United Kingdom
0.24Q30.54 0.17 up from 201058498%$3,335
0.22Q3—no 2010 value6,643——
32Néphrologie & ThérapeutiqueElsevier BV · France
0.21Q40.59 0.02 down from 20102522%$1,780
0.18Q40.40 0.49 down from 201032100%$2,320
34Brazilian Journal of NephrologyOASociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia · Brazil
0.18Q40.43 0.39 up from 201086100%—
35NefrologíaOAElsevier BV · Spain
0.14Q40.33no change510%$0 listed
0.12Q40.30 0.14 up from 2010630%$2,000
37KidneySpringer Nature · United States
0.11Q40.23 0.16 up from 201042——
38Hong Kong Journal of NephrologyElsevier BV · Netherlands
0.11Q40.24 0.06 up from 201048100%—
39Nephrology Nursing JournalAmerican Nephrology Nurses Association · United States
0.09Q40.00 0.12 down from 2010310%—
40Dialysis & TransplantationWiley · United States
0.07Q40.16 0.02 up from 201022564%—
41Kidney Research and Clinical PracticeOAElsevier BV · South Korea
0.00Q40.00no change75100%—

Citations made in 2011. Corpus-wide, 75.1% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

12 additional Nephrology journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2008–2010, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2011. Publication window: 2008–2010. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
41
Window papers (baseline)
22,005 +47.3% from indicator year 2008
Median OJR
0.716 -1.8% from indicator year 2008
Rising journals (2025)
7

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2008–2010 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals2124262728313434333737414046514953585958586162656562
Window papers (baseline)7,1028,2338,8769,71310,06210,96812,09213,34514,93418,91020,52622,00521,12722,38823,92324,98425,88026,46527,23328,14129,15430,87132,77634,02234,44935,470
Median OJR0.580.4760.4830.620.570.600.630.670.7280.7030.7210.7160.820.7500.7300.850.810.7470.840.800.830.7330.7550.680.7040.724

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.