OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2012

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2012

Nephrology journal rankings 2012

40 ranked journals · Subfield in Medicine

Nephrology has 40 ranked journals in 2012. The median OJR rose 0.11 on 2011 to 0.82, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.20. The top three are Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, and Kidney International.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2012. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2009–2011, the window the 2012 score is computed on.

40
1% of Medicine
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.82+0.11 vs 2011
This subfieldAll 0.94World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

28%
All fields: 24%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,495
Median positive listed APC: $3,495 among 24 journals. 16 have no known price. All fields: $3,413.

Subfields of Medicine (42)

Show all 42 subfields

40 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Nephrology ranking, 2012

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2011. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2009–2011, the window the 2012 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2009–2011 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2003 to 2012.

Compare
1Journal of the American Society of NephrologyAmerican Society of Nephrology
3.54Q18.55 0.67 down from 201188272%—
2Clinical Journal of the American Society of NephrologyLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
2.67Q15.93 0.13 up from 20111,05963%—
3Kidney InternationalElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.41Q16.08 1.01 up from 20111,39498%$3,500
4Current Opinion in Nephrology & HypertensionLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
2.22Q15.24 0.18 up from 201124924%—
5American Journal of Kidney DiseasesElsevier BV · United States
1.96Q14.43 0.45 down from 20111,01124%$3,900
6Seminars in NephrologyElsevier BV · United States
1.73Q14.02 0.98 up from 201118434%$3,500
7Nephrology Dialysis TransplantationOxford University Press · United Kingdom
1.39Q13.41 0.10 down from 20112,16236%$3,926
8Advances in Chronic Kidney DiseaseElsevier BV · United States
1.30Q12.86 0.16 down from 201117832%$2,900
9American Journal of NephrologyKarger Publishers · Switzerland
1.29Q13.15no change39740%—
10BMC NephrologyOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
1.20Q12.78 0.01 up from 2011147100%$3,090
11Pediatric NephrologySpringer Science+Business Media · United States
1.17Q22.81 0.11 up from 201191326%$4,337
12Seminars in DialysisWiley · United States
1.04Q21.84 0.94 down from 20114319%$3,730
13Blood PurificationKarger Publishers · Switzerland
1.01Q22.77 0.56 up from 201133631%—
14Nephron Clinical PracticeKarger Publishers · Switzerland
0.98Q22.38 0.20 up from 20114919%—
15Journal of NephrologySpringer Science+Business Media · Italy
0.97Q22.35 0.12 up from 20112117%$4,337
16Nephron Experimental NephrologyKarger Publishers · Switzerland
0.96Q22.28 0.09 up from 201111238%—
17Cardiorenal MedicineOAKarger Publishers · Switzerland
0.93Q22.19no 2011 value3286%——
18International Journal of NephrologyOAHindawi Publishing Corporation · United Kingdom
0.88Q21.76 1.01 up from 2011139100%$1,000
19Journal of Renal NutritionElsevier BV · United States
0.85Q22.25 0.28 up from 201130723%$3,490
20NephrologyWiley · Australia
0.84Q21.93 0.29 up from 201146211%$4,110
0.81Q31.67 0.43 down from 201128015%$3,700
22Kidney & Blood Pressure ResearchOAKarger Publishers · Switzerland
0.78Q31.84 0.25 up from 201121932%$2,780
23Clinical and Experimental NephrologySpringer Science+Business Media · Japan
0.73Q31.60 0.11 down from 201139715%$3,990
24International Urology and NephrologySpringer Science+Business Media · Hungary
0.72Q31.43 0.02 down from 201157111%$3,690
25Peritoneal Dialysis InternationalSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
0.67Q31.90 0.18 down from 201142887%$4,150
26Nature Reviews NephrologyNature Portfolio · United Kingdom
0.66Q33.41 0.47 up from 201161415%—
27Therapeutic Apheresis and DialysisWiley · United Kingdom
0.66Q31.55 0.02 down from 201131115%$3,350
28Clinical NephrologyDustri-Verlag · Germany
0.63Q31.41no change5967%—
29Renal FailureOATaylor & Francis · United States
0.54Q31.28 0.02 up from 201158597%$2,306
0.53Q31.14 0.74 up from 201149100%$2,320
31Journal of Renal CareWiley · France
0.50Q41.19 0.01 up from 201114122%$3,350
32Indian Journal of NephrologyOAMedknow · India
0.45Q40.93 0.26 up from 2011182100%—
33Brazilian Journal of NephrologyOASociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia · Brazil
0.33Q40.84 0.41 up from 2011163100%—
34Néphrologie & ThérapeutiqueElsevier BV · France
0.26Q40.60 0.01 up from 20112391%$1,780
35Clinical Kidney JournalOAOxford University Press · United Kingdom
0.20Q40.34 0.21 down from 201152699%$3,335
36Dialysis & TransplantationWiley · United States
0.13Q40.25 0.08 up from 2011252——
0.12Q40.18 0.12 down from 2011620%$2,000
38Nephrology Research & ReviewsWichtig Publishing Srl · Italy
0.08Q40.20 0.04 up from 201130100%—
39Hong Kong Journal of NephrologyElsevier BV · Netherlands
0.05Q40.08 0.16 down from 201149100%—
40Kidney Research and Clinical PracticeOAElsevier BV · South Korea
0.02Q40.04 0.04 up from 201178100%—

Citations made in 2012. Corpus-wide, 75.7% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

20 additional Nephrology journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2009–2011, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2012. Publication window: 2009–2011. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
40
Window papers (baseline)
21,127 +11.7% from indicator year 2009
Median OJR
0.82 +16.9% from indicator year 2009
Rising journals (2025)
7

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2009–2011 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals2124262728313434333737414046514953585958586162656562
Window papers (baseline)7,1028,2338,8769,71310,06210,96812,09213,34514,93418,91020,52622,00521,12722,38823,92324,98425,88026,46527,23328,14129,15430,87132,77634,02234,44935,470
Median OJR0.580.4760.4830.620.570.600.630.670.7280.7030.7210.7160.820.7500.7300.850.810.7470.840.800.830.7330.7550.680.7040.724

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.