OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2014

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2014

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation journal rankings 2014

20 ranked journals · Subfield in Health Professions

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation has 20 ranked journals in 2014. The median OJR fell 0.11 on 2013 to 0.73, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.91. The top three are Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, Quest, and Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2014. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2011–2013, the window the 2014 score is computed on.

20
4% of Health Professions
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.73-0.11 vs 2013
This subfieldAll 0.90World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

15%
All fields: 27%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,620
Median positive listed APC: $3,620 among 3 journals. 17 have no known price. All fields: $3,400.

Subfields of Health Professions (11)

20 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ranking, 2014

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2013. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2011–2013, the window the 2014 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2011–2013 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2005 to 2014.

Compare
1Journal of Teaching in Physical EducationHuman Kinetics · United States
2.36Q12.16 0.73 up from 20137617%—
2QuestTaylor & Francis · United States
2.31Q12.03 0.16 up from 2013908%—
3Physical Education and Sport PedagogyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
2.05Q11.83 0.12 up from 201314522%—
4Journal of Geriatric Physical TherapyLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
1.96Q11.83 0.19 down from 20138514%—
5Sport Education and SocietyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.91Q11.58 0.51 down from 201321639%—
6Journal of Athletic TrainingOANational Athletic Trainers' Association · United States
1.85Q23.51 0.76 up from 201328193%—
7European Physical Education ReviewSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
1.78Q21.97 0.48 up from 20138118%$3,650
8Human Movement ScienceElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.33Q22.00 0.67 down from 201333518%$3,620
9Gait & PostureElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.21Q22.00 0.13 down from 20131,43018%$3,510
0.97Q20.97 0.08 up from 2013558%—
11Journal of Physical Education Recreation & DanceTaylor & Francis · United States
0.49Q30.53 0.07 up from 20132802%—
12Kinesiology ReviewHuman Kinetics · United States
0.46Q30.89 0.56 up from 2013453%—
13The Physical EducatorSagamore-Venture Publishing · United States
0.43Q30.30 0.01 down from 2013620%—
0.39Q30.39 0.07 down from 20139217%—
15Physical & Occupational Therapy In GeriatricsTaylor & Francis · United States
0.39Q30.44no change8011%—
16StrategiesTaylor & Francis · United States
0.30Q40.33 0.10 up from 20131325%—
0.29Q40.40 0.26 up from 201357——
0.29Q40.71 0.37 up from 201390100%—
19Topics in Geriatric RehabilitationLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
0.25Q40.48 0.11 up from 20131155%—
20Revue phénEPS / PHEnex JournalOAPublisher not listed
0.22Q40.24 0.13 down from 201341100%—

Citations made in 2014. Corpus-wide, 77.7% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

2 additional Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2011–2013, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2014. Publication window: 2011–2013. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
20
Window papers (baseline)
17,545 +32.3% from indicator year 2011
Median OJR
0.73 -39.7% from indicator year 2011
Rising journals (2025)
1

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2011–2013 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1212131212131414141616161919202120222222232527262523
Window papers (baseline)2,4302,8743,3953,9284,4125,2126,1527,1298,3539,94111,80613,25714,62615,82817,54519,69921,62122,54522,87123,79226,19329,91734,13337,34139,80842,647
Median OJR0.370.600.580.340.350.7400.760.690.770.901.121.220.8560.840.730.570.8640.7410.820.720.800.680.470.530.630.65

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.