OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2015

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2015

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation journal rankings 2015

21 ranked journals · Subfield in Health Professions

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation has 21 ranked journals in 2015. The median OJR fell 0.17 on 2014 to 0.57, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.63. The top three are Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, and Quest.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2015. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2012–2014, the window the 2015 score is computed on.

21
4% of Health Professions
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.57-0.17 vs 2014
This subfieldAll 0.88World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

14%
All fields: 29%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,620
Median positive listed APC: $3,620 among 3 journals. 18 have no known price. All fields: $3,390.

Subfields of Health Professions (11)

21 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ranking, 2015

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2014. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2012–2014, the window the 2015 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2012–2014 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2006 to 2015.

Compare
1Journal of Teaching in Physical EducationHuman Kinetics · United States
2.16Q12.14 0.02 down from 20147111%—
2Physical Education and Sport PedagogyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
2.12Q11.79 0.04 down from 201413241%—
3QuestTaylor & Francis · United States
1.93Q11.75 0.28 down from 20149315%—
4Journal of Athletic TrainingOANational Athletic Trainers' Association · United States
1.86Q13.44 0.07 down from 201431597%—
5European Physical Education ReviewSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
1.80Q12.05 0.08 up from 20149720%$3,650
6Sport Education and SocietyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.63Q11.49 0.10 down from 201416958%—
7Journal of Geriatric Physical TherapyLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
1.60Q21.73 0.10 down from 20147025%—
1.47Q21.22 0.25 up from 2014554%—
9Human Movement ScienceElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.25Q22.18 0.17 up from 201435323%$3,620
10Gait & PostureElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.10Q21.80 0.19 down from 20141,55115%$3,510
11Journal of Physical Education Recreation & DanceTaylor & Francis · United States
0.57Q20.72 0.19 up from 20142712%—
12Kinesiology ReviewHuman Kinetics · United States
0.54Q31.09 0.20 up from 2014756%—
13The Physical EducatorSagamore-Venture Publishing · United States
0.53Q30.38 0.09 up from 20148439%—
14Physical & Occupational Therapy In GeriatricsTaylor & Francis · United States
0.50Q30.64 0.20 up from 2014910%—
15Revue phénEPS / PHEnex JournalOAPublisher not listed
0.41Q30.55 0.31 up from 201433100%—
0.39Q30.79 0.08 up from 201493100%—
0.32Q40.94 0.55 up from 2014867%—
18StrategiesTaylor & Francis · United States
0.30Q40.32 0.01 down from 20141294%—
19Topics in Geriatric RehabilitationLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
0.28Q40.27 0.21 down from 20141189%—
0.24Q4—no 2014 value30——
0.05Q40.06 0.06 down from 201465——

Citations made in 2015. Corpus-wide, 78.1% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

3 additional Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2012–2014, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2015. Publication window: 2012–2014. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
21
Window papers (baseline)
19,699 +34.7% from indicator year 2012
Median OJR
0.57 -34.0% from indicator year 2012
Rising journals (2025)
1

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2012–2014 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1212131212131414141616161919202120222222232527262523
Window papers (baseline)2,4302,8743,3953,9284,4125,2126,1527,1298,3539,94111,80613,25714,62615,82817,54519,69921,62122,54522,87123,79226,19329,91734,13337,34139,80842,647
Median OJR0.370.600.580.340.350.7400.760.690.770.901.121.220.8560.840.730.570.8640.7410.820.720.800.680.470.530.630.65

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.