OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2015

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2015

Waste Management and Disposal journal rankings 2015

17 ranked journals · Subfield in Environmental Science

Waste Management and Disposal has 17 ranked journals in 2015. The median OJR rose 0.11 on 2014 to 0.49, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 0.87. The top three are Resources Conservation and Recycling, Waste Management, and Waste Management & Research The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2015. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2012–2014, the window the 2015 score is computed on.

17
2% of Environmental Science
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.49+0.11 vs 2014
This subfieldAll 0.88World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

24%
All fields: 29%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$4,400
Median positive listed APC: $4,400 among 5 journals. 12 have no known price. All fields: $3,390.

Subfields of Environmental Science (11)

17 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Waste Management and Disposal ranking, 2015

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2014. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2012–2014, the window the 2015 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2012–2014 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2006 to 2015.

Compare
1Resources Conservation and RecyclingElsevier BV · Netherlands
3.86Q14.66 0.77 up from 201446323%$5,270
2Waste ManagementElsevier BV · United Kingdom
3.55Q14.45 0.51 up from 201495718%$4,450
1.71Q11.86 0.03 down from 201441117%$4,400
4Journal of Material Cycles and Waste ManagementSpringer Science+Business Media · Japan
0.90Q11.44 0.45 up from 20143047%$3,190
5International Journal of Waste ResourcesOMICS Publishing Group · Indonesia
0.87Q11.19 0.79 up from 20147855%—
6Journal of Waste ManagementHindawi Publishing Corporation · Egypt
0.80Q20.89 0.63 up from 201438100%—
7Journal of Hazardous Toxic and Radioactive WasteAmerican Society of Civil Engineers · United States
0.56Q20.81 0.26 up from 20141372%—
8American Journal of Environmental ProtectionOAScience Publishing Group · United States
0.49Q20.69 0.10 up from 2014118100%—
0.49Q20.79 0.19 down from 201418279%—
10Environmental Engineering and Management JournalOAPolytechnic Institute of Iasi · Romania
0.37Q30.58 0.14 down from 2014940100%—
11International Journal of Environment and Waste ManagementInderscience Publishers · United Kingdom
0.23Q30.36 0.08 up from 20141619%—
0.23Q30.29 0.13 up from 2014945%—
13Journal of Ecological EngineeringOAPolish Society of Ecological Engineering · Poland
0.18Q30.28 0.01 down from 2014235100%$330
14Electronics Goes GreenPublisher not listed
0.17Q4—no 2014 value228——
15Kemija u industrijiOACroatian Society of Chemical Engineers · Croatia
0.06Q40.10 0.10 up from 201431100%—
16Proceedings of the Water Environment FederationWater Environment Federation · United States
0.04Q40.06 0.02 up from 20142,7221%—
17Additives for PolymersElsevier BV · United States
0.02Q40.02no change5200%—

Citations made in 2015. Corpus-wide, 78.1% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

13 additional Waste Management and Disposal journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2012–2014, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2015. Publication window: 2012–2014. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
17
Window papers (baseline)
27,325 +10.6% from indicator year 2012
Median OJR
0.49 +22.6% from indicator year 2012
Rising journals (2025)
0

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2012–2014 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals68101313131212121313141616171719202021212221212524
Window papers (baseline)8,8669,95611,25712,25413,25714,49615,88417,73019,39720,95022,09423,32124,69625,81226,99127,32526,62125,57625,28626,65228,25530,41432,32534,28536,84141,084
Median OJR0.2460.170.2540.120.0990.1020.160.110.330.560.500.401740.401660.350.380.490.360.2490.220.2850.260.2810.430.460.5770.575

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.