OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2016

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2016

Waste Management and Disposal journal rankings 2016

19 ranked journals · Subfield in Environmental Science

Waste Management and Disposal has 19 ranked journals in 2016. The median OJR fell 0.13 on 2015 to 0.36, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 0.78. The top three are Resources Conservation and Recycling, Waste Management, and Waste Management & Research The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2016. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2013–2015, the window the 2016 score is computed on.

19
2% of Environmental Science
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.36-0.13 vs 2015
This subfieldAll 0.86World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

21%
All fields: 30%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$4,400
Median positive listed APC: $4,400 among 5 journals. 14 have no known price. All fields: $3,390.

Subfields of Environmental Science (11)

19 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Waste Management and Disposal ranking, 2016

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2015. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2013–2015, the window the 2016 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2013–2015 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2007 to 2016.

Compare
1Resources Conservation and RecyclingElsevier BV · Netherlands
3.67Q14.78 0.12 up from 201553722%$5,270
2Waste ManagementElsevier BV · United Kingdom
3.21Q14.36 0.09 down from 20151,20223%$4,450
1.52Q12.14 0.27 up from 201541915%$4,400
4Journal of Material Cycles and Waste ManagementSpringer Science+Business Media · Japan
0.97Q11.25 0.18 down from 20153476%$3,190
5Journal of Waste ManagementHindawi Publishing Corporation · Egypt
0.78Q11.08 0.19 up from 20154067%—
6Journal of Hazardous Toxic and Radioactive WasteAmerican Society of Civil Engineers · United States
0.66Q20.93 0.12 up from 20151350%—
7American Journal of Environmental ProtectionOAScience Publishing Group · United States
0.43Q20.42 0.28 down from 2015219100%—
0.41Q20.59 0.20 down from 201519388%—
9International Journal of Waste ResourcesOMICS Publishing Group · Indonesia
0.37Q20.41 0.78 down from 201511547%—
10Environmental Engineering and Management JournalOAPolytechnic Institute of Iasi · Romania
0.36Q20.53 0.05 down from 2015979100%—
11International Journal of Environment and Waste ManagementInderscience Publishers · United Kingdom
0.27Q30.38 0.02 up from 20151545%—
12Journal of Ecological EngineeringOAPolish Society of Ecological Engineering · Poland
0.27Q30.49 0.22 up from 2015391100%$330
13Journal of Residuals Science and TechnologyDestech Publications · United States
0.27Q30.72 0.35 up from 2015750%—
0.23Q30.38 0.12 up from 2015370%—
0.23Q30.23 0.06 down from 20151029%—
16Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering - ADavid Publishing Company · United States
0.07Q40.09no 2015 value7699%——
17Proceedings of the Water Environment FederationWater Environment Federation · United States
0.03Q40.04 0.02 down from 20152,5630%—
18Additives for PolymersElsevier BV · United States
0.03Q40.04 0.01 up from 20155150%—
19Kemija u industrijiOACroatian Society of Chemical Engineers · Croatia
0.02Q40.09 0.01 down from 201570100%—

Citations made in 2016. Corpus-wide, 77.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

10 additional Waste Management and Disposal journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2013–2015, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2016. Publication window: 2013–2015. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
19
Window papers (baseline)
26,621 +3.1% from indicator year 2013
Median OJR
0.36 +2.2% from indicator year 2013
Rising journals (2025)
0

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2013–2015 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals68101313131212121313141616171719202021212221212524
Window papers (baseline)8,8669,95611,25712,25413,25714,49615,88417,73019,39720,95022,09423,32124,69625,81226,99127,32526,62125,57625,28626,65228,25530,41432,32534,28536,84141,084
Median OJR0.2460.170.2540.120.0990.1020.160.110.330.560.500.401740.401660.350.380.490.360.2490.220.2850.260.2810.430.460.5770.575

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.