OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2016

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2016

Environmental Engineering journal rankings 2016

42 ranked journals · Subfield in Environmental Science

Environmental Engineering has 42 ranked journals in 2016. The median OJR rose 0.11 on 2015 to 1.26, above the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 2.19. The top three are Remote Sensing of Environment, Economic Systems Research, and Journal of Cleaner Production.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2016. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2013–2015, the window the 2016 score is computed on.

42
5% of Environmental Science
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.26+0.11 vs 2015
This subfieldAll 0.86World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

26%
All fields: 30%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,690
Median positive listed APC: $3,690 among 25 journals. 17 have no known price. All fields: $3,390.

Subfields of Environmental Science (11)

42 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Environmental Engineering ranking, 2016

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2015. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2013–2015, the window the 2016 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2013–2015 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2007 to 2016.

Compare
1Remote Sensing of EnvironmentElsevier BV · United States
4.34Q17.69 0.54 up from 20151,12345%$4,450
2Economic Systems ResearchTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
4.16Q13.36 2.43 down from 20157724%—
3Journal of Cleaner ProductionElsevier BV · Netherlands
3.46Q15.87 0.19 up from 20153,30024%$4,660
2.99Q14.62 0.32 up from 201548740%$3,550
5Applied GeomaticsSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
2.62Q11.41 0.51 down from 20156743%$3,290
6Journal of Industrial EcologyWiley · United States
2.37Q13.77 0.40 up from 201535340%$3,750
2.29Q14.39 0.18 down from 201593439%$4,100
8Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote SensingAmerican Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · United States
2.24Q13.34 1.73 up from 201526777%—
9Urban ClimateElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.23Q13.80 0.64 up from 201519317%$3,690
10Advances in Water ResourcesElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.21Q13.50 0.25 down from 201552540%$3,840
11The International Journal of Life Cycle AssessmentSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
2.19Q14.14 0.26 up from 201545436%$3,990
12Sustainable Cities and SocietyElsevier BV · Netherlands
2.16Q23.34 0.35 up from 201526230%$4,870
1.95Q22.61 0.17 up from 201551012%$3,880
1.86Q23.33 0.65 up from 201574100%$900
15Earth Science InformaticsSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.52Q22.24 0.61 up from 201513328%$3,890
1.47Q21.65 0.30 up from 2015609100%—
17Canadian Journal of Remote SensingOATaylor & Francis · Canada
1.47Q22.33 0.04 up from 201514810%—
18Urban Water JournalTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.45Q21.73 0.23 down from 201523340%—
19Journal of Contaminant HydrologyElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.33Q22.20 0.09 down from 201532727%$3,640
20European Journal of Remote SensingOATaylor & Francis · Italy
1.29Q22.24 0.32 up from 2015145100%$1,060
21Hydrogeology JournalSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.28Q22.20 0.42 up from 201538827%$2,390
22Boundary-Layer MeteorologySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.24Q32.57 0.26 down from 201530734%$3,790
23Geo-spatial Information ScienceOATaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.24Q31.53 0.21 up from 201569100%$1,993
24Environmental Earth SciencesSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.10Q31.83 0.05 up from 20152,58013%$2,290
1.10Q31.86 0.31 up from 201520623%$3,570
26Ground WaterWiley · United States
1.08Q31.55 0.04 down from 201541718%$4,100
27Journal of Spatial ScienceTaylor & Francis · Australia
1.05Q30.70 0.40 down from 20158635%—
1.00Q31.11 0.27 up from 201513511%—
29Aquatic ProcediaElsevier BV · Netherlands
0.89Q31.10 0.13 down from 2015274100%—
30Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental StatisticsSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
0.77Q31.03 0.23 down from 201510822%$3,090
31Groundwater Monitoring & RemediationWiley · United States
0.76Q31.13 0.35 up from 201512711%$3,920
32Geomicrobiology JournalTaylor & Francis · United States
0.72Q31.23 0.23 down from 201532215%—
33Advances in geosciencesOACopernicus Publications · Germany
0.65Q41.04 0.16 down from 201591100%$301
34Wind and StructuresSouth Korea
0.47Q40.97 0.09 down from 20152221%—
35International Journal of VentilationTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.45Q40.62 0.41 down from 20159420%—
36Research Journal of Applied Sciences Engineering and TechnologyOAMaxwell Scientific Publications · United Kingdom
0.23Q40.27 0.01 down from 20153,143100%—
0.21Q40.21 0.01 up from 20151202%—
38GrundwasserSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.20Q40.38 0.01 up from 20159430%$2,290
0.17Q40.43 0.09 down from 201555100%—
40International Journal of Environment and Sustainable DevelopmentInderscience Publishers · United Kingdom
0.14Q40.15 0.06 up from 20153319%—
41LCM 2013Publisher not listed
0.11Q4—no 2015 value126——
0.06Q40.12 0.10 up from 201512695%—

Citations made in 2016. Corpus-wide, 77.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

13 additional Environmental Engineering journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2013–2015, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2016. Publication window: 2013–2015. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
42
Window papers (baseline)
43,684 +30.9% from indicator year 2013
Median OJR
1.263 +2.4% from indicator year 2013
Rising journals (2025)
6

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2013–2015 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals2424242626283030323437364041444242444746434750495354
Window papers (baseline)10,64211,65111,96712,70313,57614,75116,06517,17718,81220,71823,24726,01129,63933,36637,77141,49943,68445,59947,21250,08753,14456,96461,18364,95169,04473,778
Median OJR1.040.930.991.171.0581.411.1561.191.2271.0571.0561.1471.2641.2341.1171.1571.2631.201.1541.101.081.1181.181.1191.071.11

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.