OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2016

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2016

Inorganic Chemistry journal rankings 2016

20 ranked journals · Subfield in Chemistry

Inorganic Chemistry has 20 ranked journals in 2016. The median OJR rose 0.06 on 2015 to 0.41, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 0.64. The top three are Acta Crystallographica Section C Structural Chemistry, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, and Comments on Inorganic Chemistry.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2016. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2013–2015, the window the 2016 score is computed on.

20
9% of Chemistry
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.41+0.06 vs 2015
This subfieldAll 0.86World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

25%
All fields: 30%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,760
Median positive listed APC: $3,760 among 13 journals. 7 have no known price. All fields: $3,390.

Subfields of Chemistry (6)

20 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Inorganic Chemistry ranking, 2016

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2015. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2013–2015, the window the 2016 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2013–2015 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2007 to 2016.

Compare
1.77Q14.93 0.23 down from 201544817%$3,950
2Microporous and Mesoporous MaterialsElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.26Q13.22 0.12 up from 20151,72817%$3,970
3Comments on Inorganic ChemistryTaylor & Francis · United States
1.02Q12.62 1.62 up from 20153425%—
4Solvent Extraction and Ion ExchangeTaylor & Francis · United States
0.92Q12.38 0.33 up from 20151439%—
5Journal of Porous MaterialsSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.64Q11.68 0.16 up from 20154325%$3,790
6PolyhedronElsevier BV · United Kingdom
0.62Q21.96 0.06 up from 20151,91020%$3,740
7Radiochimica ActaR. Oldenbourg Verlag · Germany
0.51Q21.16 0.02 down from 20153297%$2,712
8Transition Metal ChemistrySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.48Q21.61 0.07 up from 20153149%$3,990
9Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear ChemistrySpringer Science+Business Media · Hungary
0.47Q21.10 0.05 up from 20152,19116%$3,790
0.42Q21.18 0.04 down from 20151,26114%$3,960
11Annual Reports Section A (Inorganic Chemistry)Royal Society of Chemistry · United Kingdom
0.40Q3—no 2015 value33——
12RadiochemistryPleiades Publishing · United States
0.24Q30.73 0.10 up from 20153100%—
0.23Q3—no 2015 value325—$3,760
14Zeitschrift für Naturforschung BDe Gruyter · Germany
0.22Q30.48 0.14 down from 201556415%$2,712
0.19Q30.53 0.11 up from 20159624%—
16Progress in Reaction Kinetics and MechanismOASAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
0.16Q40.58 0.16 up from 201510212%—
17Acta Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic CommunicationsOAInternational Union of Crystallography · United Kingdom
0.08Q40.29 0.18 down from 20151,194100%$500
18Acta Crystallographica Section E Structure Reports OnlineOAInternational Union of Crystallography
0.07Q40.23no change3,125—$500
0.01Q40.13 0.08 up from 2015663100%$848
0.01Q40.02no change97100%—

Citations made in 2016. Corpus-wide, 77.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

2 additional Inorganic Chemistry journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2013–2015, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2016. Publication window: 2013–2015. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
20
Window papers (baseline)
42,234 -0.6% from indicator year 2013
Median OJR
0.412 +38.0% from indicator year 2013
Rising journals (2025)
1

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2013–2015 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1314151615141515161617181919181920191817161717161517
Window papers (baseline)20,36321,36322,27723,28924,80926,77428,99031,27033,57435,02036,83438,49041,16842,50042,89942,64042,23441,91040,65240,01240,31341,63742,58642,11641,87743,000
Median OJR0.490.3940.3990.500.450.460.420.4110.430.3900.3890.4020.2810.29860.2680.3550.4120.380.2830.25510.2700.25520.2710.29850.330.349

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.