OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2017

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2017

Inorganic Chemistry journal rankings 2017

19 ranked journals · Subfield in Chemistry

Inorganic Chemistry has 19 ranked journals in 2017. The median journal has an OJR of 0.38, below the world average of 1.00, down 0.03 on 2016; Q1 starts at OJR 0.63. The top three are Acta Crystallographica Section C Structural Chemistry, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, and Comments on Inorganic Chemistry.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2017. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2014–2016, the window the 2017 score is computed on.

19
8% of Chemistry
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.38-0.03 vs 2016
This subfieldAll 0.84World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

32%
All fields: 32%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,740
Median positive listed APC: $3,740 among 13 journals. 6 have no known price. All fields: $3,350.

Subfields of Chemistry (6)

19 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Inorganic Chemistry ranking, 2017

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2016. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2014–2016, the window the 2017 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2014–2016 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2008 to 2017.

Compare
1.93Q10.67 4.26 down from 201658816%$3,950
2Microporous and Mesoporous MaterialsElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.28Q13.74 0.52 up from 20161,80715%$3,970
3Comments on Inorganic ChemistryTaylor & Francis · United States
0.96Q12.91 0.29 up from 20164920%—
4Solvent Extraction and Ion ExchangeTaylor & Francis · United States
0.88Q12.18 0.21 down from 201612427%—
5PolyhedronElsevier BV · United Kingdom
0.63Q12.16 0.20 up from 20161,90915%$3,740
6Journal of Porous MaterialsSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.61Q21.52 0.16 down from 20165934%$3,790
7Radiochimica ActaR. Oldenbourg Verlag · Germany
0.50Q21.19 0.03 up from 20163367%$2,712
8Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear ChemistrySpringer Science+Business Media · Hungary
0.48Q21.21 0.12 up from 20162,15313%$3,790
0.39Q21.14 0.04 down from 20161,05936%$3,960
10Transition Metal ChemistrySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.38Q21.12 0.48 down from 20162998%$3,990
11RadiochemistryPleiades Publishing · United States
0.23Q30.68 0.06 down from 20162940%—
12Zeitschrift für Naturforschung BDe Gruyter · Germany
0.23Q30.68 0.20 up from 20165676%$2,712
13Progress in Reaction Kinetics and MechanismOASAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
0.21Q30.60 0.02 up from 20161152%—
0.20Q30.60 0.08 up from 2016649——
15Acta Crystallographica Section E Structure Reports OnlineOAInternational Union of Crystallography
0.07Q3—no 2016 value1,237—$500
16Acta Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic CommunicationsOAInternational Union of Crystallography · United Kingdom
0.06Q40.30 0.01 up from 20161,632100%$500
0.04Q40.07 0.05 up from 201689100%—
18IUCrDataOAInternational Union of Crystallography · United Kingdom
0.04Q40.21 0.19 down from 2016517100%$300
0.02Q40.25 0.12 up from 2016868100%$848

Citations made in 2017. Corpus-wide, 77.7% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

1 additional Inorganic Chemistry journal with metrics is unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2014–2016, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2017. Publication window: 2014–2016. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
19
Window papers (baseline)
41,910 -2.3% from indicator year 2014
Median OJR
0.38 +41.5% from indicator year 2014
Rising journals (2025)
1

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2014–2016 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1314151615141515161617181919181920191817161717161517
Window papers (baseline)20,36321,36322,27723,28924,80926,77428,99031,27033,57435,02036,83438,49041,16842,50042,89942,64042,23441,91040,65240,01240,31341,63742,58642,11641,87743,000
Median OJR0.490.3940.3990.500.450.460.420.4110.430.3900.3890.4020.2810.29860.2680.3550.4120.380.2830.25510.2700.25520.2710.29850.330.349

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.