OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2016

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Field ranking · 2016

Psychology journal rankings 2016

953 ranked journals · Field in Social Sciences

Psychology has 953 ranked journals in 2016. The median journal has an OJR of 1.00, level with the world average of 1.00, down 0.01 on 2015; Q1 starts at OJR 1.73. The top three are Therapeutic Recreation Journal, Perspectives on Psychological Science, and Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2016. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2013–2015, the window the 2016 score is computed on.

953
16% of Social Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.00-0.01 vs 2015
This fieldAll 0.86World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

20%
All fields: 30%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,510
Median positive listed APC: $3,510 among 409 journals. Another 8 list $0; 536 have no known price. All fields: $3,390.

Subfields in Psychology (7)

Up to Social Sciences

953 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Psychology ranking, 2016

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2015. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2013–2015, the window the 2016 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2013–2015 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2007 to 2016.

Compare
18.86Q132.87 6.46 down from 20157312%—
2Perspectives on Psychological ScienceSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
7.15Q110.37 0.65 down from 201520434%$3,900
3Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyAmerican Psychological Association · United States
6.76Q18.34 2.03 up from 201536825%—
4Psychological BulletinAmerican Psychological Association · United States
6.65Q118.87 4.62 up from 201515437%—
5JAMA PsychiatryAmerican Medical Association · United States
5.81Q110.40 0.03 down from 201567450%—
6Child Development PerspectivesWiley · United Kingdom
5.58Q15.86 1.00 up from 201513238%$3,700
7Psychological MethodsAmerican Psychological Association · United States
5.52Q15.85 0.82 down from 201510440%—
8Journal of Behavioral AddictionsOAAkadémiai Kiadó · Hungary
5.47Q16.17 0.88 up from 201599100%$916
9Reading Research QuarterlyWiley · United States
5.45Q14.23 0.62 up from 20157747%$3,530
10Developmental ReviewElsevier BV · United States
5.26Q17.25 0.34 up from 20156839%$4,330
11Journal of the Learning SciencesRoutledge · United States
5.19Q13.20 1.59 down from 20155641%—
12Language LearningWiley · United States
5.15Q13.42 1.44 down from 201515233%$3,760
13Sign Language & LinguisticsJohn Benjamins Publishing Company · Netherlands
5.01Q12.10 0.19 down from 2015457%—
14ReCALLCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
4.98Q12.75 0.42 down from 20158544%$3,550
15Child DevelopmentWiley · United Kingdom
4.89Q15.37 0.38 up from 201541150%$4,320
16Journal of Computer Assisted LearningWiley · United Kingdom
4.80Q13.10 0.33 down from 201512219%$4,150
17European PsychologistHogrefe Verlag · Germany
4.54Q13.06 0.88 down from 201511014%—
18American PsychologistAmerican Psychological Association · United States
4.47Q14.23 0.65 up from 201541015%—
19Clinical Psychological ScienceSAGE Publishing · United States
4.37Q15.74 1.71 down from 201520572%$3,900
20Journal of Counseling PsychologyAmerican Psychological Association · United States
4.30Q14.10 0.48 down from 201520012%—
21World PsychiatryWiley · Italy
4.26Q17.97 1.40 up from 201526798%—
22European Journal of PersonalitySAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
4.24Q15.25 0.14 down from 201512536%$3,900
23American Journal of PsychiatryAmerican Psychiatric Association · United States
4.09Q17.08 1.15 down from 201572972%—
24IEEE Transactions on Affective ComputingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
3.97Q15.73 0.14 down from 201514026%$2,645
25Journal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologyAmerican Psychological Association · United States
3.89Q16.43 0.03 down from 201530760%—
26Contemporary Educational PsychologyElsevier BV · Netherlands
3.87Q15.18 1.44 up from 201511438%$4,720
3.86Q16.87no change37260%$4,530
28Developmental PsychologyAmerican Psychological Association · United States
3.83Q14.15 0.01 down from 201549148%—
29School Psychology QuarterlyAmerican Psychological Association · United States
3.81Q13.63 0.06 up from 201512435%—
30Journal of Abnormal PsychologyAmerican Psychological Association · United States
3.68Q15.65 1.08 down from 201526349%—
3.66Q17.42 0.11 up from 20151,16796%—
32Scientific Studies of ReadingTaylor & Francis · United States
3.63Q13.16 1.16 down from 20156949%—
3.46Q12.60 2.75 down from 201561100%—
34Behaviour Research and TherapyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
3.46Q15.54 0.20 down from 201539049%$3,580
35Human DevelopmentKarger Publishers · Switzerland
3.44Q14.67 2.94 up from 201511950%—
36Journal of Aging StudiesElsevier BV · United Kingdom
3.42Q12.55 0.37 down from 201515920%$3,340
37Evolution and Human BehaviorElsevier BV · United States
3.38Q14.26 0.19 down from 201521831%$4,330
38Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent PsychologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
3.35Q14.18 0.60 down from 201529165%—
39Journal of Adolescent HealthElsevier BV · United States
3.34Q15.01 0.09 up from 201581738%$3,670
40International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative LearningSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
3.33Q14.41 0.52 up from 20156055%$3,290
41Language Assessment QuarterlyTaylor & Francis · United States
3.30Q11.83 0.34 down from 20156617%—
42Clinical Psychology ReviewElsevier BV · United States
3.28Q113.13 0.28 up from 201520658%$5,270
43Educational Psychology ReviewSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
3.24Q15.22 1.58 up from 201512919%$4,790
44Sleep HealthElsevier BV · Netherlands
3.23Q14.29no 2015 value7030%$3,000—
45Trauma Violence & AbuseSAGE Publishing · United States
3.23Q13.85 0.12 down from 201513523%$3,900
3.22Q12.78 0.64 down from 20159445%$3,760
47Law and Human BehaviorAmerican Psychological Association · United States
3.21Q13.68 0.03 down from 201514735%—
48Development and PsychopathologyCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
3.20Q13.86 0.71 down from 201540368%$3,550
49Journal of Traumatic StressWiley · Netherlands
3.20Q13.82 0.97 down from 201529538%$3,120
50Journal of Youth and AdolescenceSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
3.17Q13.33 0.53 down from 201549444%$3,890

Citations made in 2016. Corpus-wide, 77.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

219 additional Psychology journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2013–2015, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2016. Publication window: 2013–2015. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
953
Window papers (baseline)
308,630 +18.8% from indicator year 2013
Median OJR
1.003 -1.5% from indicator year 2013
Rising journals (2025)
68Comparison-group list (68)

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2013–2015 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals5195485775906096276506777137367597898128368729149539761,0001,0081,0321,0321,0441,0491,0361,032
Window papers (baseline)100,368108,714116,356126,019132,361141,328150,104163,997178,881196,566212,190230,053245,061259,850274,026290,061308,630323,270336,144346,025361,777394,757437,922469,605479,050491,558
Median OJR0.670.680.690.730.760.770.790.830.8670.900.9200.941.01781.01831.0171.011.0031.0010.980.930.950.850.8720.8690.9150.9249
Category context (2025)
MeasureCategory statisticEligible population
Journal self-citation shareMedian: 3.9%730 journals
Retracted papers per 1,000Pooled rate: 0.819 per 1,000625 journals
Output growthMedian: -1.9%962 journals
Open access shareMedian: 55.7%1,032 journals
Listed APC (USD)Median including $0 listed prices: $3,390484 ranked journals with a known listed price, including $0 listed prices
International collaboration shareMedian: 21.7%951 journals
Review shareMedian: 2.1%1,032 journals
Articles-only OJRMedian: 0.961,023 journals
Uncited shareMedian: 36.5%1,032 journals
Citation concentrationMedian: 45.5%1,030 journals

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.