OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2017

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Field ranking · 2017

Psychology journal rankings 2017

976 ranked journals · Field in Social Sciences

Psychology has 976 ranked journals in 2017. The median journal has an OJR of 1.00, level with the world average of 1.00, unchanged on 2016; Q1 starts at OJR 1.69. The top three are Therapeutic Recreation Journal, Perspectives on Psychological Science, and Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2017. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2014–2016, the window the 2017 score is computed on.

976
16% of Social Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.00
This fieldAll 0.84World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

21%
All fields: 32%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,500
Median positive listed APC: $3,500 among 413 journals. Another 10 list $0; 553 have no known price. All fields: $3,350.

Subfields in Psychology (7)

Up to Social Sciences

976 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Psychology ranking, 2017

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2016. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2014–2016, the window the 2017 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2014–2016 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2008 to 2017.

Compare
15.84Q10.45 32.42 down from 20167710%—
2Perspectives on Psychological ScienceSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
8.66Q111.77 1.40 up from 201621041%$3,900
3Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyAmerican Psychological Association · United States
7.38Q18.50 0.16 up from 201636027%—
4Psychological BulletinAmerican Psychological Association · United States
7.38Q116.66 2.21 down from 201613139%—
5Psychological MethodsAmerican Psychological Association · United States
5.87Q18.94 3.09 up from 201610936%—
6World PsychiatryWiley · Italy
5.63Q18.65 0.68 up from 201627697%—
7JAMA PsychiatryAmerican Medical Association · United States
5.62Q19.78 0.62 down from 201675256%—
8Journal of the Learning SciencesRoutledge · United States
5.52Q13.68 0.48 up from 20166110%—
9Human DevelopmentKarger Publishers · Switzerland
5.30Q15.57 0.90 up from 201610043%—
10Contemporary Educational PsychologyElsevier BV · Netherlands
4.79Q13.96 1.22 down from 201614831%$4,720
11Child Development PerspectivesWiley · United Kingdom
4.76Q14.81 1.06 down from 201614841%$3,700
12Journal of Behavioral AddictionsOAAkadémiai Kiadó · Hungary
4.76Q14.66 1.51 down from 2016162100%$916
13Child DevelopmentWiley · United Kingdom
4.72Q14.56 0.80 down from 201645552%$4,320
14European Journal of PersonalitySAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
4.63Q14.70 0.55 down from 201612239%$3,900
15Developmental ReviewElsevier BV · United States
4.57Q16.23 1.02 down from 20166629%$4,330
16Reading Research QuarterlyWiley · United States
4.33Q13.28 0.95 down from 20167931%$3,530
4.19Q12.21 1.63 up from 20166828%$3,650
4.11Q17.63 0.76 up from 201636662%$4,530
19IEEE Transactions on Affective ComputingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
4.09Q15.65 0.08 down from 201616635%$2,645
20Journal of Computer Assisted LearningWiley · United Kingdom
3.98Q13.05 0.05 down from 201612425%$4,150
21American PsychologistAmerican Psychological Association · United States
3.94Q14.38 0.15 up from 201641824%—
22American Journal of PsychiatryAmerican Psychiatric Association · United States
3.90Q17.76 0.68 up from 201670574%—
23Philosophical PerspectivesWiley · United States
3.90Q11.90 0.97 up from 20164553%$2,760
24Journal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologyAmerican Psychological Association · United States
3.83Q16.54 0.12 up from 201630150%—
25ReCALLCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
3.81Q11.37 1.38 down from 20168145%$3,550
26Law and Human BehaviorAmerican Psychological Association · United States
3.78Q13.59 0.08 down from 201615134%—
27JMIR Serious GamesOAJMIR Publications · Canada
3.77Q15.26 0.61 down from 201644100%$2,500
28Behaviour Research and TherapyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
3.76Q15.58 0.04 up from 201639153%$3,580
3.75Q17.24 0.19 down from 20161,22498%—
30Developmental PsychologyAmerican Psychological Association · United States
3.69Q14.24 0.10 up from 201649743%—
31Journal of Counseling PsychologyAmerican Psychological Association · United States
3.69Q15.38 1.28 up from 201618716%—
32Educational Psychology ReviewSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
3.63Q15.48 0.25 up from 201613729%$4,790
33International Journal of Language and CultureJohn Benjamins Publishing Company · Netherlands
3.55Q14.38 3.72 up from 2016380%—
34Language LearningWiley · United States
3.54Q13.66 0.24 up from 201616324%$3,760
35Journal of Abnormal PsychologyAmerican Psychological Association · United States
3.48Q15.72 0.07 up from 201629643%—
36Current Psychiatry ReportsSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
3.44Q16.43 0.68 up from 201631333%$4,990
37Personality Disorders Theory Research and TreatmentAmerican Psychological Association · United States
3.38Q13.78 0.21 up from 201616537%—
38Journal of Aging StudiesElsevier BV · United Kingdom
3.33Q12.32 0.23 down from 201615418%$3,340
39Instructional ScienceSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
3.28Q13.34 0.32 up from 20168924%$3,290
3.22Q13.54 0.21 up from 201617519%$3,530
41Clinical Psychological ScienceSAGE Publishing · United States
3.20Q14.31 1.43 down from 201620956%$3,900
42Journal of PersonalityWiley · United States
3.17Q13.40 0.44 down from 201618832%$3,780
43Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent PsychologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
3.15Q13.84 0.34 down from 201630367%—
44JMIR Mental HealthOAJMIR Publications · Canada
3.13Q16.75 1.38 up from 201680100%$2,750
45Language Assessment QuarterlyTaylor & Francis · United States
3.12Q11.42 0.41 down from 2016679%—
46Dialogues in Clinical NeuroscienceOALaboratoires Servier · United Kingdom
3.09Q15.84 0.61 up from 2016134100%—
47Depression and AnxietyWiley · United States
3.08Q16.14 0.41 up from 201632178%$2,490
48Human Resource Development ReviewSAGE Publishing · United States
3.07Q13.38 0.34 up from 20165111%$3,900
49Metacognition and LearningSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
3.06Q13.44 0.31 down from 20165431%$3,290
50Psychological AssessmentAmerican Psychological Association · United States
3.05Q14.07 0.44 up from 201648030%—

Citations made in 2017. Corpus-wide, 77.7% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

247 additional Psychology journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2014–2016, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2017. Publication window: 2014–2016. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
976
Window papers (baseline)
323,270 +18.0% from indicator year 2014
Median OJR
1.001 -1.6% from indicator year 2014
Rising journals (2025)
68Comparison-group list (68)

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2014–2016 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals5195485775906096276506777137367597898128368729149539761,0001,0081,0321,0321,0441,0491,0361,032
Window papers (baseline)100,368108,714116,356126,019132,361141,328150,104163,997178,881196,566212,190230,053245,061259,850274,026290,061308,630323,270336,144346,025361,777394,757437,922469,605479,050491,558
Median OJR0.670.680.690.730.760.770.790.830.8670.900.9200.941.01781.01831.0171.011.0031.0010.980.930.950.850.8720.8690.9150.9249
Category context (2025)
MeasureCategory statisticEligible population
Journal self-citation shareMedian: 3.9%730 journals
Retracted papers per 1,000Pooled rate: 0.819 per 1,000625 journals
Output growthMedian: -1.9%962 journals
Open access shareMedian: 55.7%1,032 journals
Listed APC (USD)Median including $0 listed prices: $3,390484 ranked journals with a known listed price, including $0 listed prices
International collaboration shareMedian: 21.7%951 journals
Review shareMedian: 2.1%1,032 journals
Articles-only OJRMedian: 0.961,023 journals
Uncited shareMedian: 36.5%1,032 journals
Citation concentrationMedian: 45.5%1,030 journals

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.