OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2019

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Field ranking · 2019

Psychology journal rankings 2019

1,008 ranked journals · Field in Social Sciences

Psychology has 1,008 ranked journals in 2019. The median OJR fell 0.05 on 2018 to 0.93, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.62. The top three are Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, Psychological Bulletin, and Perspectives on Psychological Science.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2019. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2016–2018, the window the 2019 score is computed on.

1,008
16% of Social Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.93-0.05 vs 2018
This fieldAll 0.82World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

23%
All fields: 34%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,490
Median positive listed APC: $3,490 among 429 journals. Another 10 list $0; 569 have no known price. All fields: $3,310.

Subfields in Psychology (7)

Up to Social Sciences

1,008 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Psychology ranking, 2019

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2018. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2016–2018, the window the 2019 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2016–2018 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2010 to 2019.

Compare
13.61Q117.05no 2018 value4368%$2,000—
2Psychological BulletinAmerican Psychological Association · United States
8.92Q123.91 2.84 up from 201812639%—
3Perspectives on Psychological ScienceSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
8.31Q113.19 1.14 up from 201825658%$3,900
4Journal of the Learning SciencesRoutledge · United States
6.68Q17.46 2.85 up from 20186021%—
5Child Development PerspectivesWiley · United Kingdom
6.66Q18.68 3.18 up from 201813946%$3,700
6World PsychiatryWiley · Italy
6.51Q112.61 1.72 up from 201829697%—
7Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyAmerican Psychological Association · United States
5.91Q17.39 0.84 down from 201833429%—
8Psychological MethodsAmerican Psychological Association · United States
5.65Q19.05 1.09 up from 201813234%—
9JAMA PsychiatryAmerican Medical Association · United States
4.79Q19.14 0.17 up from 201883963%—
10Child DevelopmentWiley · United Kingdom
4.67Q16.26 1.40 up from 201868660%$4,320
11Journal of Behavioral AddictionsOAAkadémiai Kiadó · Hungary
4.63Q16.38 0.10 down from 2018306100%$916
12Journal of Counseling PsychologyAmerican Psychological Association · United States
4.47Q14.76 0.81 down from 201819014%—
13Journal of Abnormal PsychologyAmerican Psychological Association · United States
4.35Q18.72 0.99 up from 201825836%—
14The Lancet Public HealthOAElsevier BV · United Kingdom
4.27Q17.31 1.18 up from 2018274100%$6,680
15Developmental ReviewElsevier BV · United States
4.27Q16.94 1.06 down from 20186128%$4,330
16Human Resource Development ReviewSAGE Publishing · United States
4.01Q14.97 0.95 up from 20186050%$3,900
17American PsychologistAmerican Psychological Association · United States
3.98Q15.58 1.95 up from 201845625%—
3.90Q17.69 0.72 up from 201837570%$4,530
3.88Q14.76 0.32 up from 201814828%$3,530
20American Journal of PsychiatryAmerican Psychiatric Association · United States
3.82Q17.57 0.47 down from 201864465%—
21Reading Research QuarterlyWiley · United States
3.77Q14.00 0.80 up from 20188234%$3,530
22Contemporary Educational PsychologyElsevier BV · Netherlands
3.71Q14.37 0.39 up from 201820035%$4,720
23Journal of Computer Assisted LearningWiley · United Kingdom
3.65Q14.08 0.56 down from 201820633%$4,150
24Cognitive LinguisticsOADe Gruyter Mouton · Germany
3.64Q13.38 1.19 up from 20188552%$0 listed
25Developmental PsychologyAmerican Psychological Association · United States
3.62Q14.62 0.13 up from 201856534%—
26Scientific Studies of ReadingTaylor & Francis · United States
3.59Q14.68 1.52 up from 201811249%—
27Educational Psychology ReviewSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
3.54Q17.04 0.97 up from 20189540%$4,790
28Dialogues in Clinical NeuroscienceOALaboratoires Servier · United Kingdom
3.46Q17.28 0.89 up from 2018122100%—
29The Lancet PsychiatryElsevier BV · United Kingdom
3.45Q15.86 0.02 down from 201881453%$7,280
30European Journal of PersonalitySAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
3.39Q15.21 0.70 up from 201812744%$3,900
31Journal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologyAmerican Psychological Association · United States
3.37Q15.91 0.25 down from 201829838%—
32Language LearningWiley · United States
3.35Q16.19 2.38 up from 201814552%$3,760
33International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative LearningSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
3.28Q15.68 2.13 up from 20185959%$3,290
34Emotion ReviewSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
3.28Q15.30 1.18 up from 201814633%$3,900
35IEEE Transactions on Affective ComputingInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · United States
3.27Q16.45 1.77 up from 201823945%$2,645
36Clinical Psychological ScienceSAGE Publishing · United States
3.26Q16.18 1.96 up from 201823963%$3,900
37Annual Review of Clinical PsychologyAnnual Reviews · United States
3.25Q118.12 1.27 down from 20186067%—
38Current Psychiatry ReportsSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
3.25Q16.98 0.59 up from 201833534%$4,990
3.23Q16.61 0.66 down from 20181,25797%—
40Review of General PsychologySAGE Publishing · United States
3.22Q14.63 0.04 down from 201810844%$3,900
41Developmental ScienceWiley · United Kingdom
3.22Q15.32 0.40 up from 201837354%$4,140
42ReCALLCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
3.11Q12.44 0.50 up from 20187752%$3,550
3.10Q11.77 1.23 down from 20186816%$2,900
44Archives of Scientific PsychologyOAAmerican Psychological Association · United States
3.09Q12.68 4.20 down from 201832100%$3,000
45Behaviour Research and TherapyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
3.08Q15.26 0.45 down from 201839455%$3,580
46Journal of AdolescenceWiley · Netherlands
3.05Q13.73 0.04 up from 201841838%$3,150
47The Journal of Sex ResearchTaylor & Francis · United States
3.04Q14.67 0.69 up from 201829536%—
48Journal of Youth and AdolescenceSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
3.01Q13.49 0.01 down from 201854752%$3,890
49Evolution and Human BehaviorElsevier BV · United States
2.99Q14.64 0.35 up from 201822640%$4,330
50Journal of PersonalityWiley · United States
2.97Q14.46 0.39 up from 201819344%$3,780

Citations made in 2019. Corpus-wide, 83.4% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

268 additional Psychology journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2016–2018, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2019. Publication window: 2016–2018. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
1,008
Window papers (baseline)
346,025 +12.1% from indicator year 2016
Median OJR
0.93 -7.7% from indicator year 2016
Rising journals (2025)
68Comparison-group list (68)

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2016–2018 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals5195485775906096276506777137367597898128368729149539761,0001,0081,0321,0321,0441,0491,0361,032
Window papers (baseline)100,368108,714116,356126,019132,361141,328150,104163,997178,881196,566212,190230,053245,061259,850274,026290,061308,630323,270336,144346,025361,777394,757437,922469,605479,050491,558
Median OJR0.670.680.690.730.760.770.790.830.8670.900.9200.941.01781.01831.0171.011.0031.0010.980.930.950.850.8720.8690.9150.9249
Category context (2025)
MeasureCategory statisticEligible population
Journal self-citation shareMedian: 3.9%730 journals
Retracted papers per 1,000Pooled rate: 0.819 per 1,000625 journals
Output growthMedian: -1.9%962 journals
Open access shareMedian: 55.7%1,032 journals
Listed APC (USD)Median including $0 listed prices: $3,390484 ranked journals with a known listed price, including $0 listed prices
International collaboration shareMedian: 21.7%951 journals
Review shareMedian: 2.1%1,032 journals
Articles-only OJRMedian: 0.961,023 journals
Uncited shareMedian: 36.5%1,032 journals
Citation concentrationMedian: 45.5%1,030 journals

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.