OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2016

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2016

Urban Studies journal rankings 2016

42 ranked journals · Subfield in Social Sciences

Urban Studies has 42 ranked journals in 2016. The median OJR fell 0.25 on 2015 to 1.63, above the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 3.29. The top three are Progress in Planning, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, and Planning Theory.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2016. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2013–2015, the window the 2016 score is computed on.

42
1% of Social Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.63-0.25 vs 2015
This subfieldAll 0.86World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

26%
All fields: 30%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,650
Median positive listed APC: $3,650 among 9 journals. 33 have no known price. All fields: $3,390.

Subfields of Social Sciences (22)

Show all 22 subfields

42 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Urban Studies ranking, 2016

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2015. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2013–2015, the window the 2016 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2013–2015 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2007 to 2016.

Compare
1Progress in PlanningElsevier BV · United Kingdom
9.00Q14.76 1.80 up from 20153627%$4,250
5.63Q11.94 0.75 down from 201539923%$4,150
3Planning TheorySAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
5.29Q12.93 1.18 up from 20157927%$3,650
4Urban StudiesSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
5.15Q12.61no change67326%$3,900
5CityTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
4.73Q12.54 1.00 up from 201522027%—
6Cultural TrendsTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
4.44Q11.60 0.05 up from 20159343%—
7European Planning StudiesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
4.38Q12.38 0.89 up from 201529433%—
8Environment and UrbanizationSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
3.91Q12.54 0.68 down from 201513168%$3,650
9City Culture and SocietyElsevier BV · Netherlands
3.44Q11.22 0.07 down from 20158818%$3,470
10International Journal of Cultural PolicyRoutledge · United Kingdom
3.43Q11.31 0.27 up from 201514023%—
11Urban GeographyTaylor & Francis · United States
3.29Q11.55 0.27 down from 201526327%—
12Journal of Urban AffairsTaylor & Francis · United States
3.00Q21.21 0.10 down from 20152409%—
13Planning Practice and ResearchTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
2.81Q21.45 0.25 down from 20159340%—
14Planning Theory & PracticeRoutledge · United Kingdom
2.67Q21.53 0.06 up from 201510436%—
15Urban Policy and ResearchTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
2.62Q21.55 0.05 down from 201510323%—
16Urban Research & PracticeTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
2.58Q21.62 0.64 up from 20157824%—
17Journal of Urban DesignTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
2.34Q21.47 0.32 up from 201510623%—
18Home CulturesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.95Q20.82 0.42 up from 20155330%—
1.90Q21.28 0.43 up from 20158540%—
20International Planning StudiesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.70Q20.80 0.09 down from 20157624%—
21Town Planning ReviewLiverpool University Press · United Kingdom
1.68Q20.82 0.16 down from 201515328%—
22International Journal of Urban Sustainable DevelopmentOATaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.58Q30.92 0.08 down from 201551100%$1,270
23City Territory and ArchitectureOASpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.47Q30.83 0.25 up from 201530100%$1,140
24Planning PerspectivesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.47Q30.43 0.10 down from 201523214%—
25Creative Industries JournalTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.38Q30.64 0.43 up from 20154027%—
26Built EnvironmentAlexandrine Press · United Kingdom
1.30Q30.44 0.06 down from 201512511%—
27Canadian journal of nonprofit and social economy researchOACanadian Institute for Studies in Publishing · Canada
1.08Q30.32 0.32 down from 201542100%—
0.91Q30.59 0.16 up from 20156124%—
29Revue de la régulationOAUMR ESPACE et UMR LISST · France
0.81Q30.35 0.35 down from 2015147100%—
30urbe Revista Brasileira de Gestão UrbanaOAEditora Universitária Champagnat · Brazil
0.72Q30.32 0.04 down from 201582100%—
31ACE Arquitectura Ciudad y EntornoOAUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya · Spain
0.71Q30.34 0.23 up from 201570100%$215
0.59Q30.46 0.46 up from 2015570%—
33ArtifactOAIntellect · United Kingdom
0.55Q40.38 0.16 up from 201534100%—
0.53Q40.29 0.01 up from 2015116100%—
35Journal of Urban Cultural StudiesIntellect · United Kingdom
0.46Q40.15 0.05 down from 20155412%—
36Interventions économiquesOAAssociation d'Economie Politique · Canada
0.46Q40.11 0.12 down from 2015111100%—
37disP - The Planning ReviewTaylor & Francis · Switzerland
0.45Q40.29 0.22 down from 201520115%—
38METU Journal of the Faculty of ArchitectureOAMiddle East Technical University · Türkiye
0.41Q40.13 0.08 down from 201570100%—
39CiudadesOAUniversity of Valladolid · Spain
0.17Q40.10 0.08 up from 201591100%—
40Espaço AbertoOAFederal University of Rio de Janeiro · Brazil
0.12Q40.03 0.02 down from 201559100%—
0.09Q40.05 0.02 up from 2015919%—
42Creative Industries FacultyPublisher not listed
0.08Q40.05 0.06 down from 2015330%—

Citations made in 2016. Corpus-wide, 77.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

17 additional Urban Studies journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2013–2015, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2016. Publication window: 2013–2015. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
42
Window papers (baseline)
43,576 +19.7% from indicator year 2013
Median OJR
1.63 +8.2% from indicator year 2013
Rising journals (2025)
1

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2013–2015 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1717191819212225282832333639384042454948525150525454
Window papers (baseline)9,54410,54611,87713,66114,89716,53018,45920,67523,07425,73229,12331,71934,19536,41738,95641,57943,57645,24745,81046,25646,76248,16749,00547,86845,85246,221
Median OJR1.3221.241.411.3201.4971.831.951.741.772.072.142.292.041.5051.801.881.631.551.421.291.351.081.170.880.840.98

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.