OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2016

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2016

Library and Information Sciences journal rankings 2016

43 ranked journals · Subfield in Social Sciences

Library and Information Sciences has 43 ranked journals in 2016. The median OJR fell 0.10 on 2015 to 1.08, above the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 2.08. The top three are College & Research Libraries, portal Libraries and the Academy, and The Library Quarterly.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2016. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2013–2015, the window the 2016 score is computed on.

43
2% of Social Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.08-0.10 vs 2015
This subfieldAll 0.86World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

37%
All fields: 30%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,650
Median positive listed APC: $3,650 among 4 journals. Another 1 lists $0; 38 have no known price. All fields: $3,390.

Subfields of Social Sciences (22)

Show all 22 subfields

43 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Library and Information Sciences ranking, 2016

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2015. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2013–2015, the window the 2016 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2013–2015 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2007 to 2016.

Compare
1College & Research LibrariesOAAssociation of College and Research Libraries · United States
5.41Q12.80 0.43 down from 2015165100%—
2portal Libraries and the AcademyJohns Hopkins University Press · United States
4.36Q11.74 0.48 down from 201514217%—
3The Library QuarterlyUniversity of Chicago Press · United States
4.14Q11.11 0.57 down from 2015878%—
4The Journal of Academic LibrarianshipElsevier BV · United States
3.67Q12.38 0.22 up from 201529615%$3,990
5New Review of Academic LibrarianshipTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
3.04Q11.14 0.13 down from 20156949%—
6Journal of Librarianship and Information ScienceSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
2.62Q11.19 0.26 down from 2015948%$3,650
7Reference Services ReviewEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
2.61Q11.17 0.58 down from 201512621%—
8Communications in Information LiteracyOACommunications in Information Literacy · United States
2.54Q11.92 0.76 up from 201567100%—
9LibriOADe Gruyter · Germany
2.53Q11.70 0.48 up from 20158517%$0 listed
10Journal of Library AdministrationTaylor & Francis · United States
2.29Q10.88 0.61 down from 201516512%—
2.08Q11.15 0.29 up from 20156711%—
1.96Q20.95 0.04 down from 201514898%—
13Journal of Information LiteracyOAChartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals · United Kingdom
1.90Q20.73 0.02 up from 201576100%—
1.76Q20.78 0.13 up from 20151151%—
15College & Undergraduate LibrariesTaylor & Francis · United States
1.64Q20.91 0.35 down from 20158211%—
16Library ReviewEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
1.63Q20.82 0.15 up from 20152178%—
17Library trendsJohns Hopkins University Press · United States
1.60Q20.46 0.37 down from 201514070%—
18Behavioral & Social Sciences LibrarianTaylor & Francis · United States
1.54Q20.95 0.42 down from 20155928%—
19Library ManagementEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
1.30Q20.51 0.54 down from 20152305%—
20IFLA JournalSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
1.15Q20.42 0.67 down from 20159730%$3,650
21Public & Access Services QuarterlyTaylor & Francis · United States
1.13Q20.44 0.17 down from 2015924%—
22The International Information & Library ReviewTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.08Q20.48 0.24 down from 2015576%—
1.05Q30.69 0.16 up from 201588100%—
24Performance Measurement and MetricsEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
1.02Q30.69 0.55 down from 2015518%—
0.99Q30.72 0.63 up from 20153515%$3,400
26Public Library QuarterlyTaylor & Francis · United States
0.87Q30.49no change7110%—
27School Libraries WorldwideInternational Association of School Librarianship · Canada
0.76Q30.47 0.05 up from 20155489%—
28The Australian Library JournalTaylor & Francis · Australia
0.75Q30.40 0.15 up from 2015332100%—
29Evidence Based Library and Information PracticeOAUniversity of Alberta · Canada
0.69Q30.43 0.19 down from 2015243100%—
30Canadian Journal of Information and Library ScienceOACanadian Association for Information Science · Canada
0.67Q30.63 0.06 up from 201565——
31College & Research Libraries NewsOAAssociation of College and Research Libraries · United States
0.59Q30.37 0.14 down from 201554899%—
32Journal of Business & Finance LibrarianshipTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.58Q30.35 0.04 up from 2015883%—
33Journal of Access ServicesTaylor & Francis · United States
0.57Q30.55 0.02 down from 20155518%—
34Reference & User Services QuarterlyAmerican Library Association · United States
0.51Q40.24no change56175%—
35Library and Information ResearchOALibrary and Information Research Group · United Kingdom
0.50Q40.41 0.25 up from 2015178100%—
0.38Q40.28 0.21 down from 2015102100%—
0.27Q40.13 0.04 down from 201510484%—
38Children and LibrariesOAAmerican Library Association · United States
0.24Q40.11 0.02 up from 20159992%—
39Community & Junior College LibrariesTaylor & Francis · United States
0.20Q40.18 0.14 down from 20153514%—
0.16Q40.25 0.02 up from 201547100%—
41Virginia LibrariesOAVirginia Tech University Libraries · United States
0.15Q40.06 0.03 up from 201540——
42Maine policy reviewOAUnited States
0.03Q40.01 0.09 down from 2015142100%—
43SLIS ConnectingOAUniversity of Southern Mississippi · United States
0.00Q40.05 0.07 down from 201560100%—

Citations made in 2016. Corpus-wide, 77.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

9 additional Library and Information Sciences journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2013–2015, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2016. Publication window: 2013–2015. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
43
Window papers (baseline)
5,326 -12.4% from indicator year 2013
Median OJR
1.08 -21.8% from indicator year 2013
Rising journals (2025)
0

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2013–2015 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals2626283032303034363638393941434443414244414142414038
Window papers (baseline)2,6232,7303,0483,4033,6713,7723,8784,2384,7435,2345,6135,9206,1716,0835,8935,5195,3265,0694,9554,7704,6504,6104,5294,3804,1094,152
Median OJR0.630.6780.770.870.740.6800.960.9460.9530.830.92271.281.291.391.10001.191.081.10020.9540.92280.9950.880.940.750.860.79

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.