OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2012

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2012

Library and Information Sciences journal rankings 2012

39 ranked journals · Subfield in Social Sciences

Library and Information Sciences has 39 ranked journals in 2012. Its median journal scores above the world average: OJR 1.29 against 1.00, up 0.01 on 2011. A journal needs OJR 2.23 to reach Q1. The top three are Journal of Library Administration, College & Research Libraries, and The Journal of Academic Librarianship.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2012. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2009–2011, the window the 2012 score is computed on.

39
2% of Social Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.29+0.01 vs 2011
This subfieldAll 0.94World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

33%
All fields: 24%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,650
Median positive listed APC: $3,650 among 3 journals. Another 1 lists $0; 35 have no known price. All fields: $3,413.

Subfields of Social Sciences (22)

Show all 22 subfields

39 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Library and Information Sciences ranking, 2012

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2011. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2009–2011, the window the 2012 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2009–2011 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2003 to 2012.

Compare
1Journal of Library AdministrationTaylor & Francis · United States
3.71Q11.83 0.86 up from 20111977%—
2College & Research LibrariesOAAssociation of College and Research Libraries · United States
3.64Q12.70 1.38 up from 2011169100%—
3The Journal of Academic LibrarianshipElsevier BV · United States
3.40Q11.49 0.16 up from 20113038%$3,990
4The Library QuarterlyUniversity of Chicago Press · United States
3.27Q10.93 0.23 down from 2011794%—
5Reference Services ReviewEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
3.06Q11.48 0.17 down from 201113611%—
6portal Libraries and the AcademyJohns Hopkins University Press · United States
2.92Q10.79 0.07 down from 201113113%—
7Library trendsJohns Hopkins University Press · United States
2.85Q11.07 0.26 up from 201113125%—
8Journal of Information LiteracyOAChartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals · United Kingdom
2.71Q11.48 0.36 up from 201149100%—
9Journal of Librarianship and Information ScienceSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
2.69Q10.87 1.02 down from 20116912%$3,650
2.23Q10.70 0.71 down from 2011610%—
11New Review of Academic LibrarianshipTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
2.06Q21.22 0.04 up from 2011510%—
1.76Q20.50 0.27 down from 2011617%—
13Behavioral & Social Sciences LibrarianTaylor & Francis · United States
1.75Q20.95 0.10 down from 2011556%—
14Library ManagementEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
1.60Q20.82 0.20 up from 20112368%—
15The International Information & Library ReviewTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.51Q20.79 0.27 up from 20112000%—
16Public & Access Services QuarterlyTaylor & Francis · United States
1.49Q21.12 0.84 up from 20111277%—
17Communications in Information LiteracyOACommunications in Information Literacy · United States
1.49Q20.79 0.29 up from 201146100%—
18LibriOADe Gruyter · Germany
1.34Q20.91 0.52 up from 20118617%$0 listed
19Library ReviewEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
1.31Q20.60 0.05 up from 20113183%—
20College & Undergraduate LibrariesTaylor & Francis · United States
1.29Q20.51 0.05 down from 2011934%—
21IFLA JournalSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
1.28Q30.41 0.04 up from 201112718%$3,650
22Performance Measurement and MetricsEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
1.24Q31.05 0.09 up from 2011629%—
1.20Q30.60 0.23 up from 201114292%—
24Public Library QuarterlyTaylor & Francis · United States
1.16Q30.79 0.19 up from 2011688%—
0.95Q30.38 0.17 up from 201194100%—
26Canadian Journal of Information and Library ScienceOACanadian Association for Information Science · Canada
0.94Q30.55 0.23 up from 201153100%—
27The Australian Library JournalTaylor & Francis · Australia
0.92Q30.41 0.19 up from 20119073%—
28Reference & User Services QuarterlyAmerican Library Association · United States
0.65Q30.25 0.08 down from 201153673%—
29Library and Information ResearchOALibrary and Information Research Group · United Kingdom
0.60Q30.33 0.08 down from 2011137100%—
30College & Research Libraries NewsOAAssociation of College and Research Libraries · United States
0.55Q30.35 0.12 up from 201157096%—
31Evidence Based Library and Information PracticeOAUniversity of Alberta · Canada
0.54Q40.35 0.02 up from 2011230100%—
32Journal of Access ServicesTaylor & Francis · United States
0.49Q40.29 0.04 down from 2011940%—
33Community & Junior College LibrariesTaylor & Francis · United States
0.43Q40.17 0.01 down from 20111020%—
34Journal of Business & Finance LibrarianshipTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.41Q40.34 0.13 down from 20111050%—
0.34Q40.04 0.04 down from 201151100%—
36Virginia LibrariesOAVirginia Tech University Libraries · United States
0.21Q40.00 0.15 down from 201155100%—
0.08Q40.00 0.04 down from 20116689%—
38Library and Leadership ManagementPublisher not listed
0.07Q40.02 0.12 down from 2011820%—
39Maine policy reviewOAUnited States
0.02Q40.05 0.02 down from 20117797%—

Citations made in 2012. Corpus-wide, 75.7% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

9 additional Library and Information Sciences journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2009–2011, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2012. Publication window: 2009–2011. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
39
Window papers (baseline)
6,171 +17.9% from indicator year 2009
Median OJR
1.29 +55.6% from indicator year 2009
Rising journals (2025)
0

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2009–2011 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals2626283032303034363638393941434443414244414142414038
Window papers (baseline)2,6232,7303,0483,4033,6713,7723,8784,2384,7435,2345,6135,9206,1716,0835,8935,5195,3265,0694,9554,7704,6504,6104,5294,3804,1094,152
Median OJR0.630.6780.770.870.740.6800.960.9460.9530.830.92271.281.291.391.10001.191.081.10020.9540.92280.9950.880.940.750.860.79

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.