OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2011

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2011

Library and Information Sciences journal rankings 2011

39 ranked journals · Subfield in Social Sciences

Library and Information Sciences has 39 ranked journals in 2011. The median OJR rose 0.36 on 2010 to 1.28, above the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 2.58. The top three are The Library Quarterly, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, and The Journal of Academic Librarianship.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2011. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2008–2010, the window the 2011 score is computed on.

39
2% of Social Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

1.28+0.36 vs 2010
This subfieldAll 0.94World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

31%
All fields: 22%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,650
Median positive listed APC: $3,650 among 4 journals. Another 1 lists $0; 34 have no known price. All fields: $3,470.

Subfields of Social Sciences (22)

Show all 22 subfields

39 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Library and Information Sciences ranking, 2011

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2010. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2008–2010, the window the 2011 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2008–2010 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2002 to 2011.

Compare
1The Library QuarterlyUniversity of Chicago Press · United States
4.13Q11.16 0.04 down from 2010695%—
2Journal of Librarianship and Information ScienceSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
4.13Q11.89 0.45 up from 20105516%$3,650
3The Journal of Academic LibrarianshipElsevier BV · United States
3.71Q11.33 0.24 down from 20102937%$3,990
4Reference Services ReviewEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
3.52Q11.65 0.20 up from 20101299%—
3.30Q11.41 0.12 down from 2010590%—
6College & Research LibrariesOAAssociation of College and Research Libraries · United States
3.24Q11.32 0.04 up from 2010167100%—
7Library trendsJohns Hopkins University Press · United States
2.80Q10.81 0.31 down from 201013349%—
2.63Q10.77 0.06 up from 2010393%—
9New Review of Academic LibrarianshipTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
2.60Q11.18 0.66 up from 20104719%—
10Journal of Library AdministrationTaylor & Francis · United States
2.58Q10.97 0.05 up from 20102279%—
11portal Libraries and the AcademyJohns Hopkins University Press · United States
2.56Q20.87 0.21 down from 20101479%—
12Performance Measurement and MetricsEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
2.16Q20.96 0.09 down from 2010680%—
13College & Undergraduate LibrariesTaylor & Francis · United States
2.15Q20.56 0.17 down from 2010943%—
14Library ReviewEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
2.09Q20.55 0.70 down from 20103543%—
15Journal of Information LiteracyOAChartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals · United Kingdom
1.96Q21.13 0.83 up from 201048100%—
16LibriOADe Gruyter · Germany
1.82Q20.40 0.37 down from 20108812%$0 listed
17Library ManagementEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom
1.39Q20.62 0.05 up from 20102609%—
18Behavioral & Social Sciences LibrarianTaylor & Francis · United States
1.33Q21.06 0.64 up from 2010630%—
19Public Library QuarterlyTaylor & Francis · United States
1.31Q20.60 0.22 up from 2010750%—
20Communications in Information LiteracyOACommunications in Information Literacy · United States
1.28Q20.50 0.14 up from 201046100%—
21The International Information & Library ReviewTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.22Q30.52 0.11 down from 20102021%—
22The Australian Library JournalTaylor & Francis · Australia
0.94Q30.22 0.19 down from 20108073%—
0.89Q30.37 0.03 up from 201014694%—
24IFLA JournalSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
0.85Q30.38 0.26 up from 20101398%$3,650
25Journal of Business & Finance LibrarianshipTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.75Q30.47 0.15 down from 20101392%—
26Library and Information ResearchOALibrary and Information Research Group · United Kingdom
0.75Q30.42 0.16 up from 2010144100%—
27Reference & User Services QuarterlyAmerican Library Association · United States
0.74Q30.33 0.02 up from 201048095%—
0.70Q30.21 0.01 down from 201092100%—
29Evidence Based Library and Information PracticeOAUniversity of Alberta · Canada
0.66Q30.34 0.12 up from 2010203100%—
30Journal of Access ServicesTaylor & Francis · United States
0.65Q30.33 0.06 up from 20101364%—
31Public & Access Services QuarterlyTaylor & Francis · United States
0.57Q40.28 0.02 up from 20101596%—
32Virginia LibrariesOAVirginia Tech University Libraries · United States
0.47Q40.15 0.15 up from 201052100%—
33Community & Junior College LibrariesTaylor & Francis · United States
0.44Q40.19 0.01 down from 2010910%—
34College & Research Libraries NewsOAAssociation of College and Research Libraries · United States
0.40Q40.24 0.08 up from 201056697%—
35Library and Leadership ManagementPublisher not listed
0.29Q40.13 0.01 up from 2010930%—
0.21Q40.08 0.72 down from 201050100%—
37Maine policy reviewOAUnited States
0.07Q40.06 0.02 up from 20106591%—
0.05Q40.04 0.02 up from 20107674%—
0.00Q40.00no change316%$3,400

Citations made in 2011. Corpus-wide, 75.1% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

9 additional Library and Information Sciences journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2008–2010, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2011. Publication window: 2008–2010. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
39
Window papers (baseline)
5,920 +24.8% from indicator year 2008
Median OJR
1.28 +34.4% from indicator year 2008
Rising journals (2025)
0

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2008–2010 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals2626283032303034363638393941434443414244414142414038
Window papers (baseline)2,6232,7303,0483,4033,6713,7723,8784,2384,7435,2345,6135,9206,1716,0835,8935,5195,3265,0694,9554,7704,6504,6104,5294,3804,1094,152
Median OJR0.630.6780.770.870.740.6800.960.9460.9530.830.92271.281.291.391.10001.191.081.10020.9540.92280.9950.880.940.750.860.79

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.