Journal rankings · indicator year 2002
Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.
Subfield ranking · 2002
Library and Information Sciences journal rankings 2002
28 ranked journals · Subfield in Social Sciences
Library and Information Sciences has 28 ranked journals in 2002. The median OJR rose 0.09 on 2001 to 0.77, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.23. The top three are College & Research Libraries, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, and New Review of Academic Librarianship.
Ranks and citation indicators: 2002. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.
Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 1999–2001, the window the 2002 score is computed on.
The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.
The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.
The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.
Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.
Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.
Subfields of Social Sciences (22)
28 ranked journals
Filters
Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest. | OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields. The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list. | Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field. ▲ or ▼ is the change from 2001. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. | Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 1999–2001, the window the 2002 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked. | Share of the journal’s 1999–2001 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal. | List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed. | The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2002. | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1College & Research LibrariesOAAssociation of College and Research Libraries · United States | 3.48Q1 | 1.61 0.66 up from 2001 | 138 | 100% | — | ||
2The Journal of Academic LibrarianshipElsevier BV · United States | 2.89Q1 | 1.69 0.72 up from 2001 | 309 | 1% | $3,990 | ||
3New Review of Academic LibrarianshipTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom | 2.38Q1 | 0.78 0.50 up from 2001 | 37 | 0% | — | ||
4Reference Services ReviewEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom | 1.88Q1 | 1.03 0.35 up from 2001 | 105 | 0% | — | ||
5Australian Academic & Research LibrariesRoutledge · Australia | 1.64Q1 | 0.58 0.35 up from 2001 | 91 | 92% | — | ||
6Reference & User Services QuarterlyAmerican Library Association · United States | 1.58Q1 | 0.64 0.05 down from 2001 | 105 | 0% | — | ||
7portal Libraries and the AcademyJohns Hopkins University Press · United States | 1.23Q1 | 0.33no 2001 value | 76 | 8% | — | — | |
8Community & Junior College LibrariesTaylor & Francis · United States | 1.18Q2 | 0.42 0.01 down from 2001 | 64 | 0% | — | ||
9Journal of Education for Library and Information ScienceUniversity of Toronto Press | 1.02Q2 | 0.36 0.04 up from 2001 | 109 | 6% | — | ||
10LibriOADe Gruyter · Germany | 0.95Q2 | 0.34 0.19 up from 2001 | 85 | 3% | $0 listed | ||
11Library ManagementEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom | 0.92Q2 | 0.53 0.15 up from 2001 | 213 | 5% | — | ||
12The Australian Library JournalTaylor & Francis · Australia | 0.88Q2 | 0.37 0.07 up from 2001 | 80 | 85% | — | ||
13Library ReviewEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom | 0.82Q2 | 0.24 0.01 up from 2001 | 360 | 2% | — | ||
14Research StrategiesPergamon Press · United States | 0.78Q2 | 0.24 0.34 down from 2001 | 74 | — | — | ||
15Journal of Business & Finance LibrarianshipTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom | 0.76Q3 | 0.25 0.11 down from 2001 | 91 | 5% | — | ||
16Journal of Librarianship and Information ScienceSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom | 0.74Q3 | 0.36 0.12 up from 2001 | 98 | 4% | $3,650 | ||
17The Library QuarterlyUniversity of Chicago Press · United States | 0.66Q3 | 0.29 0.10 up from 2001 | 118 | 0% | — | ||
18Journal of Library AdministrationTaylor & Francis · United States | 0.59Q3 | 0.34 0.22 up from 2001 | 358 | 4% | — | ||
19IFLA JournalSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom | 0.58Q3 | 0.28 0.02 up from 2001 | 163 | 5% | $3,650 | ||
20College & Undergraduate LibrariesTaylor & Francis · United States | 0.44Q3 | 0.20 0.21 down from 2001 | 59 | 0% | — | ||
21Alexandria The Journal of National and International Library and Information IssuesSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom | 0.44Q3 | 0.32 0.25 down from 2001 | 53 | 4% | $3,400 | ||
22College & Research Libraries NewsOAAssociation of College and Research Libraries · United States | 0.32Q4 | 0.12 0.02 down from 2001 | 567 | 99% | — | ||
23Behavioral & Social Sciences LibrarianTaylor & Francis · United States | 0.23Q4 | 0.21 0.12 up from 2001 | 49 | 0% | — | ||
24Public Library QuarterlyTaylor & Francis · United States | 0.20Q4 | 0.05 0.04 down from 2001 | 144 | 0% | — | ||
25Maine policy reviewOAUnited States | 0.17Q4 | 0.18 0.15 up from 2001 | 42 | 100% | — | ||
26The International Information & Library ReviewTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom | 0.16Q4 | 0.07 0.07 down from 2001 | 143 | 2% | — | ||
27School Libraries WorldwideInternational Association of School Librarianship · Canada | 0.07Q4 | 0.01 0.50 down from 2001 | 114 | 100% | — | ||
28Virginia LibrariesOAVirginia Tech University Libraries · United States | 0.00Q4 | 0.00no change | 56 | 100% | — |
Subfields of Social Sciences, with Library and Information Sciences highlighted.
- Sociology and Political Science642
- Education333
- Political Science and International Relations198
- Public Administration44
- Gender Studies35
- Communication32
- Safety Research30
- Health29
- Linguistics and Language29
- Library and Information Sciences28
- Anthropology26
- Law26
- Demography22
- Transportation21
- Urban Studies19
- Geography, Planning and Development15
- Cultural Studies7
- Development2
- General Social Sciences1
- Archeology0
- Human Factors and Ergonomics0
- Life-span and Life-course Studies0
Journals
Citations made in 2002. Corpus-wide, 69.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.
10 additional Library and Information Sciences journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 1999–2001, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.
At a glance
Indicator year: 2002. Publication window: 1999–2001. How these summaries are calculated
- Ranked journals
- 28
- Window papers (baseline)
- 3,048 Change unavailable from indicator year 1999
- Median OJR
- 0.77 Change unavailable from indicator year 1999
- Rising journals (2025)
- 0
Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 1999–2001 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.
| Measure | Year series | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranked journals | 26 | 26 | 28 | 30 | 32 | 30 | 30 | 34 | 36 | 36 | 38 | 39 | 39 | 41 | 43 | 44 | 43 | 41 | 42 | 44 | 41 | 41 | 42 | 41 | 40 | 38 | |
| Window papers (baseline) | 2,623 | 2,730 | 3,048 | 3,403 | 3,671 | 3,772 | 3,878 | 4,238 | 4,743 | 5,234 | 5,613 | 5,920 | 6,171 | 6,083 | 5,893 | 5,519 | 5,326 | 5,069 | 4,955 | 4,770 | 4,650 | 4,610 | 4,529 | 4,380 | 4,109 | 4,152 | |
| Median OJR | 0.63 | 0.678 | 0.77 | 0.87 | 0.74 | 0.680 | 0.96 | 0.946 | 0.953 | 0.83 | 0.9227 | 1.28 | 1.29 | 1.39 | 1.1000 | 1.19 | 1.08 | 1.1002 | 0.954 | 0.9228 | 0.995 | 0.88 | 0.94 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.79 |
How to read these rankings
- OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
- A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
- Quartiles
- Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
- Impact factor (2-year)
- Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
- Rank ranges
- Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.