OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2017

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2017

Neurology journal rankings 2017

20 ranked journals · Subfield in Neuroscience

Neurology has 20 ranked journals in 2017. The median OJR rose 0.12 on 2016 to 0.95, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.54. The top three are Journal of Neuroinflammation, Glia, and Tissue Barriers.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2017. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2014–2016, the window the 2017 score is computed on.

20
6% of Neuroscience
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.95+0.12 vs 2016
This subfieldAll 0.84World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

50%
All fields: 32%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$4,120
Median positive listed APC: $4,120 among 10 journals. Another 1 lists $0; 9 have no known price. All fields: $3,350.

Subfields of Neuroscience (8)

20 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Neurology ranking, 2017

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2016. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2014–2016, the window the 2017 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2014–2016 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2008 to 2017.

Compare
1Journal of NeuroinflammationOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
2.51Q16.36 0.37 up from 2016757100%$4,090
2GliaWiley · United States
2.25Q16.37 0.39 up from 201646551%$5,450
3Tissue BarriersTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.94Q15.36 0.76 up from 201684100%—
4Brain stimulationOAElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.58Q14.34 0.12 up from 201660591%$4,430
5Neural PlasticityOAHindawi Publishing Corporation · United Kingdom
1.54Q13.78 0.39 up from 2016564100%$2,830
6Journal of Neuroimmune PharmacologySpringer Science+Business Media · United States
1.37Q23.75 0.40 up from 201619560%$4,790
7NeuroMolecular MedicineSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
1.23Q23.10 0.36 down from 201614628%$4,990
1.21Q22.67 0.66 down from 201621335%$4,150
9NeuroImmunoModulationOAKarger Publishers · Switzerland
1.13Q21.58 1.79 down from 201612218%—
10Journal of Vestibular ResearchIOS Press · United States
1.07Q23.67 1.49 up from 20168224%$3,900
11Neurophysiologie CliniqueElsevier BV · France
0.83Q31.88 0.11 up from 20161595%$2,760
12Acta Neurobiologiae ExperimentalisOANencki Institute of Experimental Biology · Poland
0.66Q31.89 0.44 up from 2016108100%—
0.41Q31.07 0.37 up from 2016195100%—
14Journal of Medical Imaging and Health InformaticsAmerican Scientific Publishers · United States
0.40Q30.72 0.04 down from 20167212%—
15Audiology ResearchOAMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute · Switzerland
0.25Q30.65 0.19 down from 201638100%$1,689
0.17Q40.22 0.27 down from 201638100%—
17Journal of OtologyOAElsevier BV · China
0.17Q40.43 0.25 up from 201693100%$0 listed
18Journal of the History of the NeurosciencesTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.13Q40.30 0.32 down from 201610313%—
19Neurological BulletinOAUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School
0.02Q40.02no change97100%—
20Int J Cerebrovasc DisPublisher not listed
0.00Q40.01 0.01 up from 20164140%—

Citations made in 2017. Corpus-wide, 77.7% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

9 additional Neurology journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2014–2016, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2017. Publication window: 2014–2016. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
20
Window papers (baseline)
25,523 +5.2% from indicator year 2014
Median OJR
0.95 +6.7% from indicator year 2014
Rising journals (2025)
3

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2014–2016 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals7789991011121314151818192020201919202020192121
Window papers (baseline)7,7708,5269,26910,27311,09112,13113,20514,32915,57217,37018,93020,73421,58422,77724,26725,50826,09525,52325,80726,67928,80131,10433,50135,14636,43238,495
Median OJR0.400.340.480.490.610.800.870.810.881.251.431.240.920.910.891.030.8340.950.8330.6370.710.7160.850.790.7170.636

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.