OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2018

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2018

Pharmacology journal rankings 2018

19 ranked journals · Subfield in Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics

Pharmacology has 19 ranked journals in 2018. The median journal has an OJR of 0.81, below the world average of 1.00, down 0.04 on 2017; Q1 starts at OJR 1.19. The top three are Clinical and Translational Science, Drug Metabolism and Disposition, and Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2018. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2015–2017, the window the 2018 score is computed on.

19
26% of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.81-0.04 vs 2017
This subfieldAll 0.83World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

32%
All fields: 33%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,540
Median positive listed APC: $3,540 among 8 journals. 11 have no known price. All fields: $3,330.

Subfields of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (4)

19 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Pharmacology ranking, 2018

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2017. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2015–2017, the window the 2018 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2015–2017 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2009 to 2018.

Compare
1Clinical and Translational ScienceOAWiley · United Kingdom
1.63Q13.81 1.52 up from 2017236100%$3,630
2Drug Metabolism and DispositionAmerican Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · United States
1.50Q13.48 0.21 down from 201757286%$3,500
3Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & ToxicologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.43Q13.67 0.23 up from 201737125%—
4Pharmacogenetics and GenomicsLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United Kingdom
1.26Q12.92 0.48 up from 201720840%—
5The Pharmacogenomics JournalSpringer Nature · United Kingdom
1.19Q12.93 0.51 down from 201725540%$4,890
6Current Drug MetabolismBentham Science Publishers · Netherlands
1.02Q22.38 0.29 down from 201728310%—
7PharmacogenomicsFuture Medicine · United Kingdom
0.89Q22.25 0.26 down from 201751543%—
0.87Q22.03 0.39 up from 20171613%$3,580
9Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and SciencesOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
0.87Q21.55 0.02 down from 201794100%$2,490
10Biopharmaceutics & Drug DispositionWiley · United Kingdom
0.81Q21.72 0.05 up from 201714422%$3,800
0.77Q31.86 0.46 up from 201719727%$2,690
12XenobioticaTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.71Q31.59 0.03 down from 201745124%—
13Drug Metabolism LettersBentham Science Publishers · Netherlands
0.62Q31.31 0.28 up from 20177352%—
0.57Q31.05no change8429%$2,712
0.26Q30.49 0.11 down from 2017167100%—
16Pharmacology &amp PharmacyOAScientific Research Publishing · United States
0.24Q40.43 0.08 down from 2017144100%—
17International Research Journal of PharmacyMoksha Publishing House · India
0.14Q40.25 0.01 down from 201760180%—
18YAKUGAKU ZASSHIOAPharmaceutical Society of Japan · Japan
0.13Q40.40 0.05 up from 2017610100%—
19Journal of Drug Research and DevelopmentOASCI FORSCHEN · United States
0.08Q40.14 0.11 down from 201732100%—

Citations made in 2018. Corpus-wide, 81.5% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

6 additional Pharmacology journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2015–2017, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2018. Publication window: 2015–2017. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
19
Window papers (baseline)
27,101 -21.6% from indicator year 2015
Median OJR
0.810 -9.6% from indicator year 2015
Rising journals (2025)
0

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2015–2017 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals89111212121414141514141515171820181919181921202016
Window papers (baseline)9,72110,81112,11813,77715,00116,67118,55020,89223,45626,00428,90931,21033,58134,52835,45734,54832,73629,63827,10125,82926,00927,55128,75829,18028,58029,439
Median OJR0.360.381.081.110.940.8091.0521.431.331.541.421.281.191.341.0540.900.910.840.8100.720.770.610.600.590.580.68

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.