Journal rankings · indicator year 2022
Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.
Subfield ranking · 2022
History and Philosophy of Science journal rankings 2022
28 ranked journals · Subfield in Arts and Humanities
History and Philosophy of Science has 28 ranked journals in 2022. The median OJR rose 0.06 on 2021 to 0.98, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.46. The top three are Evolution Education and Outreach, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, and Philosophy of Science.
Ranks and citation indicators: 2022. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.
Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2019–2021, the window the 2022 score is computed on.
The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.
The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.
The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.
Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.
Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.
Subfields of Arts and Humanities (13)
28 ranked journals
Filters
Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest. | OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields. The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list. | Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field. ▲ or ▼ is the change from 2021. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. | Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2019–2021, the window the 2022 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked. | Share of the journal’s 2019–2021 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal. | List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed. | The line is the journal’s OJR from 2013 to 2022. | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1Evolution Education and OutreachOABioMed Central · United Kingdom | 2.20Q1 | 3.13 0.41 up from 2021 | 59 | 100% | $2,390 | ||
2The British Journal for the Philosophy of ScienceOxford University Press · United States | 2.04Q1 | 1.71 0.68 down from 2021 | 172 | 50% | — | ||
3Philosophy of ScienceCambridge University Press · United States | 1.84Q1 | 2.19 0.01 down from 2021 | 252 | 63% | $3,550 | ||
4European Journal for Philosophy of ScienceSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands | 1.72Q1 | 2.40 0.62 up from 2021 | 179 | 74% | $2,190 | ||
5Journal for the History of KnowledgeOAUbiquity Press · United Kingdom | 1.64Q1 | 1.70 0.26 up from 2021 | 30 | 100% | — | ||
6BJHS ThemesOACambridge University Press · United Kingdom | 1.52Q1 | 2.41 1.95 up from 2021 | 42 | 100% | $3,550 | ||
7Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part AElsevier BV · United Kingdom | 1.46Q1 | 2.03 0.40 up from 2021 | 253 | 38% | $2,930 | ||
8Biological TheorySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands | 1.26Q2 | 1.67 0.25 down from 2021 | 77 | 66% | $3,290 | ||
9International Studies in the Philosophy of ScienceRoutledge · United Kingdom | 1.22Q2 | 0.88 0.27 down from 2021 | 54 | 42% | — | ||
10The British Journal for the History of ScienceCambridge University Press · United Kingdom | 1.17Q2 | 1.28 0.53 up from 2021 | 109 | 55% | $3,550 | ||
11Perspectives on ScienceThe MIT Press · United States | 1.13Q2 | 1.29 0.21 up from 2021 | 115 | 40% | — | ||
| 1.08Q2 | 1.58 0.07 down from 2021 | 104 | — | $2,420 | |||
13Journal for General Philosophy of ScienceSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands | 1.02Q2 | 1.42 0.46 up from 2021 | 128 | 58% | $3,290 | ||
14OsirisUniversity of Chicago Press · United States | 1.00Q2 | 1.67 1.23 up from 2021 | 50 | 33% | — | ||
15History & Philosophy of the Life SciencesSpringer Nature · Switzerland | 0.96Q3 | 1.88 0.34 down from 2021 | 209 | 60% | $2,190 | ||
16Interdisciplinary Science ReviewsTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom | 0.95Q3 | 1.77 0.51 up from 2021 | 106 | 41% | $4,150 | ||
17CentaurusWiley · Belgium | 0.69Q3 | 1.02 1.17 down from 2021 | 127 | 49% | $2,500 | ||
18Journal of the History of BiologySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands | 0.69Q3 | 0.80 0.69 down from 2021 | 86 | 44% | $3,090 | ||
19ConfigurationsJohns Hopkins University Press · United States | 0.65Q3 | 0.15 0.57 down from 2021 | 89 | 12% | — | ||
20Foundations of ScienceSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands | 0.64Q3 | 0.90 0.49 down from 2021 | 230 | 62% | $2,390 | ||
21IsisUniversity of Chicago Press · United States | 0.60Q3 | 0.76 0.03 down from 2021 | 208 | 9% | — | ||
22Bulletin of the history of medicineJohns Hopkins University Press · United States | 0.60Q4 | 0.57 0.06 up from 2021 | 244 | 7% | — | ||
23Technology and CultureJohns Hopkins University Press · United States | 0.52Q4 | 0.39 0.20 down from 2021 | 478 | 5% | — | ||
24Environment and HistoryUnited Kingdom | 0.48Q4 | 0.44 0.19 down from 2021 | 122 | 33% | — | ||
25THEORIA An International Journal for Theory History and Foundations of ScienceOAUniversity of the Basque Country · Spain | 0.45Q4 | 0.83 0.18 up from 2021 | 68 | 100% | — | ||
26Social History of MedicineOxford University Press · United Kingdom | 0.33Q4 | 0.13 0.34 down from 2021 | 365 | 27% | $3,864 | ||
27Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied SciencesOxford University Press · United Kingdom | 0.32Q4 | 0.25 0.08 up from 2021 | 157 | 7% | $4,448 | ||
28Filozoficzne Aspekty GenezyOAPoland | 0.06Q4 | 0.13 0.13 up from 2021 | 143 | 100% | — |
Subfields of Arts and Humanities, with History and Philosophy of Science highlighted.
- Language and Linguistics160
- Philosophy94
- Literature and Literary Theory73
- Archeology72
- Music33
- History and Philosophy of Science28
- Conservation23
- Museology23
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts22
- History6
- Classics1
- General Arts and Humanities0
- Religious studies0
Journals
Citations made in 2022. Corpus-wide, 89.5% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.
2 additional History and Philosophy of Science journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2019–2021, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.
At a glance
Indicator year: 2022. Publication window: 2019–2021. How these summaries are calculated
- Ranked journals
- 28
- Window papers (baseline)
- 31,207 +2.3% from indicator year 2019
- Median OJR
- 0.98327 -8.8% from indicator year 2019
- Rising journals (2025)
- 0
Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2019–2021 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.
| Measure | Year series | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranked journals | 20 | 20 | 20 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 24 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 27 | 27 | 29 | 28 | 27 | 28 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 28 | 28 | 27 | 27 | |
| Window papers (baseline) | 13,164 | 14,084 | 14,938 | 15,820 | 16,468 | 17,489 | 18,503 | 19,361 | 20,374 | 21,585 | 23,214 | 24,241 | 24,944 | 25,411 | 26,253 | 27,298 | 28,143 | 29,168 | 29,718 | 30,514 | 31,382 | 31,648 | 31,207 | 29,590 | 28,275 | 26,958 | |
| Median OJR | 0.57 | 0.47 | 0.820 | 0.65 | 0.43 | 0.58 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 1.06 | 0.824 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.984 | 0.94 | 0.91 | 0.83 | 1.11 | 1.08 | 0.98329 | 0.92 | 0.98327 | 0.981 | 0.84 | 0.73 |
How to read these rankings
- OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
- A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
- Quartiles
- Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
- Impact factor (2-year)
- Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
- Rank ranges
- Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.