OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2025

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2025

History and Philosophy of Science journal rankings 2025

27 ranked journals · Subfield in Arts and Humanities

History and Philosophy of Science has 27 ranked journals in 2025. The median OJR fell 0.11 on 2024 to 0.73, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.06. No journal’s likely rank range stays within the top 3, so the intro names none.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2025. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2022–2024, the window the 2025 score is computed on.

27
5% of Arts and Humanities
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.73-0.11 vs 2024
This subfieldAll 0.78World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

19%
All fields: 38%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,290
Median positive listed APC: $3,290 among 15 journals. 12 have no known price. All fields: $3,200.

Subfields of Arts and Humanities (13)

27 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
History and Philosophy of Science ranking, 2025

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

The small range under it is the likely rank range: in 95% of 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers, it ranked inside that range. Journals whose ranges overlap are not clearly different.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2024. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2022–2024, the window the 2025 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2022–2024 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2016 to 2025.

A label compares the 2022→2025 change with the median change of the journal’s field or domain. Rising needs a relative change of +10% or more that is at least 2 standard errors above zero; Falling needs -9.1% or less (rounded), at least 2 standard errors below zero. Sorting uses that relative change.

Compare
Rank 1; likely between #1 and #5 of 27European Journal for Philosophy of ScienceSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.67Q12.67 0.25 up from 202419282%$2,190
Rank 2; likely between #1 and #8 of 27Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part AElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.37Q11.96 0.34 down from 202428057%$2,930
Rank 3; likely between #1 and #12 of 27Evolution Education and OutreachOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
1.30Q11.14 0.77 down from 202455100%$2,390
Rank 4; likely between #2 and #9 of 27Philosophy of ScienceCambridge University Press · United States
1.25Q12.05 0.51 up from 202434889%$3,550
Rank 5; likely between #1 and #19 of 27ConfigurationsJohns Hopkins University Press · United States
1.24Q10.54 0.16 up from 2024817%—
Rank 6; likely between #2 and #13 of 27Biological TheorySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.08Q12.21 0.23 up from 20248872%$3,290
Rank 7; likely between #2 and #15 of 27Interdisciplinary Science ReviewsTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
1.06Q11.15 0.23 down from 202411088%$4,150
Rank 8; likely between #4 and #14 of 27The British Journal for the Philosophy of ScienceOxford University Press · United States
0.98Q21.68 0.23 up from 202413131%—Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 9; likely between #3 and #16 of 27Perspectives on ScienceThe MIT Press · United States
0.98Q21.13 0.20 up from 20248819%—
Rank 10; likely between #1 and #20 of 27International Studies in the Philosophy of ScienceRoutledge · United Kingdom
0.96Q20.89 1.47 down from 20245937%—
Rank 11; likely between #5 and #17 of 27Foundations of ScienceSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.79Q21.84 0.54 up from 202412659%$2,390
Rank 12; likely between #4 and #19 of 27Journal for General Philosophy of ScienceSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.78Q20.78 0.41 down from 20249161%$3,290
Rank 13; likely between #7 and #16 of 27IsisUniversity of Chicago Press · United States
0.78Q20.62 0.24 down from 202424710%—
Rank 14; likely between #8 and #17 of 27History & Philosophy of the Life SciencesSpringer Nature · Switzerland
0.73Q21.03 0.03 down from 202415462%$2,190
Rank 15; likely between #4 and #21 of 27OsirisUniversity of Chicago Press · United States
0.65Q30.76 0.01 down from 20244722%—
Rank 16; likely between #10 and #20 of 27Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied SciencesOxford University Press · United Kingdom
0.56Q30.45 0.26 up from 202416118%$4,448
Rank 17; likely between #7 and #22 of 27BJHS ThemesOACambridge University Press · United Kingdom
0.55Q30.91 0.05 up from 202443100%$3,550
Rank 18; likely between #12 and #20 of 27Journal of the History of BiologySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.54Q30.61 0.02 up from 20249145%$3,090
Rank 19; likely between #11 and #21 of 27The British Journal for the History of ScienceCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
0.51Q30.56 1.04 down from 202411586%$3,550
Rank 20; likely between #14 and #26 of 27Journal for the History of KnowledgeOAUbiquity Press · United Kingdom
0.35Q30.17 0.11 down from 202447100%—
Rank 21; likely between #18 and #25 of 27CentaurusWiley · Belgium
0.30Q30.14 0.21 down from 202411387%$2,500Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 22; likely between #18 and #27 of 27THEORIA An International Journal for Theory History and Foundations of ScienceOAUniversity of the Basque Country · Spain
0.27Q40.56 0.01 up from 202457100%—
Rank 23; likely between #20 and #26 of 27Social History of MedicineOxford University Press · United Kingdom
0.24Q40.16 0.05 down from 202424436%$3,864
Rank 24; likely between #20 and #27 of 27Environment and HistoryUnited Kingdom
0.23Q40.21 0.06 down from 202415013%—Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 25; likely between #20 and #27 of 27Bulletin of the history of medicineJohns Hopkins University Press · United States
0.22Q40.14 0.27 down from 202415813%—Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 26; likely between #22 and #27 of 27Technology and CultureJohns Hopkins University Press · United States
0.20Q40.11 0.05 down from 20246349%—Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 27; likely between #23 and #27 of 27Filozoficzne Aspekty GenezyOAPoland
0.11Q40.10 0.04 up from 202468100%—

The endpoints below each rank show its likely range. How rank ranges are calculated

Citations made in 2025. Corpus-wide, 84.3% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

3 additional History and Philosophy of Science journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2022–2024, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2025. Publication window: 2022–2024. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
27
Window papers (baseline)
26,958 -13.6% from indicator year 2022
Median OJR
0.73 -26.0% from indicator year 2022
Rising journals (2025)
0

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2022–2024 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals2020202121212323232426262627272928272828272728282727
Window papers (baseline)13,16414,08414,93815,82016,46817,48918,50319,36120,37421,58523,21424,24124,94425,41126,25327,29828,14329,16829,71830,51431,38231,64831,20729,59028,27526,958
Median OJR0.570.470.8200.650.430.580.770.781.060.8240.720.630.800.710.9840.940.910.831.111.080.983290.920.983270.9810.840.73

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.