OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2025

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2025

Biophysics journal rankings 2025

10 ranked journals · Subfield in Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Biophysics has 10 ranked journals in 2025. The median journal has an OJR of 0.53, below the world average of 1.00, up 0.01 on 2024; Q1 starts at OJR 0.62. The two highest-scoring journals with stable ranks are npj Imaging and Chemical & Biomedical Imaging: each is likely ranked within the top 3.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2025. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2022–2024, the window the 2025 score is computed on.

10
<1% of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.53
This subfieldAll 0.78World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

30%
All fields: 38%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,370
Median positive listed APC: $3,370 among 8 journals. Another 1 lists $0; 1 has no known price. All fields: $3,200.

Subfields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (14)

10 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Biophysics ranking, 2025

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

The small range under it is the likely rank range: in 95% of 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers, it ranked inside that range. Journals whose ranges overlap are not clearly different.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2024. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2022–2024, the window the 2025 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2022–2024 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2016 to 2025.

A label compares the 2022→2025 change with the median change of the journal’s field or domain. Rising needs a relative change of +10% or more that is at least 2 standard errors above zero; Falling needs -9.1% or less (rounded), at least 2 standard errors below zero. Sorting uses that relative change.

Compare
Rank 1; likely between #1 and #2 of 10npj ImagingOASpringer Science+Business Media
2.17Q17.26 2.93 up from 202454100%$2,790
Rank 2; likely between #1 and #2 of 10Chemical & Biomedical ImagingOAAmerican Chemical Society
1.52Q16.90 0.91 up from 2024160100%$0 listed
Rank 3; likely between #3 and #5 of 10Journal of Raman SpectroscopyWiley · United Kingdom
0.62Q12.26 0.33 up from 202443554%$4,020
Rank 4; likely between #3 and #7 of 10Applied SpectroscopySAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
0.57Q22.05 0.21 down from 202442828%$4,400Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 5; likely between #3 and #7 of 10Journal of MicroscopyWiley · United Kingdom
0.55Q22.08 0.08 down from 202425867%$4,760
Rank 6; likely between #3 and #9 of 10Biological ImagingCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
0.51Q31.68 0.37 up from 202448—$3,450
Rank 7; likely between #4 and #9 of 10Electromagnetic Biology and MedicineTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.47Q31.67 0.04 down from 2024809%—
Rank 8; likely between #5 and #9 of 10BioelectromagneticsWiley · United States
0.44Q31.85 0.49 up from 20249274%$3,290
Rank 9; likely between #8 and #10 of 10Applied Magnetic ResonanceSpringer Science+Business Media · Austria
0.33Q41.29 0.22 up from 202429230%$3,090
Rank 10; likely between #7 and #10 of 10Applied Spectroscopy PracticaOASAGE Publishing
0.29Q40.97 0.67 up from 202430100%$1,800

The endpoints below each rank show its likely range. How rank ranges are calculated

Citations made in 2025. Corpus-wide, 84.3% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

4 additional Biophysics journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2022–2024, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2025. Publication window: 2022–2024. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
10
Window papers (baseline)
15,284 -0.2% from indicator year 2022
Median OJR
0.53 -23.5% from indicator year 2022
Rising journals (2025)
0

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2022–2024 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals666666666666667877776877910
Window papers (baseline)5,2845,4335,5885,8046,0526,5397,0787,7878,4809,2159,86410,55711,08011,61912,15012,65913,21013,60613,97014,25214,53814,90115,31015,31115,00215,284
Median OJR0.720.610.510.6570.880.9970.981.040.9470.9500.990.8330.940.930.860.910.8290.6930.730.750.700.640.6910.6610.520.53

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.