Journal rankings · indicator year 2025
Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.
Subfield ranking · 2025
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics journal rankings 2025
145 ranked journals · Subfield in Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics has 145 ranked journals in 2025. The median OJR fell 0.05 on 2024 to 0.45, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 0.86. The highest-scoring journal with a stable rank is Ecology Letters: its likely rank is within the top 3.
Ranks and citation indicators: 2025. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.
Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2022–2024, the window the 2025 score is computed on.
The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.
The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.
The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.
Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.
Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.
Subfields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences (11)
145 ranked journals
Filters
Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest. The small range under it is the likely rank range: in 95% of 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers, it ranked inside that range. Journals whose ranges overlap are not clearly different. | OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields. The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list. | Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field. ▲ or ▼ is the change from 2024. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. | Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2022–2024, the window the 2025 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked. | Share of the journal’s 2022–2024 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal. | List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed. | The line is the journal’s OJR from 2016 to 2025. A label compares the 2022→2025 change with the median change of the journal’s field or domain. Rising needs a relative change of +10% or more that is at least 2 standard errors above zero; Falling needs -9.1% or less (rounded), at least 2 standard errors below zero. Sorting uses that relative change. | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rank 1; likely between #1 and #2 of 145Ecology LettersWiley · United Kingdom | 3.63Q1 | 7.38 1.14 down from 2024 | 595 | 77% | $5,300 | ||
Rank 2; likely between #1 and #11 of 145CladisticsWiley · United States | 2.81Q1 | 8.05 1.56 up from 2024 | 87 | 56% | $3,960 | ||
Rank 3; likely between #2 and #6 of 145International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and ManagementOAEmerald Publishing Limited · United Kingdom | 2.46Q1 | 4.68 0.61 down from 2024 | 107 | 100% | $1,839 | ||
Rank 4; likely between #2 and #6 of 145Functional EcologyOAWiley · United Kingdom | 2.35Q1 | 5.46 0.11 up from 2024 | 685 | 100% | $3,000 | Rising vs field, 2022–25 | |
Rank 5; likely between #2 and #10 of 145Frontiers in Bee ScienceOAFrontiers Media | 2.25Q1 | 4.17 0.20 down from 2024 | 36 | 100% | $2,353 | ||
Rank 6; likely between #4 and #9 of 145Systematic EntomologyWiley · United Kingdom | 1.92Q1 | 4.16 0.91 down from 2024 | 124 | 66% | $4,520 | ||
Rank 7; likely between #2 and #19 of 145The Botanical ReviewSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands | 1.89Q1 | 5.58 2.04 up from 2024 | 38 | 36% | $3,790 | ||
Rank 8; likely between #5 and #13 of 145Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global ChangeSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands | 1.78Q1 | 5.21 1.80 up from 2024 | 199 | 39% | $3,490 | ||
Rank 9; likely between #6 and #12 of 145Basic and Applied EcologyOAElsevier BV · Germany | 1.73Q1 | 4.24 0.41 up from 2024 | 238 | 100% | $1,800 | ||
Rank 10; likely between #7 and #15 of 145Insect Conservation and DiversityWiley · United Kingdom | 1.60Q1 | 3.40 0.10 down from 2024 | 220 | 78% | $4,750 | ||
Rank 11; likely between #9 and #13 of 145Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesRoyal Society · United Kingdom | 1.52Q1 | 3.61 0.23 down from 2024 | 1,661 | 92% | — | Falling vs field, 2022–25 | |
Rank 12; likely between #8 and #22 of 145Journal of Systematics and EvolutionWiley · China | 1.41Q1 | 3.21 0.23 up from 2024 | 214 | 46% | $3,000 | ||
Rank 13; likely between #7 and #28 of 145Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and SystematicsElsevier BV · Germany | 1.37Q1 | 2.47 0.66 down from 2024 | 92 | 33% | $3,570 | ||
Rank 14; likely between #11 and #19 of 145OikosWiley · United Kingdom | 1.32Q1 | 2.98 0.27 down from 2024 | 496 | 76% | $3,640 | ||
Rank 15; likely between #12 and #20 of 145Biology LettersOARoyal Society · United Kingdom | 1.31Q1 | 2.85 0.48 down from 2024 | 534 | 92% | — | ||
Rank 16; likely between #12 and #19 of 145Molecular Phylogenetics and EvolutionElsevier BV · United States | 1.31Q1 | 3.83 0.10 up from 2024 | 597 | 54% | $3,830 | ||
Rank 17; likely between #10 and #26 of 145Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and SystematicsAnnual Reviews · United States | 1.30Q1 | 13.23 0.53 down from 2024 | 63 | 96% | — | ||
Rank 18; likely between #13 and #28 of 145Behavioral EcologyOxford University Press · United Kingdom | 1.17Q1 | 2.13 0.17 up from 2024 | 338 | 67% | $3,906 | ||
Rank 19; likely between #17 and #27 of 145Animal BehaviourElsevier BV · United Kingdom | 1.14Q1 | 2.16 0.02 down from 2024 | 731 | 67% | $2,740 | ||
Rank 20; likely between #10 and #42 of 145Alpine BotanySpringer Science+Business Media · Switzerland | 1.12Q1 | 3.67 1.24 up from 2024 | 45 | 78% | $4,390 | ||
Rank 21; likely between #14 and #33 of 145Insect Systematics and DiversityOxford University Press | 1.12Q1 | 2.09 0.92 down from 2024 | 102 | 52% | $4,328 | ||
Rank 22; likely between #15 and #32 of 145The American NaturalistUniversity of Chicago Press · United States | 1.10Q1 | 2.09 0.46 down from 2024 | 427 | 23% | — | Falling vs field, 2022–25 | |
Rank 23; likely between #18 and #30 of 145American Journal of BotanyWiley · United States | 1.09Q1 | 2.73 0.24 up from 2024 | 464 | 61% | $2,660 | ||
Rank 24; likely between #19 and #30 of 145EvolutionOxford University Press · United States | 1.07Q1 | 2.58 0.35 up from 2024 | 682 | 69% | $3,214 | ||
Rank 25; likely between #14 and #36 of 145Frontiers in ZoologyOABioMed Central · United Kingdom | 1.06Q1 | 2.78 0.13 down from 2024 | 101 | 100% | $3,090 | ||
Rank 26; likely between #18 and #35 of 145ApidologieSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany | 1.03Q1 | 1.80 0.70 down from 2024 | 211 | 62% | $2,990 | ||
Rank 27; likely between #18 and #35 of 145Journal of Evolutionary BiologyOxford University Press · Switzerland | 1.02Q1 | 2.31 0.03 down from 2024 | 429 | 73% | $3,123 | ||
Rank 28; likely between #20 and #35 of 145Journal of Insect ConservationSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands | 1.01Q1 | 2.16 0.05 down from 2024 | 267 | 55% | $3,990 | ||
Rank 29; likely between #14 and #46 of 145Zoological LettersOABioMed Central · United Kingdom | 1.00Q1 | 2.79 0.43 up from 2024 | 57 | 100% | $2,090 | ||
Rank 30; likely between #14 and #49 of 145Journal of Pollination EcologyOAEnviroquest Ltd. · Canada | 0.97Q1 | 1.89 0.60 up from 2024 | 65 | 100% | — | ||
Rank 31; likely between #13 and #46 of 145Die NaturwissenschaftenSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany | 0.96Q1 | 1.72 0.59 down from 2024 | 167 | 31% | $3,790 | ||
Rank 32; likely between #25 and #36 of 145Behavioral Ecology and SociobiologySpringer Science+Business Media · Germany | 0.94Q1 | 2.03 0.06 down from 2024 | 428 | 56% | $3,590 | ||
Rank 33; likely between #23 and #39 of 145Animal CognitionOASpringer Science+Business Media · Germany | 0.93Q1 | 2.56 0.13 down from 2024 | 318 | 100% | $3,390 | ||
Rank 34; likely between #17 and #53 of 145Journal of Hymenoptera ResearchOAPensoft Publishers · Bulgaria | 0.88Q1 | 1.50 0.26 down from 2024 | 199 | 100% | $754 | ||
Rank 35; likely between #27 and #41 of 145Ecological EntomologyWiley · United Kingdom | 0.88Q1 | 1.98 0.28 up from 2024 | 283 | 72% | $4,410 | ||
Rank 36; likely between #29 and #40 of 145FloraElsevier BV · Germany | 0.86Q1 | 2.13 0.18 up from 2024 | 402 | 20% | $2,900 | ||
Rank 37; likely between #26 and #44 of 145Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyOxford University Press · United Kingdom | 0.86Q1 | 2.09 0.21 up from 2024 | 242 | 30% | $3,541 | ||
Rank 38; likely between #31 and #44 of 145BiotropicaWiley · United States | 0.81Q2 | 1.81 0.07 up from 2024 | 351 | 62% | $2,630 | ||
Rank 39; likely between #32 and #48 of 145Zoologica ScriptaWiley · Sweden | 0.78Q2 | 1.97 0.18 down from 2024 | 160 | 58% | $4,100 | ||
Rank 40; likely between #36 and #49 of 145Biological Journal of the Linnean SocietyOxford University Press · United Kingdom | 0.74Q2 | 1.62 0.02 down from 2024 | 443 | 31% | $3,541 | ||
Rank 41; likely between #32 and #57 of 145Arthropod Systematics & PhylogenyOAPensoft Publishers · Germany | 0.74Q2 | 1.65 0.08 up from 2024 | 110 | 100% | — | ||
Rank 42; likely between #34 and #52 of 145Evolutionary EcologySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands | 0.73Q2 | 1.69 0.47 down from 2024 | 169 | 50% | $2,590 | ||
Rank 43; likely between #35 and #53 of 145Behavioural ProcessesElsevier BV · Netherlands | 0.73Q2 | 1.68 0.08 up from 2024 | 341 | 34% | $3,550 | Rising vs field, 2022–25 | |
Rank 44; likely between #30 and #75 of 145Insect Systematics & EvolutionBrill · Netherlands | 0.68Q2 | 1.21 0.36 down from 2024 | 45 | 0% | — | ||
Rank 45; likely between #32 and #74 of 145APN Science BulletinOAPublisher not listed | 0.68Q2 | 1.52 0.24 down from 2024 | 50 | 100% | — | ||
Rank 46; likely between #39 and #59 of 145Organisms Diversity & EvolutionSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany | 0.67Q2 | 1.50 0.52 down from 2024 | 128 | 64% | $3,690 | ||
Rank 47; likely between #42 and #56 of 145Review of Palaeobotany and PalynologyElsevier BV · Netherlands | 0.66Q2 | 1.64 0.19 down from 2024 | 387 | 30% | $3,260 | ||
Rank 48; likely between #42 and #63 of 145EthologyWiley · Germany | 0.62Q2 | 1.37 0.03 down from 2024 | 214 | 66% | $4,650 | ||
Rank 49; likely between #41 and #66 of 145New MeditOAItaly | 0.62Q2 | 1.06 0.09 down from 2024 | 115 | 100% | — | ||
Rank 50; likely between #40 and #65 of 145International Journal of Plant SciencesUniversity of Chicago Press · United States | 0.62Q2 | 1.27 0.10 up from 2024 | 159 | 22% | — | Falling vs field, 2022–25 |
5 Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics journals are labelled rising: their OJR moved up between 2022 and 2025 clearly faster than the median journal of their field or domain.
A journal is rising when its OJR grew from 2022 to 2025 faster than the median journal of its field (or domain, when the field is small), by two tests: the relative change is +10% or more, and it is at least 2 standard errors above zero. So the range of the change at 2 standard errors stays above zero, though not necessarily above +10%.
The bar is that range on a ratio scale; the shaded band, -9.1% to +10%, holds changes too small for a label. The list is ordered by the low end of the range, so the surest rises come first.
- 1Systematic and Applied AcarologySystematic & Applied Acarology Society · United Kingdom+45% vs groupOJR 0.25 → 0.31range +17% to +80%
- 2Functional EcologyOAWiley · United Kingdom+18% vs groupOJR 2.27 → 2.35range +1.8% to +36%
- 3Nordic Journal of BotanyWiley · Sweden+38% vs groupOJR 0.27 → 0.33range +1.4% to +88%
- 4Journal of Natural HistoryTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom+26% vs groupOJR 0.29 → 0.32range +0.8% to +58%
- 5Behavioural ProcessesElsevier BV · Netherlands+25% vs groupOJR 0.66 → 0.73range +0.6% to +55%
No-label zone, -9.1% to +10%Group median changeBar scale -48% to +94% (ratio scale)
8 Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics journals are labelled falling: their OJR moved between 2022 and 2025 clearly behind the median journal of their field or domain.
A journal is falling when its OJR changed from 2022 to 2025 by less than the median journal of its field (or domain, when the field is small), by two tests: the relative change is -9.1% or less (rounded), and it is at least 2 standard errors below zero. So the range of the change at 2 standard errors stays below zero, though not necessarily below -9.1%.
The bar is that range on a ratio scale; the shaded band, -9.1% to +10%, holds changes too small for a label. The list is ordered by the high end of the range, so the surest falls come first.
- 1The Coleopterists BulletinThe Coleopterists Society · United States-43% vs groupOJR 0.29 → 0.14range -59% to -22%
- 2Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesRoyal Society · United Kingdom-17% vs groupOJR 2.10 → 1.52range -24% to -9.9%
- 3BrittoniaSpringer Science+Business Media · United States-38% vs groupOJR 0.38 → 0.21range -58% to -8.2%
- 4International Journal of Plant SciencesUniversity of Chicago Press · United States-28% vs groupOJR 0.97 → 0.62range -46% to -4.0%
- 5The American NaturalistUniversity of Chicago Press · United States-23% vs groupOJR 1.62 → 1.10range -39% to -2.6%
- 6Austral EntomologyWiley · United Kingdom-31% vs groupOJR 0.76 → 0.46range -51% to -2.5%
- 7American EntomologistOxford University Press · United States-55% vs groupOJR 0.41 → 0.16range -80% to -2.2%
- 8TaxonWiley · United States-27% vs groupOJR 0.49 → 0.31range -47% to 0.0%
No-label zone, -9.1% to +10%Group median changeBar scale -81% to +431% (ratio scale)
Subfields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics highlighted.
- Plant Science551
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics145
- Food Science143
- Animal Science and Zoology58
- Insect Science49
- Agronomy and Crop Science42
- Soil Science39
- Aquatic Science35
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences33
- Forestry1
- Horticulture0
Journals
The endpoints below each rank show its likely range. How rank ranges are calculated
Citations made in 2025. Corpus-wide, 84.3% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.
20 additional Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2022–2024, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.
At a glance
Indicator year: 2025. Publication window: 2022–2024. How these summaries are calculated
- Ranked journals
- 145
- Window papers (baseline)
- 73,578 -0.7% from indicator year 2022
- Median OJR
- 0.45 -5.1% from indicator year 2022
- Rising journals (2025)
- 5
Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2022–2024 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.
| Measure | Year series | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranked journals | 95 | 101 | 105 | 109 | 106 | 101 | 103 | 106 | 103 | 113 | 120 | 128 | 130 | 137 | 140 | 144 | 144 | 145 | 148 | 150 | 152 | 147 | 150 | 151 | 147 | 145 | |
| Window papers (baseline) | 29,541 | 33,040 | 34,931 | 36,852 | 36,959 | 39,032 | 41,685 | 45,017 | 48,550 | 53,297 | 59,000 | 64,284 | 66,440 | 66,489 | 67,535 | 70,051 | 72,548 | 73,555 | 73,117 | 72,516 | 71,728 | 72,753 | 74,109 | 73,873 | 72,350 | 73,578 | |
| Median OJR | 0.54 | 0.598 | 0.56 | 0.600 | 0.614 | 0.62 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.743 | 0.688 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.705 | 0.737 | 0.686 | 0.67 | 0.699 | 0.608 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.48 | 0.503 | 0.505 | 0.45 |
How to read these rankings
- OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
- A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
- Quartiles
- Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
- Impact factor (2-year)
- Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
- Rank ranges
- Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.