OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2025

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2025

Geophysics journal rankings 2025

144 ranked journals · Subfield in Earth and Planetary Sciences

Geophysics has 144 ranked journals in 2025. The median journal has an OJR of 0.75, below the world average of 1.00, unchanged on 2024; Q1 starts at OJR 1.06. The three highest-scoring journals with stable ranks are Earth-Science Reviews, Geoscience Frontiers, and Gondwana Research: each is likely ranked within the top 3.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2025. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2022–2024, the window the 2025 score is computed on.

144
37% of Earth and Planetary Sciences
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.75
This subfieldAll 0.78World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

38%
All fields: 38%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,290
Median positive listed APC: $3,290 among 81 journals. Another 1 lists $0; 62 have no known price. All fields: $3,200.

Subfields of Earth and Planetary Sciences (8)

144 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Geophysics ranking, 2025

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

The small range under it is the likely rank range: in 95% of 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers, it ranked inside that range. Journals whose ranges overlap are not clearly different.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2024. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2022–2024, the window the 2025 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2022–2024 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2016 to 2025.

A label compares the 2022→2025 change with the median change of the journal’s field or domain. Rising needs a relative change of +10% or more that is at least 2 standard errors above zero; Falling needs -9.1% or less (rounded), at least 2 standard errors below zero. Sorting uses that relative change.

Compare
Rank 1; likely between #1 and #2 of 144Earth-Science ReviewsElsevier BV · Netherlands
4.46Q112.01 1.03 up from 202482140%$5,120
Rank 2; likely between #1 and #3 of 144Geoscience FrontiersElsevier BV · Netherlands
4.45Q113.83 2.01 up from 202443199%$3,000Rising vs field, 2022–25
Rank 3; likely between #2 and #3 of 144Gondwana ResearchElsevier BV · Japan
3.64Q19.39 1.24 down from 202464625%$3,700Rising vs field, 2022–25
Rank 4; likely between #4 and #5 of 144Surveys in GeophysicsSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
2.73Q16.65 1.33 down from 202416756%$4,290
Rank 5; likely between #5 and #8 of 144Earth and Planetary Science LettersElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.99Q15.04 0.63 down from 20241,23960%$4,670Rising vs field, 2022–25
Rank 6; likely between #5 and #10 of 144Science China Earth SciencesSpringer Science+Business Media · China
1.95Q15.05 0.69 down from 20245954%$3,990
Rank 7; likely between #5 and #18 of 144The Seismic RecordOAUnited States
1.94Q15.52 0.16 down from 202498100%—
Rank 8; likely between #5 and #12 of 144Mineralium DepositaSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.88Q14.53 0.37 down from 202424047%$3,890
Rank 9; likely between #6 and #12 of 144GeologyGeological Society of America · United States
1.81Q14.54 0.03 up from 202468753%—
Rank 10; likely between #5 and #17 of 144Economic GeologyUnited States
1.75Q14.23 0.14 up from 202425841%—
Rank 11; likely between #9 and #19 of 144Computers & GeosciencesElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.59Q14.42 0.77 down from 202449137%$4,010
Rank 12; likely between #10 and #17 of 144Journal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthWiley · United States
1.56Q14.06 0.64 down from 20241,61673%$4,070
Rank 13; likely between #9 and #21 of 144Geosystems and GeoenvironmentOAElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.56Q15.03 0.57 up from 2024237100%$2,000
Rank 14; likely between #11 and #18 of 144TectonicsWiley · United States
1.55Q13.78 0.16 down from 202441560%$4,070Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 15; likely between #5 and #30 of 144Earthquake research advancesOAPublisher not listed
1.55Q13.49 0.87 down from 2024113100%$800
Rank 16; likely between #9 and #29 of 144Geoscience LettersOASpringer Nature · Germany
1.46Q13.77 0.50 down from 2024160100%$1,390
Rank 17; likely between #12 and #21 of 144Journal of PetrologyOxford University Press · United Kingdom
1.46Q13.63 0.05 down from 202432456%$4,353
Rank 18; likely between #14 and #20 of 144Geochimica et Cosmochimica ActaElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.44Q14.97 0.35 down from 20241,16350%$4,090
Rank 19; likely between #6 and #46 of 144SeismicaOAPublisher not listed
1.41Q13.68 1.57 down from 2024125100%—
Rank 20; likely between #14 and #28 of 144Geochemical Perspectives LettersOAPublisher not listed
1.34Q14.08 0.08 up from 2024132100%—
Rank 21; likely between #10 and #47 of 144American Journal of ScienceYale University · United States
1.31Q13.80 1.44 up from 202455100%—
Rank 22; likely between #12 and #50 of 144Artificial Intelligence in GeosciencesOAElsevier BV · China
1.26Q14.04 0.19 up from 202468100%$700
Rank 23; likely between #17 and #42 of 144Progress in Earth and Planetary ScienceOASpringer Nature · Germany
1.23Q13.73 0.52 up from 2024204100%$1,870
Rank 24; likely between #19 and #35 of 144Contributions to Mineralogy and PetrologySpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.22Q13.00 0.22 down from 202431567%$3,990
Rank 25; likely between #18 and #44 of 144Journal of Metamorphic GeologyWiley · United Kingdom
1.21Q13.19 0.02 up from 202412168%$5,000
Rank 26; likely between #21 and #33 of 144Ore Geology ReviewsOAElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.19Q14.18 0.56 up from 20241,484100%$3,310Rising vs field, 2022–25
Rank 27; likely between #21 and #35 of 144Geological Society of America BulletinGeological Society of America · United States
1.19Q12.86 0.08 down from 202467711%—Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 28; likely between #21 and #35 of 144Journal of Earth ScienceSpringer Science+Business Media · China
1.19Q13.99 0.34 down from 202448026%$3,090
Rank 29; likely between #22 and #35 of 144Geochemistry Geophysics GeosystemsOAWiley · United States
1.16Q13.37 0.08 down from 2024781100%$3,000
Rank 30; likely between #23 and #35 of 144Chemical GeologyElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.16Q13.64 0.22 down from 20241,23345%$3,550
Rank 31; likely between #20 and #51 of 144Geodesy and GeodynamicsOAKeAi · Netherlands
1.11Q12.13 0.31 down from 2024191100%$0 listed
Rank 32; likely between #26 and #41 of 144GeophysicsSociety of Exploration Geophysicists · United States
1.11Q13.26 0.09 down from 20241,1295%—
Rank 33; likely between #21 and #50 of 144Journal of the Geological SocietyGeological Society of London · United Kingdom
1.10Q12.64 0.18 down from 202431736%—
Rank 34; likely between #29 and #43 of 144Geophysical Journal InternationalOAOxford University Press · United Kingdom
1.08Q13.04 0.03 up from 20241,444100%$3,416
Rank 35; likely between #23 and #53 of 144GeochemistryElsevier BV · Germany
1.07Q13.02 0.23 up from 202423824%$3,440
Rank 36; likely between #25 and #51 of 144Basin ResearchWiley · United Kingdom
1.06Q12.69 0.14 down from 202424165%$4,310Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 37; likely between #31 and #46 of 144Precambrian ResearchElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.05Q22.77 0.60 down from 202474929%$3,600
Rank 38; likely between #24 and #55 of 144Bulletin of VolcanologySpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.04Q22.66 0.68 down from 202426270%$4,090
Rank 39; likely between #30 and #51 of 144Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaSeismological Society of America · United States
1.02Q23.34 0.28 up from 202452122%—
Rank 40; likely between #26 and #56 of 144Solid EarthOACopernicus Publications · Germany
1.02Q22.20 0.94 down from 2024234100%$1,811Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 41; likely between #34 and #49 of 144TectonophysicsElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.02Q22.47 0.36 down from 202483336%$3,190Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 42; likely between #32 and #51 of 144Journal of Structural GeologyElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.01Q22.98 0.01 up from 202451250%$3,380
Rank 43; likely between #34 and #50 of 144Journal of Asian Earth SciencesElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.01Q22.34 0.20 down from 20249938%$3,330
Rank 44; likely between #30 and #56 of 144Earth Planets and SpaceOASpringer Nature · Japan
1.00Q23.04 0.16 up from 2024545100%$1,640
Rank 45; likely between #33 and #55 of 144Seismological Research LettersSeismological Society of America · United States
0.99Q22.44 0.70 down from 202478222%—
Rank 46; likely between #26 and #69 of 144Acta Geodaetica et GeophysicaSpringer Science+Business Media · Hungary
0.98Q22.52 0.27 up from 20248917%$3,390
Rank 47; likely between #23 and #73 of 144VolcanicaOAFrance
0.97Q22.27 0.64 down from 202498100%—
Rank 48; likely between #41 and #57 of 144Journal of Applied GeophysicsElsevier BV · Netherlands
0.94Q22.71 0.25 up from 202480213%$3,180Rising vs field, 2022–25
Rank 49; likely between #37 and #69 of 144GeosphereOAGeological Society of America · United States
0.91Q22.11 0.74 down from 2024221100%$2,750
Rank 50; likely between #32 and #72 of 144GeoHazardsOAMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute · Switzerland
0.91Q22.64 0.69 up from 2024120100%$1,207

The endpoints below each rank show its likely range. How rank ranges are calculated

Citations made in 2025. Corpus-wide, 84.3% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

15 additional Geophysics journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2022–2024, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2025. Publication window: 2022–2024. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
144
Window papers (baseline)
52,558 -5.9% from indicator year 2022
Median OJR
0.749 +3.8% from indicator year 2022
Rising journals (2025)
9

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2022–2024 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals96100104106110110112115124125132132137135138142143147143147144144143145144144
Window papers (baseline)22,19524,52725,89927,55229,38930,97232,06033,14934,14936,58937,41139,77741,39144,25147,18551,16852,79854,04654,83055,67856,22555,55555,83655,11554,10252,558
Median OJR0.6960.6980.8000.890.8150.8030.8530.8240.760.82900.810.8820.84690.930.910.8790.900.840.82920.790.770.84720.720.730.7500.749

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.