OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2000

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2000

Nature and Landscape Conservation journal rankings 2000

37 ranked journals · Subfield in Environmental Science

Nature and Landscape Conservation has 37 ranked journals in 2000. The median journal has an OJR of 0.79, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.28. The top three are Ecological Monographs, Journal of Ecology, and Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2000. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 1997–1999, the window the 2000 score is computed on.

37
9% of Environmental Science
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.79
This subfieldAll 0.66World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

14%
All fields: 12%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,600
Median positive listed APC: $3,600 among 21 journals. 16 have no known price. All fields: $3,570.

Subfields of Environmental Science (11)

37 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Nature and Landscape Conservation ranking, 2000

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 1999. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 1997–1999, the window the 2000 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 1997–1999 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2000.

Compare
1Ecological MonographsWiley · United States
3.98Q13.97no 1999 value14113%$3,970—
2Journal of EcologyWiley · United Kingdom
3.33Q12.68no 1999 value34250%$3,610—
3Reviews in Fish Biology and FisheriesSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
2.47Q11.98no 1999 value696%$4,690—
4FisheriesWiley · United States
2.11Q11.51no 1999 value950%$3,500—
5Journal of Vegetation ScienceWiley · United Kingdom
1.83Q11.96no 1999 value30014%$3,600—
6Applied Vegetation ScienceWiley · United Kingdom
1.49Q11.67no 1999 value6110%$3,600—
7Journal of Tropical EcologyCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
1.43Q11.21no 1999 value18712%$3,550—
8Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic SciencesCanadian Science Publishing · Canada
1.34Q11.43no 1999 value1,1882%——
9CopeiaAmerican Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists · United States
1.28Q11.33no 1999 value4731%——
10Plant EcologySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.28Q11.02no 1999 value3727%$4,090—
11Marine and Freshwater ResearchCSIRO Publishing · Australia
1.27Q21.39no 1999 value34510%——
1.25Q21.27no 1999 value3153%$3,500—
13Silva FennicaOAFinnish Society of Forest Science · Finland
1.21Q20.68no 1999 value92100%$862—
14Canadian Journal of Forest ResearchNRC Research Press · Canada
1.15Q21.20no 1999 value7412%——
1.03Q21.00no 1999 value1813%——
16Acta OecologicaElsevier BV · France
1.02Q20.79no 1999 value1999%$3,210—
17Environmental Biology of FishesSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.99Q20.75no 1999 value4115%$2,490—
18Ecology Of Freshwater FishWiley · United Kingdom
0.97Q20.73no 1999 value7912%$4,150—
19Environmental ValuesSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
0.79Q20.58no 1999 value1725%$3,650—
0.79Q30.78no 1999 value3711%$3,500—
21Ecological ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · Japan
0.74Q30.91no 1999 value1189%$3,000—
22Fisheries Management and EcologyWiley · United Kingdom
0.70Q30.81no 1999 value1239%$4,430—
23Scandinavian Journal of Forest ResearchTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.65Q30.60no 1999 value1953%——
24Journal of Fish BiologyWiley · United Kingdom
0.52Q30.64no 1999 value1,4884%$4,480—
25New ForestsSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.49Q30.41no 1999 value1323%$3,790—
26Western Journal of Applied ForestryOxford University Press · United States
0.47Q30.52no 1999 value7224%——
27Southern Journal of Applied ForestryOxford University Press · United States
0.45Q30.54no 1999 value10419%——
28Silvae genetica/Silvae GeneticaOADe Gruyter Open · Poland
0.33Q30.52no 1999 value720%——
29Northern Journal of Applied ForestryOxford University Press · United States
0.27Q40.24no 1999 value1009%——
30European Journal of Forest ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.26Q40.30no 1999 value6416%$2,590—
31Northeastern NaturalistEagle Hill Institute · United States
0.24Q40.23no 1999 value911%——
32Ichthyological ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · Japan
0.19Q40.25no 1999 value1815%$2,390—
33Japanese Journal of IchthyologyIchthyological Society of Japan · Japan
0.17Q40.18no 1999 value300%——
0.17Q40.19no 1999 value49100%——
35Transactions of the Kansas Academy of ScienceKansas Academy of Science · United States
0.07Q40.08no 1999 value560%——
36Forest SystemsOASpanish National Research Council · Spain
0.05Q40.06no 1999 value85100%——
37Journal of Forest ScienceOACzech Academy of Agricultural Sciences · Czechia
0.00Q40.00no 1999 value530%——

Citations made in 2000. Corpus-wide, 66.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

16 additional Nature and Landscape Conservation journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 1997–1999, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2000. Publication window: 1997–1999. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
37
Window papers (baseline)
18,347 Change unavailable from indicator year 1997
Median OJR
0.79 Change unavailable from indicator year 1997
Rising journals (2025)
2

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 1997–1999 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals3743444645434548515556595961596162595857565757565555
Window papers (baseline)18,34720,76321,74323,19323,11624,46325,87727,59329,39730,78231,96233,22934,73736,32438,09539,84341,37841,97741,06640,16039,32540,50842,30642,85042,16040,654
Median OJR0.790.8160.840.8170.8670.8150.920.9550.890.8140.8680.950.9581.051.080.930.990.980.910.8510.8460.740.690.680.710.66

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.