OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2025

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2025

Nature and Landscape Conservation journal rankings 2025

55 ranked journals · Subfield in Environmental Science

Nature and Landscape Conservation has 55 ranked journals in 2025. The median journal has an OJR of 0.66, below the world average of 1.00, down 0.04 on 2024; Q1 starts at OJR 0.83. The three highest-scoring journals with stable ranks are Ecological Monographs, Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture, and Journal of Ecology: each is likely ranked within the top 3.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2025. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2022–2024, the window the 2025 score is computed on.

55
6% of Environmental Science
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.66-0.04 vs 2024
This subfieldAll 0.78World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

31%
All fields: 38%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,550
Median positive listed APC: $3,550 among 29 journals. 26 have no known price. All fields: $3,200.

Subfields of Environmental Science (11)

55 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Loading every ranked journal in this list…
Nature and Landscape Conservation ranking, 2025

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

The small range under it is the likely rank range: in 95% of 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers, it ranked inside that range. Journals whose ranges overlap are not clearly different.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2024. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2022–2024, the window the 2025 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2022–2024 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2016 to 2025.

A label compares the 2022→2025 change with the median change of the journal’s field or domain. Rising needs a relative change of +10% or more that is at least 2 standard errors above zero; Falling needs -9.1% or less (rounded), at least 2 standard errors below zero. Sorting uses that relative change.

Compare
Rank 1; likely between #1 and #3 of 55Ecological MonographsWiley · United States
3.90Q16.68 2.28 down from 202411479%$3,970
Rank 2; likely between #1 and #3 of 55Reviews in Fisheries Science & AquacultureTaylor & Francis · United States
2.88Q17.93 2.35 up from 20247353%—
Rank 3; likely between #2 and #3 of 55Journal of EcologyWiley · United Kingdom
2.56Q16.08 0.38 up from 202459170%$3,610
Rank 4; likely between #4 and #6 of 55Reviews in Fish Biology and FisheriesSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.93Q14.84 0.24 down from 202419863%$4,690
Rank 5; likely between #4 and #7 of 55Forest EcosystemsOASpringer Science+Business Media · China
1.71Q14.83 0.20 up from 2024277100%$1,000
Rank 6; likely between #3 and #10 of 55Journal of Plant EcologyOAOxford University Press · United Kingdom
1.62Q14.65 0.69 up from 2024265100%$2,190Rising vs field, 2022–25
Rank 7; likely between #6 and #10 of 55Applied Vegetation ScienceWiley · United Kingdom
1.37Q13.82 0.99 up from 202417280%$3,600
Rank 8; likely between #5 and #11 of 55Journal of Vegetation ScienceWiley · United Kingdom
1.35Q12.97 0.26 up from 202420779%$3,600
Rank 9; likely between #7 and #11 of 55Annals of Forest ScienceOASpringer Science+Business Media
1.23Q13.42 0.41 up from 2024140100%$2,390
Rank 10; likely between #6 and #14 of 55Forestry An International Journal of Forest ResearchOxford University Press · United Kingdom
1.19Q13.89 0.26 up from 202419557%$3,810
Rank 11; likely between #9 and #12 of 55European Journal of Forest ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
1.07Q13.43 0.45 up from 202430550%$2,590
Rank 12; likely between #9 and #25 of 55Journal of EcohydraulicsTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.97Q12.64 0.46 up from 20244047%—
Rank 13; likely between #12 and #22 of 55Plant EcologySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.84Q11.86 0.16 up from 202426122%$4,090
Rank 14; likely between #12 and #23 of 55Ecology Of Freshwater FishWiley · United Kingdom
0.83Q11.70 0.30 up from 202416770%$4,150
Rank 15; likely between #12 and #26 of 55Fisheries Management and EcologyWiley · United Kingdom
0.82Q21.85 0.19 down from 202423863%$4,430
Rank 16; likely between #13 and #24 of 55Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic SciencesCanadian Science Publishing · Canada
0.80Q22.23 0.02 down from 202438857%—
Rank 17; likely between #12 and #26 of 55Acta OecologicaElsevier BV · France
0.80Q21.74 0.26 up from 202415723%$3,210
Rank 18; likely between #12 and #28 of 55Tropical EcologySpringer Science+Business Media · India
0.79Q22.22 0.08 up from 20241578%$3,190
Rank 19; likely between #12 and #30 of 55International Journal of Forestry ResearchOAHindawi Publishing Corporation · United Kingdom
0.79Q22.25 0.21 up from 2024111100%$860
Rank 20; likely between #14 and #26 of 55Journal of Fish BiologyWiley · United Kingdom
0.76Q21.83 0.23 down from 20241,01165%$4,480
Rank 21; likely between #16 and #28 of 55River Research and ApplicationsWiley · United Kingdom
0.72Q22.07 0.05 down from 202445868%$4,110
Rank 22; likely between #15 and #31 of 55iForest - Biogeosciences and ForestryOAItaly
0.72Q22.14 0.07 up from 2024150100%—
Rank 23; likely between #14 and #33 of 55Silva FennicaOAFinnish Society of Forest Science · Finland
0.70Q21.82 0.07 up from 2024112100%$862
Rank 24; likely between #15 and #33 of 55Transactions of the American Fisheries SocietyWiley · United States
0.70Q21.53 0.20 up from 202413554%$3,500
Rank 25; likely between #19 and #31 of 55Environmental Biology of FishesSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.68Q21.33 0.50 down from 202442535%$2,490Rising vs field, 2022–25
Rank 26; likely between #18 and #32 of 55Canadian Journal of Forest ResearchNRC Research Press · Canada
0.68Q22.15 0.47 up from 202431247%—
Rank 27; likely between #18 and #33 of 55New ForestsSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.67Q21.60 0.35 down from 202418529%$3,790Falling vs field, 2022–25
Rank 28; likely between #17 and #34 of 55Ecological ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · Japan
0.66Q21.82 0.30 up from 202422762%$3,000
Rank 29; likely between #15 and #37 of 55Environmental ValuesSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
0.62Q31.60 0.40 up from 202412345%$3,650
Rank 30; likely between #21 and #36 of 55Journal of Tropical EcologyCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
0.61Q31.48 0.24 up from 202411443%$3,550
Rank 31; likely between #23 and #37 of 55Scandinavian Journal of Forest ResearchTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.59Q31.67 0.07 down from 202411780%—
Rank 32; likely between #26 and #36 of 55Marine and Freshwater ResearchCSIRO Publishing · Australia
0.58Q31.84 0.13 up from 202431756%—
Rank 33; likely between #25 and #37 of 55ZoologyElsevier BV · Germany
0.57Q31.45 0.09 down from 202410122%$4,101
Rank 34; likely between #27 and #37 of 55North American Journal of Fisheries ManagementWiley · United States
0.56Q31.27 0.06 up from 202431735%$3,500
Rank 35; likely between #22 and #40 of 55Plant Ecology & DiversityTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.55Q31.45 0.31 up from 20245958%—
Rank 36; likely between #29 and #40 of 55Journal of Forest ScienceOACzech Academy of Agricultural Sciences · Czechia
0.49Q31.39 0.10 up from 2024145100%—
Rank 37; likely between #34 and #45 of 55Chelonian Conservation and BiologyOAAllen Press · United States
0.42Q30.78 0.14 down from 202483100%—
Rank 38; likely between #32 and #47 of 55San Francisco Estuary and Watershed ScienceOAeScholarship Publishing, University of California · United States
0.42Q31.23 0.16 up from 202463100%—
Rank 39; likely between #36 and #44 of 55Southern Forests a Journal of Forest ScienceTaylor & Francis · South Africa
0.41Q31.40 0.30 up from 20248035%—
Rank 40; likely between #32 and #49 of 55New Zealand journal of forestry scienceOASpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.39Q31.15 0.27 down from 202449100%—
Rank 41; likely between #34 and #48 of 55Forest SystemsOASpanish National Research Council · Spain
0.38Q31.23 0.34 up from 202473100%—
Rank 42; likely between #39 and #49 of 55Ichthyological ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · Japan
0.33Q30.80 0.21 down from 202414933%$2,390
Rank 43; likely between #38 and #50 of 55Annals of Forest ResearchOA‘Marin Drăcea’ National Research-Development Institute in Forestry · Romania
0.33Q40.77 0.72 down from 2024130100%—
Rank 44; likely between #37 and #51 of 55Silvae genetica/Silvae GeneticaOADe Gruyter Open · Poland
0.32Q41.05 0.09 down from 202455100%—
Rank 45; likely between #39 and #49 of 55Journal of Fish and Wildlife ManagementOAUnited States
0.31Q40.62 0.25 down from 2024128100%—
Rank 46; likely between #39 and #50 of 55FisheriesWiley · United States
0.30Q40.65 0.10 up from 202437238%$3,500
Rank 47; likely between #39 and #51 of 55Ichthyology & HerpetologyAmerican Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists · United States
0.29Q40.54 0.63 down from 202420524%—
Rank 48; likely between #41 and #51 of 55Madera y BosquesOAMexico
0.28Q40.66 0.06 up from 2024102100%—
Rank 49; likely between #36 and #54 of 55Relations Beyond AnthropocentrismOALED Edizioni Universitarie · Italy
0.25Q40.50 0.25 up from 202434100%—
Rank 50; likely between #44 and #53 of 55Journal of Herpetological Medicine and SurgeryUnited States
0.23Q40.43 0.11 down from 20241140%—

The endpoints below each rank show its likely range. How rank ranges are calculated

Citations made in 2025. Corpus-wide, 84.3% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

9 additional Nature and Landscape Conservation journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2022–2024, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2025. Publication window: 2022–2024. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
55
Window papers (baseline)
40,654 -3.9% from indicator year 2022
Median OJR
0.66 -4.3% from indicator year 2022
Rising journals (2025)
2

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2022–2024 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals3743444645434548515556595961596162595857565757565555
Window papers (baseline)18,34720,76321,74323,19323,11624,46325,87727,59329,39730,78231,96233,22934,73736,32438,09539,84341,37841,97741,06640,16039,32540,50842,30642,85042,16040,654
Median OJR0.790.8160.840.8170.8670.8150.920.9550.890.8140.8680.950.9581.051.080.930.990.980.910.8510.8460.740.690.680.710.66

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.