OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2001

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2001

Nature and Landscape Conservation journal rankings 2001

43 ranked journals · Subfield in Environmental Science

Nature and Landscape Conservation has 43 ranked journals in 2001. The median journal has an OJR of 0.82, below the world average of 1.00, up 0.03 on 2000; Q1 starts at OJR 1.27. The top three are Ecological Monographs, Journal of Ecology, and Journal of Vegetation Science.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2001. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 1998–2000, the window the 2001 score is computed on.

43
9% of Environmental Science
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.82+0.03 vs 2000
This subfieldAll 0.68World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

16%
All fields: 12%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,575
Median positive listed APC: $3,575 among 24 journals. 19 have no known price. All fields: $3,560.

Subfields of Environmental Science (11)

43 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Nature and Landscape Conservation ranking, 2001

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2000. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 1998–2000, the window the 2001 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 1998–2000 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2001.

Compare
1Ecological MonographsWiley · United States
4.21Q13.53 0.44 down from 20001467%$3,970
2Journal of EcologyWiley · United Kingdom
2.85Q12.48 0.20 down from 200033747%$3,610
3Journal of Vegetation ScienceWiley · United Kingdom
2.28Q12.06 0.10 up from 200030715%$3,600
4Reviews in Fish Biology and FisheriesSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
2.12Q11.80 0.18 down from 2000800%$4,690
5FisheriesWiley · United States
2.00Q11.96 0.44 up from 20001052%$3,500
6Journal of Tropical EcologyCambridge University Press · United Kingdom
1.62Q11.37 0.16 up from 20001733%$3,550
7Plant EcologySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.54Q11.37 0.35 up from 200035910%$4,090
8Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic SciencesCanadian Science Publishing · Canada
1.42Q11.47 0.04 up from 20001,4484%—
9Acta OecologicaElsevier BV · France
1.33Q11.42 0.62 up from 20001556%$3,210
1.30Q11.23 0.04 down from 20003194%$3,500
11CopeiaAmerican Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists · United States
1.27Q11.21 0.12 down from 20005012%—
1.21Q21.28 0.28 up from 200017614%—
13Applied Vegetation ScienceWiley · United Kingdom
1.18Q20.74 0.93 down from 2000903%$3,600
14Ecology Of Freshwater FishWiley · United Kingdom
1.09Q20.93 0.20 up from 2000786%$4,150
15Marine and Freshwater ResearchCSIRO Publishing · Australia
1.04Q21.16 0.22 down from 200036410%—
16Canadian Journal of Forest ResearchNRC Research Press · Canada
1.01Q20.94 0.26 down from 20008693%—
17Environmental Biology of FishesSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
1.00Q20.87 0.12 up from 20004241%$2,490
18Environmental ValuesSAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
0.98Q20.77 0.19 up from 20001616%$3,650
19Annals of Forest ScienceOASpringer Science+Business Media
0.95Q20.91 0.91 up from 20007097%$2,390
0.87Q20.90 0.12 up from 20003494%$3,500
21Fisheries Management and EcologyWiley · United Kingdom
0.83Q20.71 0.11 down from 20001394%$4,430
22Ecological ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · Japan
0.82Q20.90 0.01 down from 20001261%$3,000
23Silva FennicaOAFinnish Society of Forest Science · Finland
0.76Q30.77 0.09 up from 200088100%$862
24Forestry An International Journal of Forest ResearchOxford University Press · United Kingdom
0.75Q30.50 0.19 down from 200018022%$3,810
25Scandinavian Journal of Forest ResearchTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.65Q30.54 0.06 down from 20002205%—
26Journal of Fish BiologyWiley · United Kingdom
0.64Q30.74 0.10 up from 20001,5695%$4,480
27River SystemsGermany
0.51Q30.50 0.20 up from 2000334%—
28Silvae genetica/Silvae GeneticaOADe Gruyter Open · Poland
0.48Q30.49 0.03 down from 2000790%—
29Ichthyological ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · Japan
0.46Q30.54 0.29 up from 200018215%$2,390
30New ForestsSpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.45Q30.49 0.08 up from 20001250%$3,790
31Southern Journal of Applied ForestryOxford University Press · United States
0.44Q30.36 0.17 down from 200010626%—
32Western Journal of Applied ForestryOxford University Press · United States
0.43Q30.33 0.19 down from 20008512%—
33Northern Journal of Applied ForestryOxford University Press · United States
0.39Q30.34 0.10 up from 20008513%—
34European Journal of Forest ResearchSpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.29Q40.32 0.03 up from 20009311%$2,590
35Northeastern NaturalistEagle Hill Institute · United States
0.24Q40.24 0.01 up from 20001281%—
0.15Q40.32 0.13 up from 20003896%—
37Tropical EcologySpringer Science+Business Media · India
0.15Q40.03 0.03 up from 2000370%$3,190
38Japanese Journal of IchthyologyIchthyological Society of Japan · Japan
0.10Q40.13 0.05 down from 2000340%—
0.09Q40.05no 2000 value438%——
40Transactions of the Kansas Academy of ScienceKansas Academy of Science · United States
0.07Q40.13 0.05 up from 2000580%—
41Forest SystemsOASpanish National Research Council · Spain
0.06Q40.14 0.08 up from 2000138100%—
42Scientia ForestalisOAEditora da Universidade de São Paulo · Brazil
0.05Q40.03 0.08 down from 2000360%—
43Journal of Forest ScienceOACzech Academy of Agricultural Sciences · Czechia
0.04Q40.03 0.03 up from 20001190%—

Citations made in 2001. Corpus-wide, 67.0% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

11 additional Nature and Landscape Conservation journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 1998–2000, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2001. Publication window: 1998–2000. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
43
Window papers (baseline)
20,763 Change unavailable from indicator year 1998
Median OJR
0.816 Change unavailable from indicator year 1998
Rising journals (2025)
2

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 1998–2000 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals3743444645434548515556595961596162595857565757565555
Window papers (baseline)18,34720,76321,74323,19323,11624,46325,87727,59329,39730,78231,96233,22934,73736,32438,09539,84341,37841,97741,06640,16039,32540,50842,30642,85042,16040,654
Median OJR0.790.8160.840.8170.8670.8150.920.9550.890.8140.8680.950.9581.051.080.930.990.980.910.8510.8460.740.690.680.710.66

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.