OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2000

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2000

Reproductive Medicine journal rankings 2000

19 ranked journals · Subfield in Medicine

Reproductive Medicine has 19 ranked journals in 2000. The median journal has an OJR of 0.72, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.53. The top three are Human Reproduction Update, Fertility and Sterility, and Reviews of Reproduction.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2000. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 1997–1999, the window the 2000 score is computed on.

19
1% of Medicine
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.72
This subfieldAll 0.66World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

16%
All fields: 12%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$4,490
Median positive listed APC: $4,490 among 9 journals. 10 have no known price. All fields: $3,570.

Subfields of Medicine (42)

Show all 42 subfields

19 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Reproductive Medicine ranking, 2000

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 1999. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 1997–1999, the window the 2000 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 1997–1999 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2000.

Compare
1Human Reproduction UpdateOxford University Press · United Kingdom
1.86Q13.50no 1999 value20014%$4,490—
2Fertility and SterilityElsevier BV · United States
1.82Q13.26no 1999 value1,254100%$4,220—
3Reviews of ReproductionBioscientifica · United Kingdom
1.80Q13.81no 1999 value10036%——
4Human ReproductionOxford University Press · United Kingdom
1.66Q13.32no 1999 value1,96021%$4,630—
5Molecular Human ReproductionOxford University Press · United Kingdom
1.53Q13.25no 1999 value45614%$4,490—
6Seminars in Reproductive MedicineThieme Medical Publishers (Germany) · United States
1.06Q21.83no 1999 value1320%——
7Animal Reproduction ScienceElsevier BV · Netherlands
0.85Q21.10no 1999 value3073%$3,770—
8Current Opinion in Obstetrics & GynecologyLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
0.81Q21.37no 1999 value2280%——
9Journal of Assisted Reproduction and GeneticsSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
0.76Q21.38no 1999 value32192%$4,690—
10CryobiologyElsevier BV · United States
0.72Q21.47no 1999 value1935%$3,870—
11AndrologiaWiley · Germany
0.55Q30.77no 1999 value6251%$2,700—
12Gynecologic and Obstetric InvestigationKarger Publishers · Switzerland
0.52Q30.87no 1999 value2706%——
13Gynecological EndocrinologyOAInforma · United Kingdom
0.51Q31.06no 1999 value19410%——
14Archives of AndrologyTaylor & Francis · United States
0.42Q30.85no 1999 value1682%——
0.35Q30.33no 1999 value1937%$4,520—
16Human FertilityOATaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.26Q40.55no 1999 value407%——
17AndrologieSpringer Nature · France
0.03Q40.14no 1999 value9643%——
18JBRABrazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction · Brazil
0.00Q40.00no 1999 value54100%——
18The World Journal of Men s HealthOAKorean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology · South Korea
0.00Q40.00no 1999 value760%——

Citations made in 2000. Corpus-wide, 66.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

10 additional Reproductive Medicine journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 1997–1999, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2000. Publication window: 1997–1999. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
19
Window papers (baseline)
12,085 Change unavailable from indicator year 1997
Median OJR
0.722 Change unavailable from indicator year 1997
Rising journals (2025)
2

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 1997–1999 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1920222225252731323136363740434546505050484954565253
Window papers (baseline)12,08513,37914,42615,32715,56716,16817,31118,82420,01821,75723,57024,84625,04425,01226,01027,27928,54629,32429,77630,28031,29933,12935,07836,10636,66437,232
Median OJR0.7220.7200.710.640.620.700.760.8030.8780.930.8770.960.940.890.830.8660.780.820.8720.920.970.9140.9090.860.80110.8009

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.