OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2000

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2000

Ophthalmology journal rankings 2000

40 ranked journals · Subfield in Medicine

Ophthalmology has 40 ranked journals in 2000. The median journal has an OJR of 0.44, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 0.78. The top three are Survey of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology, and Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2000. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 1997–1999, the window the 2000 score is computed on.

40
2% of Medicine
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.44
This subfieldAll 0.66World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

13%
All fields: 12%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,790
Median positive listed APC: $3,790 among 17 journals. 23 have no known price. All fields: $3,570.

Subfields of Medicine (42)

Show all 42 subfields

40 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Ophthalmology ranking, 2000

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 1999. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 1997–1999, the window the 2000 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 1997–1999 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2000.

Compare
1Survey of OphthalmologyElsevier BV · United States
1.92Q12.70no 1999 value1986%$4,620—
2OphthalmologyElsevier BV · United States
1.72Q12.59no 1999 value1,34024%$4,990—
3Progress in Retinal and Eye ResearchElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.69Q14.56no 1999 value726%$6,710—
4American Journal of OphthalmologyElsevier BV · United States
1.41Q12.29no 1999 value1,0078%$4,300—
5Archives of OphthalmologyAmerican Medical Association · United States
1.25Q12.01no 1999 value1,13815%——
6Journal of GlaucomaLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
1.10Q11.09no 1999 value2441%——
7Journal of Cataract & Refractive SurgeryLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
1.02Q11.80no 1999 value1,1101%$3,000—
8British Journal of OphthalmologyBMJ · United Kingdom
0.93Q11.50no 1999 value1,00999%——
9Ophthalmic EpidemiologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.84Q11.33no 1999 value684%——
10Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental OphthalmologySpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.78Q11.32no 1999 value4413%$2,990—
0.72Q20.86no 1999 value5020%——
12Ocular Immunology and InflammationTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.69Q20.92no 1999 value998%——
13Current Eye ResearchTaylor & Francis · United States
0.62Q21.19no 1999 value4751%——
14Experimental Eye ResearchElsevier BV · United Kingdom
0.58Q21.56no 1999 value4784%$4,010—
15Seminars in OphthalmologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.56Q20.98no 1999 value800%——
16RetinaLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
0.50Q20.74no 1999 value6742%——
17EyeSpringer Nature · United Kingdom
0.50Q20.92no 1999 value7042%$3,590—
18Veterinary OphthalmologyWiley · United Kingdom
0.48Q20.96no 1999 value7017%$3,860—
19European Journal of OphthalmologySAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
0.47Q20.75no 1999 value1722%$4,150—
20Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and TherapeuticsMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
0.45Q20.83no 1999 value1730%——
21Acta Ophthalmologica ScandinavicaWiley · United Kingdom
0.44Q30.57no 1999 value46062%——
22Current Opinion in OphthalmologyLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
0.43Q30.76no 1999 value2710%——
23Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & StrabismusSlack Incorporated (United States) · United States
0.43Q30.67no 1999 value2040%——
0.38Q30.79no 1999 value2104%$3,330—
25International OphthalmologySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.37Q30.24no 1999 value1950%$3,790—
26OphthalmologicaKarger Publishers · Switzerland
0.36Q30.56no 1999 value20611%——
27Korean Journal of OphthalmologyOAKorean Ophthalmological Society · South Korea
0.32Q30.31no 1999 value655%$250—
28Japanese Journal of OphthalmologySpringer Science+Business Media
0.32Q30.63no 1999 value2421%$3,790—
29Ophthalmic ResearchOAKarger Publishers · Switzerland
0.29Q30.63no 1999 value11315%——
30Klinische Monatsblätter für AugenheilkundeThieme Medical Publishers (Germany) · Germany
0.27Q30.35no 1999 value4940%——
31International Ophthalmology ClinicsLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
0.25Q40.28no 1999 value2190%——
32Ophthalmology Clinics of North AmericaElsevier BV · United States
0.14Q40.17no 1999 value890%——
33Clinical Eye and Vision CareElsevier BV · United States
0.14Q40.25no 1999 value874%——
34Clinical and Experimental OptometryTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.11Q40.12no 1999 value10312%$2,900—
0.08Q40.13no 1999 value430%——
36Spektrum der AugenheilkundeSpringer Science+Business Media · Austria
0.06Q40.10no 1999 value12623%$3,290—
37Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual ScienceOACadmus Press · United States
0.04Q40.11no 1999 value3000%$1,850—
38Hong Kong Journal of OphthalmologyOAHong Kong Academy of Medicine · Hong Kong SAR China
0.01Q40.00no 1999 value45100%——
39Zhonghua yandibing zazhiChinese Medical Association · China
0.00Q40.00no 1999 value350%——
39Arquivos Brasileiros de OftalmologiaOAConselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia · Brazil
0.00Q40.05no 1999 value229100%——

Citations made in 2000. Corpus-wide, 66.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

11 additional Ophthalmology journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 1997–1999, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2000. Publication window: 1997–1999. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
40
Window papers (baseline)
10,473 Change unavailable from indicator year 1997
Median OJR
0.44 Change unavailable from indicator year 1997
Rising journals (2025)
10

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 1997–1999 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals404342414346485155596062677075748087959810010310310510096
Window papers (baseline)10,47311,37812,22614,05215,09417,13618,46720,62121,85123,33624,41227,88428,46229,13128,55830,79333,05634,53335,76836,39037,17341,08945,52548,38846,94645,419
Median OJR0.440.530.5910.6040.5950.660.710.700.720.5730.6880.6010.6250.6190.670.6950.650.6140.5890.6150.6120.580.5930.5710.630.68

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.