OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2003

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2003

Ophthalmology journal rankings 2003

41 ranked journals · Subfield in Medicine

Ophthalmology has 41 ranked journals in 2003. The median journal has an OJR of 0.60, below the world average of 1.00, up 0.01 on 2002; Q1 starts at OJR 0.91. The top three are Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, Survey of Ophthalmology, and Archives of Ophthalmology.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2003. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2000–2002, the window the 2003 score is computed on.

41
2% of Medicine
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.60+0.01 vs 2002
This subfieldAll 0.75World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

10%
All fields: 13%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,790
Median positive listed APC: $3,790 among 19 journals. 22 have no known price. All fields: $3,550.

Subfields of Medicine (42)

Show all 42 subfields

41 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Ophthalmology ranking, 2003

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2002. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2000–2002, the window the 2003 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2000–2002 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2000 to 2003.

Compare
1Progress in Retinal and Eye ResearchElsevier BV · Netherlands
4.23Q18.20 2.78 up from 2002833%$6,710
2Survey of OphthalmologyElsevier BV · United States
2.34Q13.26 0.75 up from 20022240%$4,620
3Archives of OphthalmologyAmerican Medical Association · United States
1.88Q13.07 1.02 up from 200289814%—
4OphthalmologyElsevier BV · United States
1.73Q12.63 0.35 up from 20021,51025%$4,990
5American Journal of OphthalmologyElsevier BV · United States
1.73Q12.76 0.61 up from 20021,2964%$4,300
6Current Opinion in OphthalmologyLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
1.24Q12.01 0.71 up from 20022070%—
7Journal of GlaucomaLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
1.22Q11.72 0.76 up from 20021984%—
8British Journal of OphthalmologyBMJ · United Kingdom
1.04Q12.26 0.53 up from 20021,25699%—
9RetinaLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
0.99Q11.48 0.51 up from 20023511%—
10Experimental Eye ResearchElsevier BV · United Kingdom
0.98Q12.62 0.88 up from 20024793%$4,010
11Journal of Cataract & Refractive SurgeryLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
0.91Q11.69 0.15 down from 20021,3290%$3,000
12Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and TherapeuticsMary Ann Liebert, Inc. · United States
0.89Q21.62 0.51 up from 20021742%—
13Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental OphthalmologySpringer Science+Business Media · Germany
0.86Q21.38 0.19 up from 20024623%$2,990
14Current Eye ResearchTaylor & Francis · United States
0.79Q21.32 0.01 up from 20023573%—
15Ophthalmic EpidemiologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.79Q21.63 0.61 up from 2002830%—
16International Ophthalmology ClinicsLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
0.76Q21.01 0.20 up from 20021500%—
17Acta Ophthalmologica ScandinavicaWiley · United Kingdom
0.70Q21.09 0.04 up from 200243060%—
18Ophthalmic ResearchOAKarger Publishers · Switzerland
0.64Q21.08 0.27 up from 20021686%—
0.63Q21.04 0.17 up from 20023178%$4,150
0.62Q20.91 0.06 up from 200225910%$3,330
21EyeSpringer Nature · United Kingdom
0.60Q20.75 0.03 up from 20028125%$3,590
22OphthalmologicaKarger Publishers · Switzerland
0.57Q30.86 0.07 down from 200224017%—
0.56Q30.64 0.15 down from 20023082%—
24Ocular Immunology and InflammationTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.56Q30.57 0.26 down from 2002973%—
25European Journal of OphthalmologySAGE Publishing · United Kingdom
0.55Q30.81 0.08 up from 20022393%$4,150
26Ophthalmology Clinics of North AmericaElsevier BV · United States
0.47Q30.77 0.37 up from 20021291%—
27Canadian Journal of OphthalmologyElsevier BV · Canada
0.45Q30.47 0.23 down from 20021487%$3,220
28Japanese Journal of OphthalmologySpringer Science+Business Media
0.42Q30.62 0.13 down from 20023311%$3,790
29Seminars in OphthalmologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.39Q30.40 0.14 up from 2002940%—
0.37Q30.53 0.10 up from 20023270%—
31Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & StrabismusSlack Incorporated (United States) · United States
0.35Q30.56 0.13 up from 20021891%—
32Klinische Monatsblätter für AugenheilkundeThieme Medical Publishers (Germany) · Germany
0.28Q40.42 0.07 up from 20024530%—
33International OphthalmologySpringer Science+Business Media · Netherlands
0.26Q40.43 0.40 up from 200288—$3,790
34Clinical and Experimental OptometryTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.25Q40.57 0.39 up from 20021395%$2,900
35Veterinary OphthalmologyWiley · United Kingdom
0.18Q40.57 0.12 down from 20021254%$3,860
36Korean Journal of OphthalmologyOAKorean Ophthalmological Society · South Korea
0.12Q40.09 0.05 down from 2002670%$250
37Spektrum der AugenheilkundeSpringer Science+Business Media · Austria
0.06Q40.14 0.02 down from 20021052%$3,290
38Annals of OphthalmologySpringer Nature · United States
0.05Q40.09 0.01 up from 20021900%—
39Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual ScienceOACadmus Press · United States
0.04Q40.07 0.14 down from 20023,5722%$1,850
40Arquivos Brasileiros de OftalmologiaOAConselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia · Brazil
0.03Q40.11 0.07 up from 2002287100%—
41Zhonghua yandibing zazhiChinese Medical Association · China
0.00Q40.00 0.01 down from 20021910%—

Citations made in 2003. Corpus-wide, 70.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

14 additional Ophthalmology journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2000–2002, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2003. Publication window: 2000–2002. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
41
Window papers (baseline)
14,052 +34.2% from indicator year 2000
Median OJR
0.604 +36.9% from indicator year 2000
Rising journals (2025)
10

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2000–2002 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals404342414346485155596062677075748087959810010310310510096
Window papers (baseline)10,47311,37812,22614,05215,09417,13618,46720,62121,85123,33624,41227,88428,46229,13128,55830,79333,05634,53335,76836,39037,17341,08945,52548,38846,94645,419
Median OJR0.440.530.5910.6040.5950.660.710.700.720.5730.6880.6010.6250.6190.670.6950.650.6140.5890.6150.6120.580.5930.5710.630.68

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.