OpenJournalRank

Journal rankings · indicator year 2016

Choose a field to open its ranking, or a journal to find its row in its subfield’s list.

Subfield ranking · 2016

Reproductive Medicine journal rankings 2016

46 ranked journals · Subfield in Medicine

Reproductive Medicine has 46 ranked journals in 2016. The median OJR fell 0.09 on 2015 to 0.78, below the world average of 1.00; Q1 starts at OJR 1.33. The top three are Human Reproduction Update, Human Reproduction, and Fertility and Sterility.

Ranks and citation indicators: 2016. Journal access status and listed APC: source snapshot September 23, 2026.

Ranked journals

Journals whose main subfield sits in this category and that published at least 30 citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) in 2013–2015, the window the 2016 score is computed on.

46
1% of Medicine
Median OJR

The OpenJournalRank Indicator (OJR) is a free, publicly available metric of a journal’s field-normalized citation impact, computed from open OpenAlex citation data. It compares citations to a journal’s papers from the previous three years with the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and values can be compared across fields. It is computed with the NCI3 method.

The middle OJR among ranked journals in this category: half score higher, half lower. 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type.

The dot is this category, the solid tick is the median of all ranked journals and the dashed line is the world average.

0.78-0.09 vs 2015
This subfieldAll 0.86World 1.00
Open-access journals

Share of ranked journals in this category that are fully open access, so every paper is free to read. Hybrid journals, which sell subscriptions and open single papers for a fee, are not counted.

37%
All fields: 30%
Median listed APC

Median list price of the article processing charge, in US dollars, among ranked journals in this category that list a price above zero. Journals with a listed APC of $0 and journals with no known price are left out of this median. The At a glance table below gives a second median that includes the $0 prices.

$3,670
Median positive listed APC: $3,670 among 22 journals. Another 1 lists $0; 23 have no known price. All fields: $3,390.

Subfields of Medicine (42)

Show all 42 subfields

46 ranked journals

Filters

Quartile

Quartiles split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. Q1 is the top quarter and Q4 the bottom quarter.

They are computed within the list on screen, so a journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 in the global ranking.

Access
APC (list price)
Reproductive Medicine ranking, 2016

Rank is the position by OJR within the list on screen; 1 is the highest.

OJR is field-normalized 3-year citation impact: 1.00 is the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so values compare across fields.

The badge is the journal’s quartile in this list.

OJR

Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is not field-normalized, so compare it only between journals of the same field.

▲ or ▼ is the change from 2015. This is OpenJournalRank’s own count, not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor.

Citable documents (articles, reviews and conference papers) published in 2013–2015, the window the 2016 OJR is computed on. A journal needs at least 30 to be ranked.

Share of the journal’s 2013–2015 papers that are free to read in any open-access form. The green OA tag next to a title marks a fully open-access journal.

List price of the article processing charge in US dollars. “$0 listed” means the listed price is zero; a dash means no price is listed.

The line is the journal’s OJR from 2007 to 2016.

Compare
1Human Reproduction UpdateOxford University Press · United Kingdom
3.54Q112.42 0.63 up from 201518263%$4,490
2Human ReproductionOxford University Press · United Kingdom
2.71Q15.56 0.16 up from 20151,04058%$4,630
3Fertility and SterilityElsevier BV · United States
2.23Q14.06 0.59 down from 20151,777100%$4,220
4Molecular Human ReproductionOxford University Press · United Kingdom
1.85Q13.76 0.54 down from 201527865%$4,490
5Reproductive Biology and EndocrinologyOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
1.77Q13.68 0.41 up from 2015378100%$3,690
6Current Opinion in Obstetrics & GynecologyLippincott Williams & Wilkins · United States
1.63Q12.91 0.28 down from 20152319%—
7Reproductive BioMedicine OnlineElsevier BV · United Kingdom
1.59Q12.91 0.01 down from 201561062%$3,650
8Seminars in Reproductive MedicineThieme Medical Publishers (Germany) · United States
1.51Q12.95 0.49 up from 201520316%—
9AndrologyWiley · United Kingdom
1.50Q12.93 0.17 down from 201537367%$3,090
10Animal Reproduction ScienceElsevier BV · Netherlands
1.37Q12.12 0.38 up from 201564113%$3,770
11The World Journal of Men s HealthOAKorean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology · South Korea
1.33Q12.74 0.30 up from 201594100%—
12SpermatogenesisOATaylor & Francis · United States
1.33Q12.67 0.71 up from 201548100%—
13Journal of Assisted Reproduction and GeneticsSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
1.26Q22.53 0.26 up from 2015647100%$4,690
14CryobiologyElsevier BV · United States
1.26Q22.61 0.48 up from 201536114%$3,870
15Journal of Ovarian ResearchOABioMed Central · United Kingdom
1.22Q22.64 0.32 down from 2015309100%$3,290
1.17Q22.06 0.27 up from 2015147100%—
17Reproductive SciencesSpringer Nature · United States
1.08Q22.12 0.46 down from 201553026%$3,090
1.00Q21.69 0.14 up from 201548630%$4,520
19Asian Journal of AndrologyOAMedknow · China
0.91Q22.04 0.07 up from 2015678100%$711
20Systems Biology in Reproductive MedicineTaylor & Francis · United States
0.89Q21.47 0.11 down from 201514798%—
0.87Q21.59 0.17 up from 201586100%—
22Gynecological EndocrinologyOAInforma · United Kingdom
0.84Q21.64 0.25 down from 201570316%—
23Human FertilityOATaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.79Q21.35 0.04 up from 201512322%—
24BioSocietiesPalgrave Macmillan · United Kingdom
0.77Q31.39 0.38 down from 201512431%$2,990
25AndrologiaWiley · Germany
0.77Q31.48 0.18 up from 201541861%$2,700
26Gynecologic and Obstetric InvestigationKarger Publishers · Switzerland
0.62Q31.15 0.85 down from 201531312%—
27Reproductive BiologyElsevier BV · Poland
0.50Q31.59 0.71 up from 201527814%$2,750
0.42Q30.55 0.20 down from 2015853%$4,150
0.41Q30.82 0.36 up from 2015202100%—
30Current Obstetrics and Gynecology ReportsSpringer Science+Business Media · United States
0.37Q30.77 0.04 up from 20159621%$4,490
0.36Q30.81 0.08 down from 201585100%$1,850
32Advances in Reproductive SciencesOAScientific Research Publishing · United States
0.33Q30.35 0.07 down from 201531100%—
33Andrology-Open AccessOAOMICS Publishing Group · United States
0.32Q30.57 0.16 down from 201557100%—
0.32Q30.40 0.02 down from 20151097%—
35Expert Review of Obstetrics & GynecologyTaylor & Francis · United Kingdom
0.30Q3—no 2015 value55——
0.29Q40.44 0.22 down from 2015796%—
37Middle East Fertility Society JournalOASpringer Science+Business Media · Egypt
0.28Q40.41 0.01 up from 2015174100%$0 listed
0.26Q40.50 0.10 down from 20154541%—
39Gynecology & ObstetricsOAOMICS Publishing Group · United States
0.19Q40.24 0.22 down from 20152995%—
0.18Q40.46 0.19 up from 201581100%—
41IVF LiteMedknow · India
0.15Q40.28 0.06 down from 2015360%—
42International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine (IJRM)OAShahid Sadoghi University of Medical Sciences of Yazd · Iran
0.15Q40.08 0.04 up from 201598100%$260
43Andrology & Gynecology Current ResearchOMICS Publishing Group · United States
0.15Q40.26 0.01 down from 2015499%—
0.12Q40.28 0.16 up from 20158012%$2,500
45JBRABrazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction · Brazil
0.07Q40.22 0.04 down from 201511196%—
0.02Q40.00 0.14 down from 20157148%—

Citations made in 2016. Corpus-wide, 77.2% of core-journal articles and reviews published that year have at least one matched reference; the share varies by journal and field.

20 additional Reproductive Medicine journals with metrics are unranked under this release’s eligibility rules: a journal needs at least 30 citable documents in 2013–2015, at least 80% of them with a subfield, and a positive world-average expectation. Ranks are within the whole category; filters hide rows without re-ranking. OJR excludes self-citations.

Rising journals

At a glance

Indicator year: 2016. Publication window: 2013–2015. How these summaries are calculated

Ranked journals
46
Window papers (baseline)
28,546 +14.1% from indicator year 2013
Median OJR
0.78 -12.4% from indicator year 2013
Rising journals (2025)
2

Window papers are the baseline paper population: citable papers (articles, reviews and conference papers) from 2013–2015 in all journals of the world-average baseline, including non-core journals, counted by each paper’s own subfield. They are not the papers of the ranked journals alone.

Category by indicator year
MeasureYear series20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Ranked journals1920222225252731323136363740434546505050484954565253
Window papers (baseline)12,08513,37914,42615,32715,56716,16817,31118,82420,01821,75723,57024,84625,04425,01226,01027,27928,54629,32429,77630,28031,29933,12935,07836,10636,66437,232
Median OJR0.7220.7200.710.640.620.700.760.8030.8780.930.8770.960.940.890.830.8660.780.820.8720.920.970.9140.9090.860.80110.8009

How to read these rankings

OJR, the OpenJournalRank Indicator
A field-normalized 3-year citation impact, computed from OpenAlex with the NCI3 method. It divides the citations a journal’s papers received by the world average for papers of the same subfield, year and type, so 1.00 is the world average and 2.00 means twice as many citations as expected. Because it is normalized, it can be compared across fields. Read the methodology
Quartiles
Q1 to Q4 split the ranked journals of the list you are viewing into four equal groups by OJR. A journal’s quartile depends on the list: the same journal can be Q1 in its subfield and Q2 among all journals.
Impact factor (2-year)
Citations per paper over a two-year window, counted from OpenAlex. It is easy to compare with familiar impact factors but is not field-normalized, so compare it only within a field. It is not Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor. Why it differs from the Journal Impact Factor
Rank ranges
Each rank in the latest year carries a likely range from 1,000 resamples of the journal’s papers. Where two journals’ ranges overlap, the data cannot tell them apart, so treat neighbouring ranks as ties.